13.11.2012 Views

Introduction to Categorical Data Analysis

Introduction to Categorical Data Analysis

Introduction to Categorical Data Analysis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

366 BRIEF SOLUTIONS TO SOME ODD-NUMBERED PROBLEMS<br />

d. Deviance = 3.25, df = 3, P -value = 0.36, so model fits adequately.<br />

e. 1 − cumulative probability for category 2, which is 0.61.<br />

9. a. There are four nondegenerate cumulative probabilities. When all predic<strong>to</strong>r<br />

values equal 0, cumulative probabilities increase across categories, so logits<br />

increase, as do parameters that specify logits.<br />

b. (i) Religion = none, (ii) Religion = Protestant.<br />

c. For Protestant, 0.09. For None, 0.26.<br />

d. (i) e −1.27 = 0.28; that is, estimated odds that Protestant falls in relatively<br />

more liberal categories (rather than more conservative categories) is 0.28 times<br />

estimated odds for someone with no religious preference. (ii) Estimated odds<br />

ratio comparing Protestants <strong>to</strong> Catholics is 0.95.<br />

11. a. ˆβ =−0.0444 (SE = 0.0190) suggests probability of having relatively less<br />

satisfaction decreases as income increases.<br />

b. ˆβ =−0.0435, very little change. If model holds for underlying logistic latent<br />

variable, model holds with same effect value for every way of defining<br />

outcome categories.<br />

c. Gender estimate of −0.0256 has SE = 0.4344 and Wald statistic = 0.003<br />

(df = 1), so can be dropped.<br />

13. a. Income effect of 0.389 (SE = 0.155) indicates estimated odds of higher of<br />

any two adjacent job satisfaction categories increases as income increases.<br />

b. Estimated income effects are −1.56 for outcome categories 1 and 4, −0.64<br />

for outcome categories 2 and 4, and −0.40 for categories 3 and 4.<br />

c. (a) Treats job satisfaction as ordinal whereas (b) treats job satisfaction as<br />

nominal. Ordinal model is more parsimonious and simpler <strong>to</strong> interpret,<br />

because it has one income effect rather than three.<br />

17. Cumulative logit model with main effects of gender, location, and seat-belt<br />

has estimates 0.545, −0.773, and 0.824; for example, for those wearing a seat<br />

belt, estimated odds that the response is below any particular level of injury are<br />

e 0.824 = 2.3 times the estimated odds for those not wearing seat belts.<br />

21. For cumulative logit model of proportional odds form with Y = happiness and<br />

x = marital status (1 = married, 0 = divorced), ˆβ =−1.076 (SE = 0.116). The<br />

model fits well (e.g., deviance = 0.29 with df = 1).<br />

CHAPTER 7<br />

1. a. G2 = 0.82, X2 = 0.82, df = 1.<br />

b. ˆλ Y 1 = 1.416, ˆλ Y 2 = 0. Given gender, estimated odds of belief in afterlife equal<br />

e1.416 = 4.1.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!