28.01.2015 Views

Nearshore Habitat Use by Juvenile Chinook Salmon in Lentic ...

Nearshore Habitat Use by Juvenile Chinook Salmon in Lentic ...

Nearshore Habitat Use by Juvenile Chinook Salmon in Lentic ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CHAPTER 6. USE OF NONNATAL TRIBUTARIES<br />

Introduction and Methods<br />

The lower reaches of several nonnatal tributaries were surveyed <strong>in</strong> 2002. <strong>Juvenile</strong><br />

<strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>ook</strong> salmon commonly used the tributary delta areas with<strong>in</strong> the lake but they were<br />

only found <strong>in</strong> the lotic environments of a few tributaries (Tabor et al. 2004b). Nonnatal<br />

tributaries that had a high abundance of juvenile <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>ook</strong> salmon were small- to mediumsized<br />

streams, which had a low gradient and were close to the mouth of the natal system.<br />

In 2003 and 2004, we surveyed Johns Creek and Culvert Creek to collect additional<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation on the use of nonnatal tributaries. Johns Creek was surveyed to determ<strong>in</strong>e if<br />

the tributary is used extensively from year to year and to collect some <strong>in</strong>formation on<br />

<strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>ook</strong> salmon habitat use that could be used to design restoration projects of other<br />

nonnatal tributaries. For example, the City of Seattle has proposed to daylight the mouth<br />

and lower 100 m of Mapes Creek (currently <strong>in</strong> a culvert and enters the lake a few meters<br />

below the lake surface), yet little <strong>in</strong>formation is available on what type of habitat<br />

conditions would be best for <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>ook</strong> salmon. In 2004, we also surveyed Culvert Creek<br />

because it is also a small, low-gradient creek that is close to the mouth of the Cedar<br />

River; however, the creek is located entirely with<strong>in</strong> a culvert. The creek is located<br />

approximately 0.65 km north of Johns Creek.<br />

Johns Creek.—Johns Creek is located <strong>in</strong> Gene Coulon Park <strong>in</strong> the southeast<br />

corner of Lake Wash<strong>in</strong>gton, 1.5 km from the mouth of the Cedar River. Typical w<strong>in</strong>ter<br />

streamflow is about 0.8 cfs (Tabor et al. 2004b). <strong>Juvenile</strong> <strong>Ch<strong>in</strong>ook</strong> salmon use the lower<br />

460 m of the stream (Tabor et al. 2004b). Upstream of this, there are two equal-sized<br />

streams that appear to be completely <strong>in</strong> culverts.<br />

In 2003 and 2004, we repeatedly surveyed the same 260-m long reach that was<br />

surveyed <strong>in</strong> 2002 (Tabor et al. 2004b). The downstream end of the study reach was the<br />

lake. There was no developed delta unlike other tributaries to Lake Wash<strong>in</strong>gton. The<br />

upstream end was a large culvert near the entrance to Gene Coulon Park. The study<br />

reach was del<strong>in</strong>eated <strong>in</strong>to habitat units, which were either classified as a convergence<br />

pool, scour pool, glide, or riffle. The convergence pool was the lower 61 to 136 m of the<br />

<strong>in</strong>dex reach that the water level was directly <strong>in</strong>fluenced <strong>by</strong> the lake level (Figure 31). As<br />

the lake rose from February to June, the convergence pool grew progressively larger.<br />

Scour pools were other pools upstream of the convergence pool that had a maximum<br />

depth > 0.35 m. Glides or shallow pools were other slow water habitats that had a<br />

maximum depth < 0.35 m (Figure 31). The maximum pool depth of 0.35 m was adapted<br />

from Timber-Fish-Wildlife (TFW) stream ambient monitor<strong>in</strong>g methodology (Pleus et al.<br />

1999). For a stream the size of Johns Creek (5- to- 10-m bankfull stream width), the<br />

authors recommended pools have a residual pool depth of 0.25 m (residual pool depth =<br />

max. pool depth–outlet pool depth). Because the outlet depth of pools was<br />

approximately 0.1 m deep, we used a maximum pool depth as > 0.35 m. Riffles were<br />

54

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!