13.11.2012 Views

Introduction to Categorical Data Analysis

Introduction to Categorical Data Analysis

Introduction to Categorical Data Analysis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CHAPTER 6 365<br />

19. a. logit(π) = α + β1d1 +···+β6d6, where di = 1 for department i and di = 0<br />

otherwise.<br />

b. Model fits poorly.<br />

c. Only lack of fit in Department 1, where more females were admitted than<br />

expected if the model lacking gender effect truly holds.<br />

d. −4.15, so fewer males admitted than expected if model lacking gender effect<br />

truly holds.<br />

e. Males apply in relatively greater numbers <strong>to</strong> departments that have relatively<br />

higher proportions of acceptances.<br />

27. zα/2 = 2.576,zβ = 1.645, and n1 = n2 = 214.<br />

29. logit( ˆπ) =−12.351 + 0.497x. Probability at x = 26.3 is 0.674; probability at<br />

x = 28.4 (i.e., one standard deviation above mean) is 0.854. Odds ratio is 2.83,<br />

so λ = 1.04, δ = 5.1. Then n = 75.<br />

CHAPTER 6<br />

1. a. log( ˆπR/ ˆπD) =−2.3 + 0.5x. Estimated odds of preferring Republicans over<br />

Democrats increase by 65% for every $10,000 increase.<br />

b. ˆπR > ˆπD when annual income >$46,000.<br />

c. ˆπI = 1/[1 + exp(3.3 − 0.2x) + exp(1 + 0.3x)].<br />

3. a. SE values in parentheses<br />

Logit Intercept Size ≤ 2.3 Hancock Oklawaha Trafford<br />

log(πI /πF ) −1.55 1.46(0.40) −1.66(0.61) 0.94(0.47) 1.12(0.49)<br />

log(πR/πF ) −3.31 −0.35(0.58) 1.24(1.19) 2.46(1.12) 2.94(1.12)<br />

log(πB/πF ) −2.09 −0.63(0.64) 0.70(0.78) −0.65(1.20) 1.09(0.84)<br />

log(πO/πF ) −1.90 0.33(0.45) 0.83(0.56) 0.01(0.78) 1.52(0.62)<br />

5. a. Job satisfaction tends <strong>to</strong> increase at higher x1 and lower x2 and x3.<br />

b. x1 = 4 and x2 = x3 = 1.<br />

7. a. Two cumulative probabilities <strong>to</strong> model and hence 2 intercept parameters. Proportional<br />

odds have same predic<strong>to</strong>r effects for each cumulative probability,<br />

so only one effect reported for income.<br />

b. Estimated odds of being at low end of scale (less happy) decrease as income<br />

increases.<br />

c. LR statistic = 0.89 with df = 1, and P -value = 0.35. It is plausible that<br />

income has no effect on marital happiness.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!