20.01.2015 Views

Vehicle Crashworthiness and Occupant Protection - Chapter 3

Vehicle Crashworthiness and Occupant Protection - Chapter 3

Vehicle Crashworthiness and Occupant Protection - Chapter 3

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Vehicle</strong> <strong>Crashworthiness</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Occupant</strong> <strong>Protection</strong><br />

This is of interest as it indicates that the model captured the overall stiffness of<br />

the deforming vehicle structure.<br />

Figure 3.6.4.5 shows the barrier unfiltered force-time pulse. The pulse shape with<br />

its two peaks <strong>and</strong> the times at which they occurred is consistent with experimental<br />

data.<br />

The first peak force almost coincided with the results obtained from one test.<br />

However, the second peak was only 60 percent of the test value. This may be due<br />

to inexact modeling of the engine-to-dash panel interactions.<br />

Subsequent to development of the integrated model, to illustrate its robustness it<br />

was exercised to simulate an NCAP test. Figure 3.6.4.6 shows the model<br />

deformations at 100 ms corresponding to impact with a full rigid barrier from an<br />

initial speed of 35 mph.<br />

Next, the model was exercised to simulate vehicle frontal impact with a rigid pole.<br />

The initial impact speed was 30 mph. Figure 3.6.4.7 shows the initial model set-up<br />

<strong>and</strong> the deformed configuration at 100 ms.<br />

Finally, the model was tested to simulate vehicle impact with an offset rigid barrier.<br />

The initial vehicle speed was 30 mph. The vehicle impact was on the left side with<br />

50 percent barrier overlap. The initial model configuration <strong>and</strong> deformed<br />

configuration at 100 ms is shown in Figure 3.6.4.8. A comparison of frontal vehicle<br />

deformations in time is shown in Figure 3.6.4.9, which clearly demonstrate the<br />

difference in frontal deformations corres-ponding to the previous four impact<br />

scenarios.<br />

3.7 Summary<br />

Although the FE technology for structural mechanics was introduced in the early<br />

sixties, it took about 25 years of additional development to apply it successfully<br />

to crashworthiness simulation of automobile structures. The developments were<br />

mainly in nonlinear problem formulation of shell elements, reduced spatial<br />

integration, explicit time integration, plasticity, <strong>and</strong> contact-impact treatments.<br />

The role of super computers <strong>and</strong> code vectorization was indeed indispensable for<br />

the development of full-scale vehicle models.<br />

The mid-eighties to the mid-nineties time span can be characterized as the<br />

renaissance period of FE crashworthiness models. Generic <strong>and</strong> actual components<br />

of vehicle structures as well as full-scale vehicle models were developed to simulate<br />

Page 148

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!