31.01.2015 Views

POWER UP A WINNER - Plant Services

POWER UP A WINNER - Plant Services

POWER UP A WINNER - Plant Services

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

WWW.PLANTSERVICES.COM<br />

PERFORMANCE | RELIABILIT Y | EFFICIENCY | ASSE T MANAGEMENT<br />

PERFORMANCE | RELIABILIT Y | EFFICIENCY | ASSE T MANAGEMENT<br />

<strong>POWER</strong> <strong>UP</strong> A <strong>WINNER</strong><br />

How to find the right asset management system<br />

A P R I L 2 0 0 9<br />

Power Isn’t Measured by Amps Alone<br />

p.31<br />

Properly Sealing Piping Systems<br />

p.35<br />

Green Diesel: An Oxymoron<br />

p.50<br />

Maintenance and Motivation<br />

p.19


Image is everything.<br />

Largest widescreen display<br />

45 % more viewable area<br />

2 X the display resolution<br />

See more. Work smarter.<br />

The success or failure of your work is in the details, and Fluke thermal<br />

imagers are here to answer the call better than any of our competitors.<br />

Depend on the industry’s<br />

largest and widest displays<br />

to help you analyze areas<br />

faster and find potential<br />

problems easier.<br />

See what really matters<br />

with up to 45 % more<br />

viewable area, uncluttered<br />

by permanent menus,<br />

data bars or logos.<br />

View more essential<br />

details with twice the<br />

display resolution.<br />

All because we know that when you’re on the job with a Fluke in your hand,<br />

image is everything.<br />

See for yourself.<br />

Call us today and we’ll send you a Fluke thermal imager to test drive FREE for<br />

24 hours. 1-800-760-4523 M - F, 8am - 5pm CST, or go to fluke.com/freedemo<br />

Fluke. Not just infrared. Infrared you can use. TM<br />

©2009 Fluke Corporation. Specifications are subject to change without notice. Ad 02344


COMPRESSEDAIR&GAS<br />

Ultra-Filter <br />

Superior Compressed Air Filtration<br />

• Performance validated to ISO 12500-1<br />

achieving ISO 8573-1 air quality<br />

• Pressure drop 50% less than conventional<br />

compressed air filters<br />

• Designed for the most critical low<br />

clearance installations<br />

• Safety – bayonet lock design ensures filters<br />

cannot be opened under pressure<br />

PROCESSFILTRATION<br />

for<br />

SterileAir CulinarySteam<br />

ProcessLiquids<br />

• Exceeds 3-A standard for culinary steam purity<br />

• Filtration optimized for food, beverage<br />

and other liquid applications<br />

• FDA CFR Title 21 compliant<br />

• 3-A certified<br />

• Wide range of media types and ratings<br />

• Ease of use – coalescing<br />

or particulate<br />

Call 800.543.3634<br />

Visit www.donaldson.com<br />

E-mail compressedair@donaldson.com<br />

© 2008 Donaldson Company, Inc., Minneapolis, MN U.S.A.


