Public Toilet Strategy 2013 - City of Armadale

ATTACHMENT 3: CRITERIA DETERMINING DEMAND FOR PUBLIC TOILET AT CERTAIN SITE/LOCATION
PRIMARY CRITERIA
GIVEN VALUES
3 6 9 12 15
1.
Does any public toilet exist within
800m/10 min walk of proposed site
Yes, but limited access
Yes but requires
crossing minor barrier
to access
Yes but requires
crossing major barrier
to access
Existing toilet not
suitably accessible for
visitor type
No
2. Associated recreational infrastructure
(BBQ/picnic/play equipment) within
Regional or relevant District Parks
None/Limited
To be upgraded/
installed to stimulate
use within 5 years
To be upgraded/
installed to stimulate
use within 2 years
Significant – established
change in usage pattern
Yes, and usage
demonstrates
demand for toilet
3. Level/likelihood of anti-social behaviour in
surrounding area
Extreme Significant High Average Low/None
4.
Significant surveillance by the public
None Low Medium High Major focus point
SECONDARY CRITERIA
GIVEN VALUES
2 4 6 8 10
5. Median length of stay at location/activity 30 mins 1 Hour 2/3 Hours Half day or greater Meal time venue
6. Number of existing and projected site
users
Unpredictable –
weekly to monthly
Low / Irregular Medium High Very High
7.
Level of supporting services infrastructure
(sewer, water, electricity)
None, alternatives
very limited
None/limited, alternatives
possible but very
costly ($100k plus)
Basic available, costly
to upgrade ($50-$100k)
Available, less costly to
access ($20-$50k)
Available and easy
accessible
($20k and less)
8. Future operating and maintenance costs
of toilet facility
High Medium Low
Score out of 100: _______