28.01.2015 Views

Nearshore Habitat Use by Juvenile Chinook Salmon in Lentic ...

Nearshore Habitat Use by Juvenile Chinook Salmon in Lentic ...

Nearshore Habitat Use by Juvenile Chinook Salmon in Lentic ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

TABLE 10.—Diet composition of juvenile <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>ook</strong> salmon at the mouth of May Creek, 2004 under two<br />

streamflow conditions. Base streamflow samples were collected on March 31 and April 1 and the high<br />

streamflow samples were collected on March 26. n = the number of stomach samples analyzed; the range<br />

of <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>ook</strong> salmon lengths is also given; %N = percent number; %O = percent occurrence; %W = percent<br />

weight; %IRI = percent <strong>in</strong>dex of relative importance.<br />

Base flow<br />

High flow<br />

n = 10, range = 40-64 mm FL n = 10, range = 51-62 mm FL<br />

Prey group %N %O %W %IRI %N %O %W %IRI<br />

Insecta<br />

Diptera<br />

Chironomid pupae and adults 62.7 100 79.7 85.6 56.7 100 61.2 70.1<br />

Chironomid larvae 3.7 40 1.6 1.3 17.9 70 16.0 14.1<br />

Other aquatic diptera 0 0 0 0 2.2 30 1.8 0.7<br />

Ephemeroptera 1.5 20 1.0 0.3 5.2 50 4.6 2.9<br />

Collembola 4.5 30 0.8 1.0 2.2 20 0.5 0.3<br />

Other aquatic <strong>in</strong>sects 0.7 10 4.6 0.3 3.0 30 4.3 1.3<br />

Homoptera (Aphididae) 0 0 0 0 0.7 10 0.8 0.1<br />

Other terrestrial <strong>in</strong>sects 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0<br />

Crustacea<br />

Cladocera - Daphnia 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0<br />

Other crustaceans 0.7 10 0.3 0.1 0.7 10 0.2 0.1<br />

Hydrachnida 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0<br />

Oligochaeta 0 0 0 0 8.2 90 6.1 7.7<br />

Other 26.1 50 11.9 11.4 3.0 60 4.4 2.7<br />

The diet at the mouth of Taylor Creek dur<strong>in</strong>g high streamflow conditions was<br />

significantly different than the lakeshore on the same date as well as Taylor Creek dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />

base flow conditions (Table 11). Chironomid larvae were the most important prey item<br />

and represented approximately half of the prey items consumed. Other prey items<br />

<strong>in</strong>cluded chironomid pupae and adults, oligochaetes, spr<strong>in</strong>gtails, and mayflies. The diet<br />

breath <strong>in</strong>dex was 4.09, which was higher than any other creek mouth or lake sample.<br />

Supplemental surveys of Kennydale Creek and Taylor Creek were conducted on<br />

April 20, 2004. <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>ook</strong> salmon were also collected at a lakeshore reference site, north<br />

Gene Coulon Park. At the mouth of Taylor Creek, little else was present <strong>in</strong> the diet<br />

except chironomid pupae and adults (97% <strong>by</strong> weight). Chironomid pupae and adults<br />

were also the dom<strong>in</strong>ant prey item at the mouth of Kennydale Creek (58% <strong>by</strong> weight) and<br />

the lakeshore reference site (83% <strong>by</strong> weight). However unlike Taylor Creek, aphids<br />

made up a substantial part of the diet (Kennydale Creek, 25% <strong>by</strong> weight; lakeshore, 7%<br />

<strong>by</strong> weight).<br />

50

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!