The New Gearmotor<br />

Gold Standard<br />

The new DODGE ® QUANTIS ® Gold gearmotor combines<br />

the Baldor•Reliance ® premium efficient Super-E ® motor<br />

with the superior QUANTIS gearbox, making the QUANTIS<br />

Gold the most energy efficient, coolest running gearmotor<br />

in the world.<br />

Available as in-line helical or right angle helical bevel<br />

c-face units, 1/2 to 10 Hp, the QUANTIS Gold raises<br />

gearmotor energy efficiency, quality and reliability to a<br />

new gold standard.<br />

• Energy Efficient<br />

• Unmatched Quality<br />

• Superior Reliability<br />

dodge-pt.com<br />

baldor.com<br />

• Quickest Delivery Available<br />

©2008 Baldor Electric Company


TABLE OF CONTENTS<br />

APRIL 2009 / VOL. 30, NO. 4<br />

FEATURES<br />

31 / COMPRESSORS<br />

Compressor Power Is Not Measured By Amps Alone<br />

Use kilowatts or characterize the motor curve to determine<br />

operating conditions<br />

35 / PIPING<br />

Keeping the Loop Closed<br />

Properly sealed piping systems are critical to efficient,<br />

sustainable plant operations<br />

38 / INSTRUMENTS AND CONTROLS<br />

Keep Process Analyzers On-Stream<br />

Despite computerization, skills are still needed to achieve<br />

the full benefits<br />

24 / COVER STORY<br />

Power Up a Winner<br />

How to find the right asset management system<br />

<strong>Plant</strong><strong>Services</strong>.com<br />

WEB EXCLUSIVE:<br />

The Role of Returnable Shipping Containers<br />

Reusable containers can increase plant and warehouse<br />

availability, and reduce plant downtime. Visit www.plant<br />

services.com/articles/2009/053.html to learn how you can<br />

implement this time- and money-saving practice in your<br />

facility.<br />

WEB EXCLUSIVE:<br />

Choosing the Correct Strainer Technology<br />

Bulk raw water users protect process and downstream<br />

equipment by selecting multi-element water strainer technology.<br />

Find out the details about how they did it and how<br />

it works at www.plantservices.com/articles/2009/054.html.<br />

WHITE PAPER:<br />

Manufacturer Reduces Thread Failures<br />

With Anti-Seize Paste<br />

An equipment manufacturer searches for a high-performance<br />

lubricant that can withstand extremely high torque<br />

in stainless steel threaded connections to prevent cold<br />

welding or galling of the sealing surfaces and reduce an<br />

unacceptable failure rate. See how they did it at<br />

www.plantservices.com/wp_downloads/PS090326_<br />

Molykote.html<br />

SPECIALISTS<br />

19 / HUMAN CAPITAL<br />

Maintenance v. Motivation<br />

Who’s Herzberg and why<br />

should I care<br />

21 / ASSET MANAGER<br />

New Roles for<br />

CMMS Vendors<br />

Expect more than a shrinkwrapped<br />

box of software<br />

23 / TECHNOLOGY TOOLBOX<br />

Alternative Materials<br />

High-tech options have steel,<br />

brass, copper and other metals<br />

on the run<br />

COLUMNS AND DEPARTMENTS<br />

7 / FROM THE EDITOR<br />

Who Will Pay<br />

How to win the carbon game<br />

9 / LETTERS<br />

• Has Alternative Reality<br />

• Detained By Security<br />

11 / THE PS.COM FILES<br />

New on <strong>Plant</strong><strong>Services</strong>.com<br />

We are transforming this<br />

column to focus on the<br />

in-depth resources of<br />

<strong>Plant</strong><strong>Services</strong>.com.<br />

12 / <strong>UP</strong> AND RUNNING<br />

Automation and Power<br />

Joined in Orlando<br />

42 / WEB HUNTER<br />

Barter If You<br />

Don’t Have Cash<br />

A time-honored way to get<br />

what you need despite<br />

budget cuts<br />

50 / ENERGY EXPERT<br />

Green Diesel –<br />

An Oxymoron<br />

Biodiesel and ethanol<br />

don’t belong in the<br />

same breath<br />

15 / CRISIS CORNER<br />

Get Out of This Hole<br />

Now is the time to take<br />

action that will help during<br />

the economic upturn<br />

16 / WHAT WORKS<br />

44 / IN THE TRENCHES<br />

Insured to the Hilt<br />

Acme attempts to save money<br />

by modifying its pension plan<br />

47 / PRODUCT FOCUS<br />

48 / MRO MARKETPLACE /<br />

AD INDEX<br />

49 / CLASSIFIEDS<br />

WWW.PLANTSERVICES.COM APRIL 2009 5


®<br />

Lubriplate.com<br />

Technology You Can Trust<br />

From The Team You Can Trust.<br />

With 139 years of lubrication experience, you can trust the<br />

Lubriplate Team to deliver the quality lubricants you need<br />

to protect your machinery. In addition, the Lubriplate Team<br />

offers a full array of complimentary services not offered<br />

by other lubricant manufacturers, providing you with<br />

a wide range of benefits.<br />

- Advanced Synthetic Lubricants that last longer and<br />

perform better over extended lubrication intervals.<br />

- Lubricant Consolidation through the use of<br />

multi-functional lubricants.<br />

- Complimentary <strong>Services</strong> that include; plant surveys,<br />

lube maintenance software, color coded machinery<br />

tags, follow-up lubrication analysis and extensive<br />

lubrication training programs.<br />

Call today and see how the Lubriplate Team can help<br />

you meet your sustainability and performance goals.<br />

139 Years of Trust in Every Lubricant.<br />

Lubriplate Lubricants Company<br />

Newark, NJ 07105 / Toledo, OH 43605 / 1-800-733-4755<br />

www.lubriplate.com / LubeXpert@lubriplate.com


from the editor<br />

paul studebaker, cmrp<br />

Who Will Pay<br />

How to win the carbon game<br />

Ongoing climate-change treaty negotiations in preparation<br />

for the November 2009 United Nations Climate Conference<br />

