Nearshore Habitat Use by Juvenile Chinook Salmon in Lentic ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

REFERENCES Allen, M.A. 2000. Seasonal microhabitat use by juvenile spring Chinook salmon in the Yakima River basin, Washington. Rivers 7:314-332. Becker, C.D. 1973. Food and growth parameters of juvenile Chinook salmon, Oncorhynchus tshawytscha, in central Columbia River. Fishery Bulletin 71:387-400. Brusven, M.A., W.R. Meehan, and J.F. Ward. 1986. Summer use of simulated undercut banks by juvenile Chinook salmon in an artificial Idaho channel. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 6:32-37. Butler, R.L. and V.M. Hawthorne. 1968. The reactions of dominant trout to changes in overhead artificial cover. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 97:37-41. Chesson, J. 1978. Measuring preference in selective predation. Ecology 59: 211-215. Christiansen, K.A. 1996. Aquatic Collembola. Pages 113-125 in R.W. Merritt and K.W. Cummins, editors. An introduction to aquatic insects of North America. Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company, Dubuque, Iowa. Colle, D. E., R. L. Cailteux, and J. V. Shireman. 1989. Distribution of Florida largemouth bass in a lake after elimination of all submerged aquatic vegetation. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 9:213-218. Cortés, E. 1997. A critical review of methods of studying fish feeding based on analysis of stomach contents: application to elasmobranch fishes. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 54:726-738. DeVries, P., F. Goetz, K. Fresh, and D. Seiler. 2004. Evidence of a lunar gravitation cue on timing of estuarine entry by Pacific salmon smolts. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 133:1379-1395. Fausch, K.D. 1993. Experimental analysis of microhabitat selection by juvenile steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) and coho salmon (O. kisutch) in a British Columbia stream. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 50:1198-1207. Fausch, K.D. and M.K. Young. 1995. Evolutionarily significant units and movement of resident stream fishes: a cautionary tale. Pages 360-370 in J.L. Nielsen, editor. Evolution and the aquatic ecosystem: defining unique units in population conservation. American Fisheries Society Symposium 17, Bethesda, Maryland. Fresh, K.L. 2000. Use of Lake Washington by juvenile Chinook salmon, 1999 and 2000. Proceedings of the Chinook salmon in the greater Lake Washington Watershed 89
workshop, Shoreline, Washington, November 8-9, 2000, King County, Seattle, Washington. Fresh, K. L., D. Rothaus, K. W. Mueller, and C. Waldbillig. 2001. Habitat utilization by predators, with emphasis on smallmouth bass, in the littoral zone of Lake Washington. Draft report, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Olympia. Gibson, R.J. and M.H.A. Keenleyside. 1966. Responses to light of young Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) and brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis). Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 23:1007-1021. Gibson, R.J. and G. Power. 1975. Selection by brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) and juvenile Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) of shade related to water depth. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 32:1652-1656. Glass, N.R. 1971. Computer analysis of predator energetics in the largemouth bass. Pages 325- 363 in B.C. Patten, editor. Systems analysis and simulation in ecology, volume 1. Academic Press, New York. Grant, J.W.A. and D.L. Noakes. 1987. Escape behaviour and use of cover by young-of-the-year brook trout, Salvelinus fontinalis. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 44:1390-1396. Graynoth, E. 1999. Recruitment and distribution of juvenile salmonids in Lake Coleridge, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 33:205-219. Helfman, G.S. 1981. The advantage to fishes of hovering in shade. Copeia 1981:392-400. Hubert, W.A. and R.T. Lackey. 1980. Habitat of adult smallmouth bass in a Tennessee River reservoir. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 109:364-370. Johnson, J.H. 1981. Comparative food selection by coexisting coho salmon, Chinook salmon and rainbow trout in a tributary of Lake Ontario. New York Fish and Game Journal 28:150-161. Johnson, J.H. 1983. Food of recently stocked subyearling Chinook salmon in Lake Ontario. New York Fish and Game Journal 30:115-116. Koehler, M.E. 2002. Diet and prey resources of juvenile Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) rearing in the litoral zone of an urban lake. Master’s thesis, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington. Levins, R. 1968. Evolution in changing environments: some theoretical explorations. Princeton University Press, Princeton. 90
Page 1 and 2:
U.S. Fish and IU.S. Wildlife FishSe
Page 3 and 4:
SUMMARY In 2003 and 2004, we contin
Page 5 and 6:
An overhanging vegetation/small woo
Page 7 and 8:
Table of Contents Page SUMMARY ....
