28.01.2015 Views

Rangeland condition and feed resources in Metema District, North ...

Rangeland condition and feed resources in Metema District, North ...

Rangeland condition and feed resources in Metema District, North ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Table 20. Common <strong>and</strong> dom<strong>in</strong>ant grass species identified by farm<strong>in</strong>g systems<br />

<strong>and</strong> different graz<strong>in</strong>g types <strong>in</strong> <strong>Metema</strong> 39<br />

Table 21. Common <strong>and</strong> dom<strong>in</strong>ant woody species <strong>and</strong> their percentage<br />

composition by farm<strong>in</strong>g system <strong>in</strong> different graz<strong>in</strong>g areas <strong>in</strong> <strong>Metema</strong> 40<br />

Table 22. Percentage of height class (metres) distribution of trees <strong>and</strong> shrubs<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>Metema</strong> 41<br />

Table 23. Herbaceous species composition (% DM biomass) <strong>and</strong> their desirability<br />

by graz<strong>in</strong>g type <strong>in</strong> cotton–livestock farm<strong>in</strong>g system <strong>in</strong> <strong>Metema</strong> 42<br />

Table 24. Woody species <strong>and</strong> percentage composition <strong>in</strong> different graz<strong>in</strong>g system<br />

<strong>in</strong> cotton–livestock farm<strong>in</strong>g system <strong>in</strong> <strong>Metema</strong> 44<br />

Table 25. Herbaceous species composition (% DM biomass) <strong>and</strong> their desirability<br />

by graz<strong>in</strong>g type <strong>in</strong> sesame–livestock farm<strong>in</strong>g system <strong>in</strong> <strong>Metema</strong> 45<br />

Table 26. Woody species <strong>in</strong> the sesame based farm<strong>in</strong>g system by graz<strong>in</strong>g type<br />

<strong>in</strong> sesame–livestock farm<strong>in</strong>g system (SLFS) 47<br />

Table 27. Range <strong>condition</strong> score (Mean ± SE) of communal graz<strong>in</strong>g areas<br />

by farm<strong>in</strong>g system <strong>in</strong> <strong>Metema</strong> 48<br />

Table 28. Range <strong>condition</strong> score (Mean ± SE) for road side graz<strong>in</strong>g areas found<br />

<strong>in</strong> different farm<strong>in</strong>g systems of the study district 50<br />

Table 29. Range <strong>condition</strong> score (LSM ± SE) <strong>in</strong> enclosure graz<strong>in</strong>g areas<br />

by farm<strong>in</strong>g system <strong>in</strong> <strong>Metema</strong> 51<br />

Table 30. Dry matter biomass (kg/ha) of the communal graz<strong>in</strong>g areas by farm<strong>in</strong>g<br />

system <strong>in</strong> <strong>Metema</strong> district 52<br />

Table 31. Dry matter biomass (kg/ha) of the road side graz<strong>in</strong>g areas by farm<strong>in</strong>g<br />

system <strong>in</strong> <strong>Metema</strong> 53<br />

Table 32. Dry biomass (kg/ha) of enclosure graz<strong>in</strong>g areas by farm<strong>in</strong>g system<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>Metema</strong> 54<br />

vi

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!