have focused a lot of attention on the costs of carbon<br />

emissions. President Obama has pledged to put the United<br />

States on a path to cut emissions to 1990 levels by 2020 (with<br />

an additional 80% reduction by 2050).<br />

The current Kyoto Protocol covers only about 30% of<br />

global emissions, mainly because the United States and<br />

China didn’t ratify it, and the rest of the world is unlikely to<br />

go forward without us. So, the world’s leading greenhouse<br />

gas emitters are grappling to determine which country will<br />

lose more ground as a consequence of cleaning up our acts.<br />

U.S. Energy Secretary David Chu recently suggested that the<br />

United States might use tariffs against trading partners who<br />

don’t reduce greenhouse gas emissions. “If other countries don’t<br />

impose a cost on carbon, then we would be at a disadvantage,”<br />

Chu told the House Science and Technology Committee. Import<br />

duties could be used to offset that competitive advantage.<br />

The next day, China climate change negotiator Xie Zhenhua<br />

responded, “I oppose using climate change as an excuse to<br />

practice protectionism on trade.” A dust-up ensued over who<br />

should shoulder the cost of cutting emissions for goods produced<br />

overseas. If a product manufactured in China is sold in<br />

the United States, who’s responsible for its carbon footprint<br />

Li Gao, director of China’s Department of Climate Change,<br />

says countries that buy Chinese goods should be held responsible<br />

for the carbon dioxide emitted during manufacturing.<br />

“About 15% to 25% of China’s emissions come from the<br />

products which we make for the world, which should not be<br />

taken by us,” Gao said at a forum sponsored by the Pew Center<br />

on Global Climate Change. “This share of emission should be<br />

taken by the consumers, not the producers.”<br />

Principles are important, but what’s a ton of CO 2<br />

actually<br />

worth on the global market Numbers commonly bandied<br />

about range from about $10 per ton to $40 per ton, equivalent<br />

to about 10 cents to 40 cents for the 20-odd pounds<br />

generated by combusting a gallon of a fuel like gasoline. This<br />

cost isn’t trivial, but it’s not large compared to the variations<br />

in the cost of the fuel itself during the past year (from about<br />

$2 per gallon to $4 per gallon) brought on by vagaries of<br />

supply, demand and speculation.<br />

People tend to focus on the cost of carbon credits, how<br />

they’ll affect prices of fuel and electricity, who will have to<br />

pay, and whether the government will get the money. But for<br />

a broad range of carbon-emission-reducing activities, the<br />

price is negative – more than offset by lower energy costs. In<br />

effect, a market in greenhouse gas emissions credits offers<br />

smart people a lot of opportunity to improve their competitive<br />

positions and bottom lines.<br />

McKinsey and Co. analyzed more than 250 sources of<br />

U.S. carbon dioxide emissions and the per-ton costs to<br />

For a broad range of carbonemission-reducing<br />

activities,<br />

the price is negative – more than<br />

offset by lOWer energy costs.<br />

reduce them. (See the full report at www.mckinsey.com/<br />

clientservice/ccsi/pdf/Greenhouse_Gas_Emissions_Execu<br />

tive_Summary.pdf.) They found that the United States could<br />

reduce greenhouse gas emissions by about 3 gigatons CO 2<br />

equivalent by 2030, using tested approaches and high-potential<br />

emerging technologies, at marginal costs of less than<br />

$50 per ton. The total outlay between now and 2030 would<br />

average $50 billion a year, a total of about $1 trillion.<br />

That’s chump change at AIG, but more interesting are<br />

McKinsey’s calculations of measures that offer sizeable paybacks<br />

for CO 2<br />

-equivalent reductions. These include:<br />

• Higher-efficiency commercial and residential electronics:<br />

$90 per ton<br />

• Residential and commercial lighting: $80 to $90 per ton<br />

• Combined heat and power: $15 to $40 per ton<br />

• Industrial process improvements: $15 per ton<br />

Bear in mind, these measures pay back whether or not a<br />

value is attached to those tons of greenhouse gases. Any significant<br />

U.S. market for carbon credits will add the prevailing<br />

per-ton price to those returns.<br />

While Chu, Zhenhua and Gao brandish words about who<br />

should get stuck with the bill for greenhouse gas emissions,<br />

the smart money is lining up behind the people who understand<br />

how avoid them in the first place.<br />

Paul STUDEBAKer, CMRP, Editor In Chief<br />

pstudebaker@putman.net, (630) 467-1300 ext. 433<br />

www.PLANTSERVICES.com APRIL 2009 7


M A I N T E N A N C E P R O F E S S I O N A L S<br />

CAN’T WAIT<br />

THAT’S WHY INPRO/SEAL OFFERS SAME DAY, NOT SOME<br />

DAY, SHIPMENTS AT NO ADDITIONAL CHARGE.<br />

Total dedication to the design and manufacture of bearing isolators<br />

makes it possible for us to quickly respond to customer needs like no<br />

one else in the business.<br />

When you have equipment down and in need of an up-grade to<br />

permanent bearing protection, you can’t afford to wait around<br />

for days or weeks for delivery. You need bearing isolators<br />

now. We’ll have them shipped the same day you order.<br />

Inpro/Seal Bearing Isolators for common rotating<br />

equipment will be shipped to you within a few hours. Split<br />

isolators or specialty designs will be shipped to you<br />

in a couple of days, not weeks or months.<br />