Page 9 and 10:
List of Figures Figure Page FIGURE
Page 11 and 12:
FIGURE 37.—Water column depth (m)
Page 13 and 14:
The major tributary to Lake Washing
Page 15 and 16:
Fry emerge from their redds from Ja
Page 17 and 18:
FIGURE 2.—Location of index sites
Page 19 and 20:
most dates (Figure 4). Unlike 2002,
Page 21 and 22:
Chinook/m 2 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 Wes
Page 23 and 24:
0.3 Mercer Island Chinook/m 2 0.2 0
Page 25 and 26:
particularly valuable. Shoreline im
Page 27 and 28:
FIGURE 8.—Map of south Lake Washi
Page 29 and 30:
FIGURE 10—Map of south Lake Washi
Page 31 and 32:
# of marked Chinook 40 30 20 10 0 A
Page 33 and 34:
CHAPTER 3. RESTORATION SITES Introd
Page 35 and 36:
Beer Sheva Park.—At Beer Sheva Pa
Page 37 and 38:
Results Seward Park, 2003.—In 200
Page 39 and 40:
4 3.5 Chinook/100 m 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0
Page 41 and 42:
Martha Washington Park, 2003.—In
Page 43 and 44:
120 Chinook/100 m 100 80 60 40 20 s
Page 45 and 46:
snorkeling and scuba diving were co
Page 47 and 48:
Water column depth (m) . 0.80 0.60
Page 49 and 50: CHAPTER 5. FEEDING AT TRIBUTARY MOU
Page 51 and 52: FIGURE 28.—Location of four south
Page 53 and 54: FIGURE 29.—Photos of sites used t
Page 55 and 56: sampling. At night, Chinook salmon
Page 57 and 58: TABLE 5.—Diet overlap indices (C)
Page 59 and 60: TABLE 7.—Diet overlap indices (C)
Page 61 and 62: TABLE 10.—Diet composition of juv
Page 63 and 64: The lack of a large difference betw
Page 65 and 66: CHAPTER 6. USE OF NONNATAL TRIBUTAR
Page 67 and 68: shallow to snorkel were surveyed th
Page 69 and 70: Number of Chinook ff 700 600 500 40
Page 71 and 72: column depth used by Chinook salmon
Page 73 and 74: Chinook / m . 5 4 3 2 1 2003 - upst
Page 75 and 76: TABLE 13.—Diet overlap index (C)
Page 77 and 78: (P. Castle, WDFW, unpublished data)
Page 79 and 80: FIGURE 41.—Placement of Scotch br
Page 81 and 82: FIGURE 43.—Photo of a group of ju
Page 83 and 84: CHAPTER 8. LAKE QUINAULT SURVEYS In
Page 85 and 86: FIGURE 45.—Photos of large woody
Page 87 and 88: Similar to April surveys, the nears
Page 89 and 90: Chinook / 100m . 500 400 300 200 10
Page 91 and 92: Tabor and Wurtsbaugh (1991) conclud
Page 93 and 94: FIGURE 48.—Location of south Lake
Page 95 and 96: FIGURE 49.—Conducting visual obse
Page 97 and 98: FIGURE 52.—Photo of a group of ju
Page 99: ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We wish to thank He
Page 103 and 104: Paron, D.G., and E. Nelson. 2001. S
Page 105 and 106: Werner, E.E., and D.J. Hall. 1988.
show all

Nearshore Habitat Use by Juvenile Chinook Salmon in Lentic ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?