Salafiyyah is not a Hizbi (partisan) Madhhab - QSEP

More documents

Recommendations

Info

to a Sunnah or an early Ijma), then it should be denounced in the sense that its weakness must be pointed out. This is the view of those who say that there can only be one correct ruling and such is the saying of the Salaf and the Fuqaha in general. With regard to actions; If the act is against a Sunnah or Ijma, then it is obligatory to denounce it too, according to the degrees of Inkaar (condemnation). As for, if the act is not against a Sunnah or Ijma, and Ijtihad is feasible, then there is NO denunciation upon whether one acts upon that view as Mujtahid or Muqallid (follower of a Mujtahid). This confusion (that there is no denunciation in matters where there is a difference of scholarly opinion) arose because the one, who holds this issue, deems that (all) issues of disagreement are issues of Ijtihad, just like some groups of people also believe. The correct view – which is also held by the Imams – is that issues of Ijtihad are those, concerning which there is no Daleel which is obligatory to be followed with a clear obligation, like an authentic Hadeeth which is not contradicted by a Hadeeth of similar strength. So, in the absence of such evidence, Ijtihad is feasible due to contradictory proofs or hiddenness of the proof." [end of abridged quote from, Bayaan al-Daleel ala Batlaan altTahleel (p. 210-211)] 53
Shaikhul-Islam also said in Majmoo al-Fatawa: "Issues of Ijtihad; whosoever follows the saying of some of the scholars, is not to be denounced or abandoned. And whosoever, follows one of the two opinions is not to be denounced." [Majmoo al-Fataawa (20/207)] Imam Ibnil-Qayyim (rahimahullah) wrote: "Their view: 'there is no Inkaar in issues of Khilaaf' is incorrect… How can a Faqeeh say 'there is no Inkaar in issues of khilaaf', while the Fuqaha of all groups have clearly stated that the ruling of a judge must be refuted if it opposes the Book or Sunnah – even if some scholars agree with it! As for, if there is no Sunnah or Ijma and Ijtihad is feasible, then there is no denunciation upon whether one acts upon that view as Mujtahid or Muqallid (follower of a Mujtahid)… Issues in which the Salaf and the Khalaf have disagreed, and we are sure that one of the two opinions is sound, are numerous like: The pregnant woman's Iddah ends with child-birth. Consummation of marriage with the second husband is a condition for the woman's becoming permissible for the first husband. Ghusl becomes obligatory merely due to penetration, even if there is no ejaculation. Riba al-Fadl (a kind of interest) is Haraam. Mut'ah marriage is Haraam. Nabeedh (drink made from dates) that causes intoxication is Haraam. A Muslim cannot be killed (in retaliation) for a disbeliever. 54
Page 2:
What is Salafiyyah | Why Salafiyyah
Page 5 and 6: Further, towards the end of the boo
Page 7 and 8: َ ٓ May Allah make this booklet a
Page 9 and 10: ْ ُ َ ُ َ َ ِ ُ ْ ُ َ ُ
Page 11 and 12: How one's Approach and Way becomes
Page 13 and 14: The Salafi Attitude with regards to
Page 15 and 16: Then he (ash-Shatibi) said, "For th
Page 17 and 18: Umar) is a disagreement which canno
Page 19 and 20: The second (reason) is true (i.e.,
Page 21 and 22: ___________________________________
Page 23 and 24: How do the Khalaf derive their doub
Page 25 and 26: َ َ ُ َ َ ِ َ َ ّ ُ ُ ْ
Page 27 and 28: An Example of Distorting an Authent
Page 29 and 30: ٓ ٔ ٔ ٔ The Way Out of Deriving
Page 31 and 32: Conclusion*: If the above is clear
Page 33 and 34: How fortunate is he who follows the
Page 35 and 36: From amongst these (agreed upon) be
Page 37 and 38: egards to differences) Look at thei
Page 39 and 40: wisdom, fair-preaching and dialogue
Page 41 and 42: Messenger with regards to innovatin
Page 43 and 44: It is so, because al-Firqah an-Naji
Page 45 and 46: Arguing on Fiqhi issues, claming th
Page 47 and 48: Second, personally, the Du'aat shou
Page 49 and 50: Appendix: 4 Replying to those who s
Page 51 and 52: Permissibility of Nikaah at-Tahleel
Page 53: "With regard to these issues of Ijt
Page 57 and 58: The Imams have stated in many of th
Page 59 and 60: Can it be said 'there is no Inkaar
Page 61 and 62: Khilaaf Qawi is that concerning whi
Page 63 and 64: Appendix 5: Beware of the Scholar's
Page 65 and 66: "If the issue is related to an Alim
Page 67 and 68: Ibn Khuzaymah ( الله ‏(رحم
Page 69 and 70: When the Prophet entered al-Ka'bah
Page 71 and 72: opinion —while Imam Abu Hanifa di
Page 73 and 74: So, if asking the people of knowled
Page 75 and 76: een guided." [Saheeh Muslim (1450)]
Page 77 and 78: Appendix: 5 Do not constrict the sc
Page 79 and 80: one particular way as is done by so
show all

Salafiyyah is not a Hizbi (partisan) Madhhab - QSEP

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?