When you’re serious about replacing<br />

temporary contact bearing seals with<br />

Inpro/Seal’s permanent bearing<br />

protection, and you don’t have<br />

time to play the waiting game,<br />

call 800-447-0525 or visit<br />

www.inpro-seal.com.<br />

Best Products + Great Service<br />

= Happy Customers


PS0901_01_Cover.indd 1<br />

WWW.PLANTSERVICES.COM<br />

p.33<br />

p.21<br />

p.41<br />

1/13/09 11:30:38 AM<br />

Putman media, inc.<br />

555 W. Pierce Rd., Ste. 301,<br />

Itasca, IL 60143<br />

Phone: (630) 467-1300,<br />

Fax: (630) 467-1120<br />

mike brenner,<br />

Group Publisher<br />

mbrenner@putman.net<br />

ediTOriAL sTAff<br />

paul studeBAKer, cmrp<br />

Editor in Chief<br />

pstudebaker@putman.net<br />

russeLL l. krATOWicz, p.e. CMrp<br />

Executive Editor<br />

russk@putman.net<br />

lisa towers<br />

Managing Digital Editor<br />

ltowers@putman.net<br />

stePHen c. herner<br />

Group Art Director<br />

sherner@putman.net<br />

jennifer dakas<br />

Art Director<br />

jdakas@putman.net<br />

DAvid berger, p.eng.<br />

Contributing Editor<br />

peter garforTH<br />

Contributing Editor<br />

sheiLA kennedy<br />

Contributing Editor<br />

joel leonard<br />

Contributing Editor<br />

BOB sperber<br />

Editor at Large<br />

puBLiCATion services<br />

carmeLA kappel<br />

Assistant to the Publisher<br />

ckappel@putman.net<br />

jerry clark<br />

V.P., Circulation<br />

jclark@putman.net<br />

jACK jones<br />

Circulation Director<br />

jjones@putman.net<br />

riTA fitzgerALD<br />

Production Manager<br />

rfitzgerald@putman.net<br />

CLAudia stachowiAK<br />

Reprints Marketing Manager<br />

Foster Reprints<br />

(866) 879-9144 ext. 121<br />

claudia@fostereprints.com<br />

administrATive sTAff<br />

jOHn m. cappeLLeTTi<br />

President/CEO<br />

julie cappeLLeTTi-LAnge<br />

Vice President<br />

keiTH larson<br />

V.P., Content<br />

rose souTHArd<br />

IT Director<br />

Has ALTernative ReALity<br />

BACKTALK<br />

In response to your article (“Invest in Reality,” January, p. 7, www.plantservices.com/<br />

articles/2009/003.html), where do I start<br />

“Never invest in something you don’t understand” is a good idea. Maybe<br />

you can help me understand how mortgaging our children’s future to the tune<br />

of more than $1 trillion is going to be good for them. The<br />

Congressional Budget Office estimates the stimulus package<br />

will cost every man, woman and child in the United<br />

States $298,000 each when the whole bill is paid.<br />

Of course, the package contains hundreds of billions in<br />

tax cuts and infrastructure projects that are basically good<br />

ideas. But what is the value of the “new” infrastructure if<br />

INSIDE,<br />

there are no businesses producing goods that need to be<br />

Contracting strategies<br />

for a new economy<br />

shipped across country The capital gains tax has a stranglehold<br />

on business in this country and is a major reason most<br />

manufacturing jobs have headed out of country. Repairing<br />

classrooms and fixing leaking pipes isn’t the way to stimulate<br />

a sluggish economy. Across-the-board tax cuts to all segments of society and<br />

cutting the capital gains tax in half, if not eliminating it for the next five years, are.<br />

There is bipartisan support for a smart infrastructure investment as<br />

you stated, and there is a widespread willingness to pay for smart investments<br />

that create wealth (not a dirty word) and well-paying jobs,<br />

but there is only partisan support for a giant spending bill.<br />

“Invest in Reality … ” The reality is, this is not a good investment.<br />

Doug Penning, vibration analyst<br />

Georgia Pacific Corp. Wauna Mill Clatskanie, Ore.<br />

DeTAined by Security<br />

I enjoyed a recent issue of <strong>Plant</strong> <strong>Services</strong> and agree with your views on the importance<br />

of keeping maintenance up at all times. As a vendor representative, I am<br />

struggling to convince our customers of the cost-effectiveness of remote diagnostics<br />

of our systems over the Web. The customer engineers who are responsible for operation<br />

generally agree, though the customer IT is usually the barrier that is nearly<br />

impossible to overcome because of the cybersecurity concerns that are both valid<br />

and increasingly popular in publications.<br />

Remote diagnostics promises huge traveling cost-savings, but customers have no<br />

option but to request our field service visits even for issues that could be effectively<br />

resolved remotely given Web access to our computers in the customer plant.<br />

I would be interested in your opinion on the issue.<br />

Iouri Pereltsvaig, director of customer support<br />

Compressor Controls Corp., Des Moines, Iowa<br />

Asset management expert David Berger, P.Eng, replies: I agree that remote diagnostics is a<br />

superb technology that saves considerable time and money. However, it will take time for<br />

the security fears to subside. This is what happened 20 years ago, when it became possible<br />

for a vendor to access someone’s server or mainframe remotely, and later, when software<br />

became available, to take over control of a remote PC. The pattern is the same – when the<br />

technology emerges, it’s raved about, becomes popular, security is breached, the security<br />

fears flourish and sales drop for vendors. Then, safeguards are put in place, the media calm<br />

the masses, some other issue steals the headlines, and vendors are back in business.<br />

