13.11.2012 Views

Introduction to Categorical Data Analysis

Introduction to Categorical Data Analysis

Introduction to Categorical Data Analysis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

130 LOGISTIC REGRESSION<br />

Table 4.16. Clinical Trial <strong>Data</strong> for Problem 4.20<br />

Response<br />

Sample<br />

Center Treatment Success Failure Odds Ratio<br />

1 Drug 11 25 1.19<br />

Control 10 27<br />

2 Drug 16 4 1.82<br />

Control 22 10<br />

3 Drug 14 5 4.80<br />

Control 7 12<br />

4 Drug 2 14 2.29<br />

Control 1 16<br />

5 Drug 6 11 ∞<br />

Control 0 12<br />

6 Drug 1 10 ∞<br />

Control 0 10<br />

7 Drug 1 4 2.0<br />

Control 1 8<br />

8 Drug 4 2 0.33<br />

Control 6 1<br />

Source: P. J. Beitler and J. R. Landis, Biometrics, 41: 991–1000, 1985.<br />

b. Conduct the Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel test. Specify the hypotheses, report<br />

the P -value, and interpret.<br />

4.21 In a study designed <strong>to</strong> evaluate whether an educational program makes sexually<br />

active adolescents more likely <strong>to</strong> obtain condoms, adolescents were randomly<br />

assigned <strong>to</strong> two experimental groups. The educational program, involving a<br />

lecture and videotape about transmission of the HIV virus, was provided <strong>to</strong> one<br />

group but not the other. In logistic regression models, fac<strong>to</strong>rs observed <strong>to</strong> influence<br />

a teenager <strong>to</strong> obtain condoms were gender, socioeconomic status, lifetime<br />

number of partners, and the experimental group. Table 4.17 summarizes study<br />

results.<br />

a. Interpret the odds ratio and the related confidence interval for the effect of<br />

group.<br />

b. Find the parameter estimates for the fitted model, using (1, 0) indica<strong>to</strong>r<br />

variables for the first three predic<strong>to</strong>rs. Based on the corresponding confidence<br />

interval for the log odds ratio, determine the standard error for the<br />

group effect.<br />

c. Explain why either the estimate of 1.38 for the odds ratio for gender or the<br />

corresponding confidence interval is incorrect. Show that, if the reported<br />

interval is correct, then 1.38 is actually the log odds ratio, and the estimated<br />

odds ratio equals 3.98.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!