13.11.2012 Views

Introduction to Categorical Data Analysis

Introduction to Categorical Data Analysis

Introduction to Categorical Data Analysis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

PROBLEMS 171<br />

b. Try <strong>to</strong> fit a main-effects logistic regression model containing all three predic<strong>to</strong>rs.<br />

Explain why the ML estimate for the effect of lymphocytic infiltration<br />

is infinite.<br />

c. Using conditional logistic regression, conduct an exact test of the hypothesis<br />

of no effect of lymphocytic infiltration, controlling for the other variables.<br />

Interpret.<br />

d. Using conditional logistic regression, find a 95% confidence interval for<br />

the effect in (c). Interpret.<br />

5.26 Table 5.15 describes results from a study in which subjects received a drug and<br />

the outcome measures whether the subject became incontinent (y = 1, yes;<br />

y = 0, no). The three explana<strong>to</strong>ry variables are lower urinary tract variables<br />

that represent drug-induced physiological changes.<br />

a. Report the prediction equations when each predic<strong>to</strong>r is used separately in<br />

logistic regressions.<br />

b. Try <strong>to</strong> fit a main-effects logistic regression model containing all three<br />

predic<strong>to</strong>rs. What does your software report for the effects and their standard<br />

errors? (The ML estimates are actually −∞ for x1 and x2 and ∞<br />

for x3.)<br />

c. Use conditional logistic regression <strong>to</strong> find an exact P -value for testing H0:<br />

β3 = 0. [The exact distribution is degenerate, and neither ordinary ML or<br />

exact conditional ML works with these data. For alternative approaches, see<br />

articles by D. M. Potter (Statist. Med., 24: 693–708, 2005) and G. Heinze<br />

and M. Schemper (Statist. Med., 22: 1409–1419, 2002).]<br />

Table 5.15. <strong>Data</strong> from Incontinence Study of<br />

Problem 5.26<br />

y x1 x2 x3 y x1 x2 x3<br />

0 −1.9 −5.3 −43 0 −1.5 3.9 −15<br />

0 −0.1 −5.2 −32 0 0.5 27.5 8<br />

0 0.8 −3.0 −12 0 0.8 −1.6 −2<br />

0 0.9 3.4 1 0 2.3 23.4 14<br />

1 −5.6 −13.1 −1 1 −5.3 −19.8 −33<br />

1 −2.4 1.8 −9 1 −2.3 −7.4 4<br />

1 −2.0 −5.7 −7 1 −1.7 −3.9 13<br />

1 −0.6 −2.4 −7 1 −0.5 −14.5 −12<br />

1 −0.1 −10.2 −5 1 −0.1 −9.9 −11<br />

1 0.4 −17.2 −9 1 0.7 −10.7 −10<br />

1 1.1 −4.5 −15<br />

Source: D. M. Potter, Statist. Med., 24: 693–708, 2005.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!