J A N U A R Y 2 0 0 9<br />

PERFORMANCE | RELIABILIT Y | EFFICIENCY | ASSE T MANAGEMENT<br />

PERFORMANCE | RELIABILIT Y | EFFICIENCY | ASSE T MANAGEMENT<br />

PERFORMANCE | RELIABILIT Y | EFFICIENCY | ASSE T MANAGEMENT<br />

www.PLANTSERVICES.com APRIL 2009 9<br />

Compressors: When Rules<br />

of Thumb Are Dumb<br />

New Expert on<br />

Human Capital<br />

Buying and Selling<br />

Preowned-Equipment


New<br />

on<br />

Welcome to the new, interactive version<br />

of the PS.com Files. We are transforming this<br />

column to focus on the in-depth resources<br />

that the staff of <strong>Plant</strong> <strong>Services</strong> offers on our<br />

Web site, www.<strong>Plant</strong><strong>Services</strong>.com and our<br />

companion site, www.SkillTV.net. In addition<br />

to the “More Resources” boxes that appear<br />

at the end of many articles in this magazine,<br />

you will be able to refer to this column for the<br />

most intriguing additions we have made to the<br />

Web site each month. New content is added to<br />

<strong>Plant</strong><strong>Services</strong>.com daily, so be sure to bookmark<br />

