- Page 1 and 2:
U.S. Fish and IU.S. Wildlife FishSe
- Page 3 and 4:
SUMMARY In 2003 and 2004, we contin
- Page 5 and 6:
An overhanging vegetation/small woo
- Page 7 and 8:
Table of Contents Page SUMMARY ....
- Page 9 and 10:
List of Figures Figure Page FIGURE
- Page 11 and 12:
FIGURE 37.—Water column depth (m)
- Page 13 and 14:
The major tributary to Lake Washing
- Page 15 and 16:
Fry emerge from their redds from Ja
- Page 17 and 18:
FIGURE 2.—Location of index sites
- Page 19 and 20:
most dates (Figure 4). Unlike 2002,
- Page 21 and 22:
Chinook/m 2 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 Wes
- Page 23 and 24:
0.3 Mercer Island Chinook/m 2 0.2 0
- Page 25 and 26:
particularly valuable. Shoreline im
- Page 27 and 28:
FIGURE 8.—Map of south Lake Washi
- Page 29 and 30:
FIGURE 10—Map of south Lake Washi
- Page 31 and 32:
# of marked Chinook 40 30 20 10 0 A
- Page 33 and 34:
CHAPTER 3. RESTORATION SITES Introd
- Page 35 and 36:
Beer Sheva Park.—At Beer Sheva Pa
- Page 37 and 38:
Results Seward Park, 2003.—In 200
- Page 39 and 40:
4 3.5 Chinook/100 m 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0
- Page 41 and 42:
Martha Washington Park, 2003.—In
- Page 43 and 44:
120 Chinook/100 m 100 80 60 40 20 s
- Page 45 and 46:
snorkeling and scuba diving were co
- Page 47 and 48:
Water column depth (m) . 0.80 0.60
- Page 49 and 50:
CHAPTER 5. FEEDING AT TRIBUTARY MOU
- Page 51 and 52:
FIGURE 28.—Location of four south
- Page 53 and 54:
FIGURE 29.—Photos of sites used t
- Page 55 and 56: sampling. At night, Chinook salmon
- Page 57 and 58: TABLE 5.—Diet overlap indices (C)
- Page 59 and 60: TABLE 7.—Diet overlap indices (C)
- Page 61 and 62: TABLE 10.—Diet composition of juv
- Page 63 and 64: The lack of a large difference betw
- Page 65 and 66: CHAPTER 6. USE OF NONNATAL TRIBUTAR
- Page 67 and 68: shallow to snorkel were surveyed th
- Page 69 and 70: Number of Chinook ff 700 600 500 40
- Page 71 and 72: column depth used by Chinook salmon
- Page 73 and 74: Chinook / m . 5 4 3 2 1 2003 - upst
- Page 75 and 76: TABLE 13.—Diet overlap index (C)
- Page 77 and 78: (P. Castle, WDFW, unpublished data)
- Page 79 and 80: FIGURE 41.—Placement of Scotch br
- Page 81 and 82: FIGURE 43.—Photo of a group of ju
- Page 83 and 84: CHAPTER 8. LAKE QUINAULT SURVEYS In
- Page 85 and 86: FIGURE 45.—Photos of large woody
- Page 87 and 88: Similar to April surveys, the nears
- Page 89 and 90: Chinook / 100m . 500 400 300 200 10
- Page 91 and 92: Tabor and Wurtsbaugh (1991) conclud
- Page 93 and 94: FIGURE 48.—Location of south Lake
- Page 95 and 96: FIGURE 49.—Conducting visual obse
- Page 97 and 98: FIGURE 52.—Photo of a group of ju
- Page 99 and 100: ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We wish to thank He
- Page 101 and 102: workshop, Shoreline, Washington, No
- Page 103 and 104: Paron, D.G., and E. Nelson. 2001. S
- Page 105: Werner, E.E., and D.J. Hall. 1988.