13.11.2012 Views

Introduction to Categorical Data Analysis

Introduction to Categorical Data Analysis

Introduction to Categorical Data Analysis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

304 RANDOM EFFECTS: GENERALIZED LINEAR MIXED MODELS<br />

Table 10.2. Estimates of Probability of Centers Making<br />

a Free Throw, Based on <strong>Data</strong> from First Week of 2005–2006<br />

NBA Season<br />

Player ni pi ˆπi Player ni pi ˆπi<br />

Yao 13 0.769 0.730 Curry 11 0.545 0.663<br />

Frye 10 0.900 0.761 Miller 10 0.900 0.761<br />

Camby 15 0.667 0.696 Haywood 8 0.500 0.663<br />

Okur 14 0.643 0.689 Olowokandi 9 0.889 0.754<br />

Blount 6 0.667 0.704 Mourning 9 0.778 0.728<br />

Mihm 10 0.900 0.761 Wallace 8 0.625 0.692<br />

Ilgauskas 10 0.600 0.682 Ostertag 6 0.167 0.608<br />

Brown 4 1.000 0.748<br />

Note: pi = sample, ˆπi = estimate using random effects model.<br />

Source: nba.com.<br />

vary between 0.17 and 1.0. Relatively extreme sample proportions based on few<br />

observations, such as the sample proportion of 0.17 for Ostertag, shrink more. If you<br />

are a basketball fan, which estimate would you think is more sensible for Ostertag’s<br />

free throw shooting prowess, 0.17 or 0.61?<br />

Are the data consistent with the simpler model, logit(πi) = α, in which πi is<br />

identical for each player? To answer this, we could test H0: σ = 0 for model (10.4).<br />

The usual tests do not apply <strong>to</strong> this hypothesis, however, because ˆσ cannot be negative<br />

and so is not approximately normally distributed about σ under H0. We will learn<br />

how <strong>to</strong> conduct the analysis in Section 10.5.2.<br />

10.2.3 Example: Tera<strong>to</strong>logy Overdispersion Revisited<br />

Section 9.2.4 showed results of a tera<strong>to</strong>logy experiment in which female rats on irondeficient<br />

diets were assigned <strong>to</strong> four groups. Group 1 received only placebo injections.<br />

The other groups received injections of an iron supplement at various schedules. The<br />

rats were made pregnant and then sacrificed after 3 weeks. For each fetus in each rat’s<br />

litter, the response was whether the fetus was dead. Because of unmeasured covariates<br />

that vary among rats in a given treatment, it is natural <strong>to</strong> permit the probability of<br />

death <strong>to</strong> vary from litter <strong>to</strong> litter within each treatment group.<br />

Let yi denote the number dead out of the Ti fetuses in litter i. Let πit denote the<br />

probability of death for fetus t in litter i. Section 9.2.4 used the model<br />

logit(πit) = α + β2zi2 + β3zi3 + β4zi4<br />

where zig = 1 if litter i is in group g and 0 otherwise. The estimates and standard<br />

errors treated the {yi} as binomial. This approach regards the outcomes for fetuses in a<br />

litter as independent and identical, with the same probability of death for each fetus in<br />

each litter within a given treatment group. This is probably unrealistic. Section 9.2.4<br />

used the GEE approach <strong>to</strong> allow observations within a litter <strong>to</strong> be correlated.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!