the site and check back often!<br />

ARE YOU ON TWITTER YET<br />

If you’re not a member of Twitter nation<br />

yet, you might want to take a look around<br />

www.twitter.com to see if it’s a tool that<br />

you might find to be useful. While you’re<br />

there, go to http://twitter.com/help/how<br />

to watch a short video explanation about<br />

how the site works. Once you get the hang<br />

of it and create your own account, follow<br />

us at twitter.com/plantservices and<br />

twitter.com/skilltv. You’ll always be up<br />

to date on what’s happening on our Web<br />

sites, and we’ll get the bonus of being<br />

able to follow your updates as well!<br />

Have questions or<br />

suggestions about content<br />

you would like to see on<br />

<strong>Plant</strong><strong>Services</strong>.com or<br />

SkillTV.net<br />

Send an e-mail to Lisa Towers,<br />

managing editor of digital<br />

media, at ltowers@putman.net.<br />

COOL ARTICLE OF THE MONTH<br />

Read all about “Electricity and circulating<br />

fluidized bed power technology”<br />

at www.plantservices.com/<br />

articles/2009/056.html to find out<br />

how circulating fluidized bed technology<br />

is a part of the solution to<br />

meeting the world’s energy needs<br />

while conserving natural resources<br />

and preserving our environment.<br />

MAINTENANCE EVANGELIST<br />

VISITS YOUTHBUILD<br />

In a collection of videos he taped<br />

while visiting the YouthBuild USA<br />

program in suburban Chicago, Maintenance<br />

Evangelist Joel Leonard talks<br />

to students about how the program<br />

has helped them get training that<br />

allows them to work in the building<br />

trades. Meet students like Eric Gallegos,<br />

who now has career opportunities in HVAC thanks to the training<br />

he received. Access this six-video series at www.skilltv.com and<br />

click on the YouthBuild tab at the top right of the video player.<br />

FREE E-NEWSLETTERS<br />

Sign up to receive free newsletters<br />

at www.plantservices.com/news<br />

letters and you’ll get the newest<br />

content in asset management,<br />

energy efficiency and updates on<br />

solving the skilled labor shortage<br />

sent right to your inbox. Don’t miss<br />

out on our newest monthly e-newsletter,<br />

Skill TV Solutions, and all of<br />

the helpful resources that Maintenance<br />

Evangelist Joel Leonard will<br />

be bringing to your attention each<br />

month. Look for the next edition<br />

of this newsletter on April 28.<br />

WWW.PLANTSERVICES.COM APRIL 2009 11


up & Running<br />

Automation and Power Joined in oRlando<br />

ABB event acknowledges economy, focuses on efficiency<br />

Despite economic uncertainties and tight travel budgets,<br />

more than 3,300 ABB representatives, partners and users met<br />

March 23-25 in Orlando, Fla., to share practices, identify trends<br />

and check out 72,000 sq. ft. of exhibits designed to help them<br />

make the most of automation and power systems.<br />

The consensus is that the current economic climate is only a<br />

temporary impediment and distraction from pursuing the rich<br />

potentials in optimizing production, increasing reliability and<br />

improving energy efficiency that can come from integrating<br />

process and electric power monitoring and control.<br />

Among the more than 500 presentations was “Electrical<br />

Integration: A Strategy for Achieving Unified Operations<br />

resources<br />

Calculate cost of condition monitoring<br />

Azima DLI’s WATCHMAN in-house condition-monitoring<br />

program cost calculator allows plant and maintenance<br />

managers to calculate the annualized cost of current<br />

machine condition-monitoring programs to help determine<br />

the right mix of on-site and outsourced solutions. Complete<br />

a brief questionnaire to get a detailed assessment.<br />

www.plantservices.com/industrynews/2009/061.html<br />

See real-world results of energy audits<br />

In 2006, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) launched<br />

energy-saving assessments at six industrial plants. As of<br />

March 2009, it has completed 2,053 assessments, and<br />

1,873 of the plants have identified energy cost savings totaling<br />

more than $1.2 billion, implemented savings totaling<br />

more than $190 million, and documented potential carbon<br />

dioxide emissions reductions of 10.3 million metric tons.<br />

www.plantservices.com/industrynews/2009/057.html.<br />

Dig into performance-BAsed outsouRCing<br />

The University of Tennessee (UT) offers instruction on<br />

getting the most from service providers using performance-based<br />

outsourcing (PBO), starting with the article<br />

at the link below. “Companies wanting to improve their<br />

relationships should have a sound guidebook,” say authors<br />

Kate Vitasek and Mike Ledyard, so you’ll also find<br />

links to a free book and UT classes on the subject.<br />

www.plantservices.com/articles/2009/046.html<br />

and Extended Asset Management,” by Stefan Bollmeyer,<br />

ABB fieldbus product manager for its System 800xA.<br />

“Electrical integration is the next frontier in driving productivity,<br />

increasing safety and reducing costs,” Bollmeyer said.<br />

“It enables users to achieve total plant visualization so they<br />

can make decisions based on dollars and cents, and not just<br />

on temperatures and voltages,” Bollmeyer said. “This also<br />

means they maximize production by reducing the impact of<br />

an unreliable power supply, as well as reduce energy costs by<br />

conducting peak shaving.”<br />

“Electrical integration also allows users to reduce operational<br />

costs by unifying their operations environment, performing<br />

condition-driven maintenance, reducing spares and training,<br />

and establishing cross-discipline cooperation. They further can<br />

reduce investment costs by minimizing cabling and engineering,<br />

by implementing an optimized network design and by<br />

establishing asset management for their electrical subsystems.”<br />

Despite these potential gains, Bollmeyer added that several<br />

persistent barriers continue to block electrical integration.<br />

“In the past, electrical integration was hampered by a<br />

lack of communication standards and architectural design,<br />

high project execution and commissioning costs, and high<br />

life cycle costs,” he said. “Organizational barriers among<br />

departments within plants and suppliers also have hindered<br />

integration, and these mind-set-based barriers often are<br />

harder to deal with than the technical challenges to integration.<br />

Many users have their own department and kingdoms,<br />

and they want them to stay just as they are.”<br />

To help process control and power staffs cooperate on<br />

achieving better electrical integration, ABB recommends<br />

they adopt a unified integration method based on a single<br />

