28.01.2015 Views

Nearshore Habitat Use by Juvenile Chinook Salmon in Lentic ...

Nearshore Habitat Use by Juvenile Chinook Salmon in Lentic ...

Nearshore Habitat Use by Juvenile Chinook Salmon in Lentic ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

most dates (Figure 4). Unlike 2002, large numbers of juvenile <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>ook</strong> salmon were<br />

observed <strong>in</strong> February. Large numbers were observed as early as February 4 and were<br />

present at all sites except Mt. Baker and Chism, the two furthest north sites. A high<br />

streamflow event <strong>in</strong> the Cedar River from January 31 to February 6, coupled with a high<br />

adult return <strong>in</strong> 2002 had apparently resulted <strong>in</strong> large numbers of fry mov<strong>in</strong>g downstream<br />

<strong>in</strong> early February, which were also observed at the fry trap (Seiler et al. 2005a).<br />

In June, there was no relationship between <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>ook</strong> salmon abundance and<br />

distance to the mouth of the Cedar River (Figure 3; log regression, r 2 = 0.0012).<br />

Generally, <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>ook</strong> salmon abundance <strong>in</strong> June was higher on the west shorel<strong>in</strong>e sites<br />

(Figure 3; mean, east = 0.14 fish/m 2 , west = 0.33 fish/m 2 ) but they were not statistically<br />

different (Mann-Whitney U test = 2.0, P = 0.83).<br />

From February to April, densities of <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>ook</strong> salmon were usually considerably<br />

higher <strong>in</strong> the 0.4-m transect than the 0.7-m transect. For example, at the two southern<br />

sites (Gene Coulon and 113 th St.) the density <strong>in</strong> the 0.4-m transect was 3.2 to 77 times<br />

higher than <strong>in</strong> the 0.7-m transect (Figure 5). In May and June, <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>ook</strong> salmon were<br />

commonly found along both the 0.4- and 0.7-m depth contours.<br />

2004 surveys.-- Few <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>ook</strong> salmon were observed at the sewer replacement<br />

sites on Mercer Island (north and northwest sites) until May 24 (Figure 6). Substantially<br />

more <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>ook</strong> salmon were observed at the east Mercer Island site than at either of the<br />

sewer replacement sites. Between February 7 and May 10, juvenile <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>ook</strong> salmon<br />

were observed at the east Mercer Island site (mean density, 0.045 fish/m 2 ) on each survey<br />

night; whereas they were only present on 2 of 8 nights at the northwest site (mean<br />

density, 0.0042 fish/m 2 ) and on 1 of 5 nights at the north site (mean density, 0.0008<br />

fish/m 2 ). On June 10, several <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>ook</strong> salmon were observed at each Mercer Island site<br />

and the density at each site was substantially higher than at the two east shorel<strong>in</strong>e sites<br />

(Figure 6). Many of these fish may have been Issaquah hatchery fish, which had been<br />

released <strong>in</strong> late May.<br />

Abundance of <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>ook</strong> salmon at Gene Coulon and Kennydale <strong>in</strong> 2004 was<br />

generally lower than either 2002 or 2003 (Figure 7). Peak abundance <strong>in</strong> Gene Coulon<br />

was 1.14 fish/m 2 <strong>in</strong> 2002 and 0.80 fish/m 2 <strong>in</strong> 2003; whereas it was only 0.27 fish/m 2 <strong>in</strong><br />

2004. In contrast, 2004 abundance of <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>ook</strong> salmon at the east Mercer Island site was<br />

generally the same as or higher than 2002 or 2003.<br />

8

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!