YAVAPAI COUNTY, ARIZONA Federal Emergency ... - FEMA Region 9

More documents

Recommendations

Info

TABLE 6 - MANNING'S "n" VALUES Flooding Source Channel Overbanks Agua Fria River (At Black Canyon City) 0.025-0.055 0.075-0.150 Agua Fria River (At Dewey-Humboldt) 0.020-0.045 0.040-0.065 Agua Fria River (At Prescott Valley) 0.020-0.030 0.040-0.050 American Wash 0.025-0.035 0.035-0.055 Ash Fork Draw Wash 0.030-0.035 0.055-0.0100 Aspen Creek 0.055 0.095 Beaver Creek (At Camp Verde) 0.050-0.060 0.085-0.100 Beaver Creek (At Lake Montezuma) 0.045-0.085 0.040-0.125 Big Bug Creek 0.035-0.060 0.090-0.150 Big Chino Valley East Streams 0.035-0.040 0.035-0.040 Big Chino Valley West Streams 0.035 0.035-0.040 Big Chino Wash 0.025-0.030 0.030-0.040 Bitter Creek 0.040 0.050 Bitter Creek - South Fork 0.040 0.050 Black Canyon Creek 0.025-0.055 0.065-0.150 Boynton Canyon 0.040-0.065 0.065-0.080 Chino Valley Stream 0.030-0.040 0.035-0.045 Chino Valley Stream, East 0.032 0.032 Chino Valley Stream (Tributary) 0.030-0.045 0.035-0.050 Clipper Wash 0.020-0.035 0.050-0.075 Dead Mule Canyon Wash 0.030 0.060 Deception Wash 0.040 0.050 Del Monte Wash 0.040 0.065 Dry Creek 0.030-0.060 0.075-0.100 Granite Creek 0.014-0.035 0.075-0.100 Hassayampa River 0.025-0.060 0.035-0.070 Jacks Canyon 0.035-0.070 0.045-0.125 Lynx Creek 0.035-0.065 0.075-0.150 Manzanita Creek 0.050 0.090-0.125 Martinez Wash 0.025-0.060 0.090 Miller Creek 0.035-0.090 0.060-0.100 Model Creek 0.035 0.050-0.135 Navajo Drive Wash 0.020-0.030 0.050-0.070 North Navajo Drive Wash 0.040-0.050 0.040-0.050 Oak Creek 0.030-0.080 0.040-0.180 Oak Wash 0.035 0.040 Railroad Wash 0.013-0.065 0.045-0.065 Ramsgate Wash 0.035 0.040-0.060 Russell Wash 0.035-0.045 0.045-0.070 Santa Cruz Wash 0.040 0.045 45
TABLE 6 - MANNING'S "n" VALUES - continued Flooding Source Channel Overbanks Silver Springs Gulch 0.040-0.050 0.045-0.065 Skull Valley Wash 0.015-0.040 0.060-0.065 Sols Wash 0.018-0.050 0.055-0.090 South Rocky Boy Wash 0.025-0.043 0.025-0.061 Spring Creek 0.040-0.055 0.050-0.125 Texas Gulch Main Stem 0.035-0.045 0.037-0.045 Texas Gulch West Branch 0.035 0.040 West Clear Creek 0.035-0.050 0.050-0.120 Wet Beaver Creek 0.035-0.060 0.060-0.125 Williamson Valley Wash 0.030 0.035-0.040 Willow Creek 0.045 0.060 Zalesky Wash Main Stem 0.028-0.045 0.063-0.140 TABLE 7 – TOPOGRAPHIC MAPPING Community Scale Contour Interval Flooding Type Yavapai County (West Clear Creek, Wet Beaver Creek) 1:2,400 5 feet Detail Yavapai County (All other study areas except Verde River) 1:2,400 4 feet Detail Yavapai County (South Rocky Boy Wash Restudy) 1:4,800 4 feet Detail Yavapai County (Big Chino Wash Tributaries Restudy) 1:2,400 2 feet Detail Yavapai County (East Tributary of Chino Valley Stream, Texas Gulch Restudy) 1:4,800 4 feet Detail Yavapai County (Sols Wash) 1:200 2 feet Detail Town of Camp Verde (1 st Restudy) 1:4,800 4 feet Detail Town of Camp Verde ( Beaver Creek) 1:2,400 5 feet Detail Town of Camp Verde (1 st Restudy) 1:2,400 4 feet Detail Town of Chino Valley 1:1,200 2 feet Detail Town of Clarkdale 1:2,400 2 feet Detail City of Cottonwood 1:2,400 2 feet Detail City of Cottonwood 1:4,800 5 feet Detail City of Cottonwood 1:8,400 (Aerial Photos) Approximate City of Prescott (Aspen Creek, Manzanita Creek) 1:4,800 4 feet Detail 46
Page 1 and 2: YAVAPAI COUNTY, ARIZONA AND INCORPO
Page 3 and 4: TABLE OF CONTENTS - Volume 1 Page 1
Page 5 and 6: TABLE OF CONTENTS - Volume 3 - cont
Page 7 and 8: TABLE OF CONTENTS - Volume 5 - cont
Page 9 and 10: authority and acknowledgments for e
Page 11 and 12: In the March 29, 1983, revision, up
Page 13 and 14: The September 20, 1996, revision al
Page 15 and 16: update corporate limits, to change
Page 17 and 18: TABLE 2 - STREAMS STUDIED BY DETAIL
Page 19 and 20: TABLE 3 - LETTERS OF MAP CHANGE - c
Page 21 and 22: Precipitation in the study area is
Page 23 and 24: TABLE 4 - HISTORIC RECORDED DISCHAR
Page 25 and 26: The Verde Lakes Estates in the Town
Page 27 and 28: Problems created by large magnitude
Page 29 and 30: All flooding sources were analyzed
Page 31 and 32: approximately 1,600 feet downstream
Page 33 and 34: TABLE 5 - SUMMARY OF DISCHARGES FLO
Page 35 and 36: TABLE 5 - SUMMARY OF DISCHARGES - c
Page 47 and 48: Mapping, Inc. (Kenney Aerial Mappin
Page 49 and 50: 1985. It was determined from the si
Page 51: Values for the roughness coefficien
Page 55 and 56: To minimize the impact of the levee
Page 57 and 58: ecommended as the approximate areas
Page 59 and 60: TABLE 8 - VERTICAL DATUM CONVERSION
Page 61 and 62: Approximate 1-percent annual chance
Page 63 and 64: e feasible in view of extremely hig
Page 65 and 66: average depths are between 1 and 3
Page 67 and 68: COMMUNITY NAME INITIAL IDENTIFICATI
Page 69 and 70: The only other study completed for
Page 71 and 72: Cooper Aerial Surveys, Aerial Photo
Page 73 and 74: Kenny Aerial Mapping, Topographic M
Page 75 and 76: U.S. Department of the Army, Corps
Page 77 and 78: Joes Hill, Arizona (1969); King Can
Page 79 and 80: Pipe Creek Railroad Wash Silver Spr
Page 81 and 82: Manning’s “n” values were ass
Page 83 and 84: FLOODING SOURCE FLOODWAY 1-PERCENT-
Page 85 and 86: FLOODING SOURCE FLOODWAY 1-PERCENT-
Page 87 and 88: TABLE 9 FLOODING SOURCE FLOODWAY 1-
Page 93: TABLE 9 FLOODING SOURCE FLOODWAY 1-

YAVAPAI COUNTY, ARIZONA Federal Emergency ... - FEMA Region 9

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?