19.01.2015 Views

The Secret Doctrine Volume 3.pdf

The Secret Doctrine Volume 3.pdf

The Secret Doctrine Volume 3.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

terrestrial linguistic evolution.] so did the Hindus. <strong>The</strong> Devanagari, the Sanskrit characters,<br />

are the “speech of the Gods,” and Sanskrit is the divine language.<br />

It is argued in defence of the present version of the Mosaic Books that the mode of language<br />

adopted was an “accommodation” to the ignorance of the Jewish people. But the said “mode<br />

of language” drags down the “sacred text” of Esdras and his colleagues to the level of the<br />

most unspiritual and gross phallic religions. This plea confirms the suspicions entertained by<br />

some Christian Mystics and many philosophical critics, that;<br />

(a) Divine Power as an Absolute Unity had never anything more to do with the Biblical<br />

Jehovah and the “Lord God” than with any other Sephiroth or number. <strong>The</strong> Ain-Suph of the<br />

Kabalah of Moses is as independent of any relation with the created Gods as is<br />

Parabrahman Itself.<br />

(b) <strong>The</strong> teachings veiled in the Old Testament under allegorical expressions are all copied<br />

from the Magical Texts of Babylonia, by Esdras and others, while the earlier Mosaic Text had<br />

its source in Egypt.<br />

A few instances known to almost all Symbologists of note, and especially to the French<br />

Egyptologists, may help to prove the statement. Furthermore, no ancient Hebrew<br />

Philosopher, Philo no more than the Sadducees, claimed, as do now the ignorant Christians,<br />

that the events in the Bible should be taken literally. Philo says most explicitly:<br />

<strong>The</strong> verbal statements are fabulous [in the Book of Law]: it is in the allegory<br />

that we shall find the truth.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Seven Creative Gods- (Page 191) Let us give a few instances, beginning with the<br />

latest narrative, the Hebrew, and thus if possible trace the allegories to their origin.<br />

1. Whence the Creation in six days, the seventh day as day of rest, the seven Elohim, [ In<br />

the first chapter of Genesis the word “God” represents the Elohim - Gods in the plural, not<br />

one God. This is a cunning and dishonest translation. For the whole Kabalah explains<br />

sufficiently that the Alhim (Elohim) are seven: each, creates one of the seven things<br />

enumerated in the first chapter, and these answer allegorically to the seven creations. To<br />

make this clear, count the verses in which it is said “And God saw that it was good,” and you<br />

will find that this is said seven times - in verses 4, 10, 12, 18, 21, 25, and 31. And though the<br />

compilers cunningly represent the creation of man as occurring on the sixth day, yet, having<br />

made man “male and female in the image of God,” the Seven Elohim repeat the sacramental<br />

sentence. “It was good, “ for the seventh time, thus making of man the seventh creation, and<br />

showing the origin of this bit of cosmogony to be in the Hindu creations. <strong>The</strong> Elohim are, of<br />

course, the seven Egyptian Khnûmû, the “assistant-architects”: the seven Amshaspends of<br />

the Zoroastrians: the Seven Spirits subordinate to Ildabaoth of the Nazareans; the seven<br />

Prajâpati of the Hindus, etc.] and the division of space into heaven and earth, in the first<br />

chapter of Genesis<br />

151

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!