system environment, use a fieldbus network to handle electrification<br />

control and management, and use the IEC 61850<br />

standard to tie together process instrumentation, process<br />

electrification and power distribution networks.<br />

For example, he reported that using IEC 61850 to integrate<br />

MV motor controls gives users several benefits, including<br />

fewer cables, easier installation, higher performance,<br />

alarm and events from devices, and improved diagnostics.<br />

In his presentation on the company’s future direction, Peter<br />

Terwiesch, ABB chief technology officer, outlined how ABB<br />

will continue to help industry save energy and improve productivity.<br />

“Across all industries, 80% of energy is lost between<br />

generation and use. It’s a leaky pipe, as it were,” Terwiesch said.<br />

12 APRIL 2009 www.PLANTSERVICES.com


Traditional Baghouse<br />

Torit PowerCore<br />

50-70% smaller<br />

SMALLER.<br />

SMARTER.<br />

BaGHOUse BreaKTHrOUGH<br />

Think all baghouse dust collectors and filters<br />

are the same Not anymore.<br />

Torit ® PowerCore ® dust collectors with<br />

PowerCore ® filter packs are the first major<br />

baghouse enhancement in decades. Wellproven<br />

in engine filtration and backed by 100<br />

pending and issued patents, smarter Torit<br />

PowerCore technology is now at your fingertips.<br />

Only from Donaldson Torit, these smaller<br />

sized collectors save floor space, allow<br />

point-of-use collection, require less steel,<br />

reduce transportation costs, demand less<br />

maintenance and deliver better filtration.<br />

Just one 7-in. PowerCore filter pack replaces<br />

six 8-ft. filter bags. smaller is smarter.<br />

PowerCore is a Donaldson Filtration Technology.<br />

©2008 Donaldson Company, Inc. Minneapolis, MN USA<br />

800-365-1331<br />

Donaldson.com/ToritPowerCore<br />

Donaldsontorit.com


<strong>UP</strong> & RUNNING<br />

ABB technology can reduce losses by 20% to 30%.<br />

“We aren’t seeing customers that are too interested in<br />

building new plants right now, so our objective must be<br />

to extend asset life,” Terwiesch said. “We must help our<br />

customers optimize energy use and help them overcome<br />

workforce shortages now and in the future. We must focus<br />

on integration, new functionality, more flexible infrastructure<br />

and open standards.”<br />

For example, Terwiesch cited Statoil Hydro Grane,<br />

which has reduced engineering labor hours by 20% to 30%.<br />

“They’ve reduced supply-chain labor hours by 50%. Change<br />

orders have been reduced by 90% to 95%, with capital<br />

expenditure savings of greater than 20%, and operations expenditure<br />

savings of approximately 20% as well,” Terwiesch<br />

added. “We expect to see the same savings as a result of our<br />

new five-year agreement with Petrobras.”<br />

Terwiesch described how ABB remote access can help<br />

customers by providing 24/7 access to subject matter experts<br />

who might no longer be available at the plant level because<br />

of workforce reductions and retirements. “This remote<br />

access and connectivity can lead to integrated operations between<br />

production, operations and maintenance and can save<br />

customers substantially,” he said.<br />

To help usher in this new era, Jim Kline, global business and<br />

product manager for ABB’s Collaborative Production Management<br />

division, presented “The Next Generation of Managing<br />

Information.” Kline summarized trends in information<br />

management and showed how ABB’s collaborative production<br />

management software can help users move data between the<br />

production and business levels. He defined CPM as “a method<br />

to unify disparate systems to achieve operational excellence.”<br />

“It still all comes down to money, but today it’s no longer<br />

enough simply to execute a production plan,” Kline said.<br />

“Economics and energy are now even more key factors<br />

across every enterprise, and so they must be constantly<br />

monitored, even in the control room. This means everyone<br />

is involved, and so they need the right data, all the time and<br />

in every location. This level of collaboration and cross-functional<br />

capabilities is vital to success, but it also means users<br />

need their data in minutes instead of hours.”<br />

We Rent Solutions<br />

Cooling Heating Dehumidification<br />

Rental Experts<br />

We keep manufacturing plants running at peak capacity.<br />

Don’t let temperature or humidity control problems degrade production<br />

rates or quality. Our engineers speak your technical language.<br />

Chillers Cooling Towers<br />

Pumps Heat Exchangers<br />

Air Conditioners Spot Coolers<br />

Air Handlers Dehumidifiers<br />

Heaters Boilers Generators<br />

800-586-8336<br />

CarrierRentals.com<br />

We are the rental cooling, heating<br />

and dehumidification experts.<br />

14 APRIL 2009 WWW.PLANTSERVICES.COM


Crisis COrner<br />

Contributing editor<br />

Let’s Get Out of This hOLe<br />

It’s time to prepare for the economy to turn around<br />

Never before have we had an economic downturn<br />

dominated by a 24-hour news cycle. As soon as we see a little<br />

upward movement, somebody throws out another depressing<br />

statistic, trumped-up scandal or sensational tidbit apparently<br />

designed to catch attention and sow fresh fears.<br />

Now pundits are pushing the idea of a depression as the<br />

economy continues spiraling down. What a difference a few<br />

years can make. As little as a year ago, the general mood was,<br />

“Hey, we are the U.S.A., let’s party and spend money on the<br />

latest thing, regardless of need, with or without the cash to pay<br />

for it.” My late father once grabbed my arm from his hospital<br />

bed in the cancer ward and said with tears in his eyes, “Son, the<br />

country will be going through a depression soon and you’ve got<br />

to be ready.” At the time it seemed like an impossibility.<br />

A few years later, major banks, businesses and industries<br />

are on the brink of bankruptcy, mortgage foreclosures are at<br />

all-time highs and crowds of unemployed gather at every job<br />

fair. Yes, all of America now knows that the party is over.<br />

But this economic downturn is showing silver linings that<br />

might mitigate the maintenance crisis. For example, we won’t<br />

see the projected rapid exodus of skilled boomer-aged workers<br />

because would-be retirees now must put in more years to<br />

rebuild their retirement savings. Also, the general public is no<br />

longer so snooty about jobs in the technical and skilled trades.<br />

The federal government is taking the lead by backing numerous<br />

initiatives to attack the enormous deferred maintenance<br />

backlog of our nation’s infrastructure. Companies that have<br />

chosen to avoid performing maintenance are facing more<br />

public scrutiny in the aftermath of the now infamous roof leaks<br />

at Georgia Peanut Corp. that contributed to the deaths of more<br />

than 30 people and generated Congressional hearings.<br />

Now, we have to find a way to reverse the spiral and get out<br />

of this economic hole. Common sense says that training, new<br />

technologies and efficiency programs are part of the pathway<br />

to prosperity. However, we also must deal with the training<br />

paradox: When times are good, companies have the money, but<br />

don’t have time to send people to training sessions. When the<br />

economy is bad, they have the time but no funds to spare.<br />

Replenished with $4.5 billion, the Workforce Investment<br />

Act of 1998 allows locations around the country to gear up<br />

quickly to implement a variety of training projects. These<br />

range from training displaced workers for growth sectors to<br />

youth-development programs, as well as some incumbentworker<br />

training.<br />

This eCONOmic downturn is showiNG<br />

silver liniNGs that might mitigate<br />

the maintenaNCe crisis.<br />

The Department of Commerce has a Workforce Development<br />

executive director to manage the One-Stop or JobLink<br />

centers in each state. Each state is divided into workforce<br />

regions and has a Workforce Advisory Board and executive<br />

director to identify areas of need and to implement solutions<br />

to resolve these challenges. In April and June 2009, Workforce<br />

Investment Funding will be hitting state treasuries to<br />

be dispatched to the regions with approved plans. Numerous<br />

projects around the country will begin this summer and fall.<br />

Those interested in upgrading workforce performance<br />

and garnering professional assistance can take action. Meet<br />

the key people who can help you. Your local, county, region<br />

and state economic development teams are busy working to<br />

establish an environment to grow and maintain the business<br />

community. They are sensitive to incumbent workforce<br />

training and can connect you to new initiatives that retain<br />

and grow workforce skill levels.<br />

Reach out to the continuing education wing of your local<br />

universities, community colleges and private technical<br />

schools. Connect with your state, region and local workforce<br />

development boards to forge a strong relationship with the<br />

executive director. Shared problems can lead to shared solutions.<br />

As you get to know these public officials, provide them<br />

with facility tours and let them see your company’s opportunities<br />

and challenges.<br />

Those who have a plan are rewarded. Perform a workforce<br />

needs analysis to determine your current and future requirements.<br />

Then, construct a workforce development plan with a<br />

strategy geared for retention, recruitment and training.<br />

Companies that get connected, share their challenges and<br />

develop strategies will be the ones that receive maximum internal<br />

and external assistance. They will be ready to emerge<br />

from this downturn with renewed focus and vigor to handle<br />

future growth as economic skies clear.<br />

E-mail Contributing Editor Joel Leonard at joel@skilltv.net.<br />

www.PLANTSERVICES.com APRIL 2009 15


what works<br />

Crack Troubleshot Over Web<br />

Million-horsepower steam turbine problem solved by remote stress analysis<br />

A power plant in Asia was experiencing high vibration and<br />

cracking in the exhaust hood of a critical large low-pressure<br />

steam turbine (Figure 1). The typical troubleshooting approach<br />

Mechanical Solutions Inc. (MSI, www.mechsol.com)<br />

uses in such situations is to travel to the site of the machinery,<br />

collect the data, analyze it and recommend a fix. However, in<br />

this case, such a trip might have jeopardized company personnel<br />

in an area where insurgents and bird flu were threatening,<br />

so a remote problem-solving approach was implemented.<br />

Figure 1. Exhaust hood cracking produced a reliability and safety<br />

concern.<br />

Figure 2. Remote test data were applied to a CAD model (left)<br />

and diagnosed by finite element analysis (FEA, right).<br />

Data acquisition hardware and a large amount of instrumentation<br />

was prepped and shipped to the jobsite, with<br />

proper export licensing and paperwork filed consistent with<br />

U.S. State Department and ITAR controls. The equipment<br />

included a large number of accelerometers, pressure transducers,<br />

strain gages and a modally tuned impact hammer.<br />

An Internet Protocol (IP) telephone and camera also were<br />

included to facilitate inexpensive verbal and visual real-time<br />

communication between the expert engineers in the United<br />

States and the plant personnel in Asia. The plant’s local<br />

personnel installed the instrumentation under MSI’s careful<br />

oversight from 12,000 miles away.<br />

MSI’s troubleshooting process was carried out step by<br />

step, with the local plant personnel acting as MSI’s hands<br />

and legs at the site. Visual and voice communication<br />

were continuous to avoid misunderstandings despite the<br />

distance and language difference. MSI staff controlled a<br />

40-channel FFT analyzer and a 16-channel strain gage<br />

amplifier and recorder remotely over the broadband<br />

Internet connection, available through a high-speed satellite<br />

intermediary.<br />

Remotely collected data were immediately compared<br />

with theoretical results provided by finite element analysis<br />

(FEA) performed at MSI’s U.S. offices (Figure 2). Assumptions<br />

about boundary conditions, flange-to-flange<br />

stiffness and dynamic loads were confirmed or adjusted<br />

until the theoretical predictions matched the actual behavior.<br />

The resulting analysis was calibrated with reality<br />

in this manner, and then was used with confidence to<br />

evaluate potential fixes.<br />

The remote test data on the exterior of the machine, and on<br />

the shaft within the bearing housings, were extrapolated from<br />

the locations where data acquisition was feasible, to zones inside<br />

the machine where it was impractical to locate data probes.<br />

This is a form of noncontact stress-measurement system<br />

(NSMS) that MSI pioneered in government research projects<br />

during recent years. The approach determined behavior of the<br />

complete (not just the exposed) turbine rotor, and revealed how<br />

rotor motion coordinated with structural motion.<br />

The combined test and analysis model identified a dangerous,<br />

running-speed resonance of a natural frequency of the<br />

exhaust hood that involved synchronous motion at both<br />

16 APRIL 2009 www.PLANTSERVICES.com


ends close to the turbine operating speed. It furthermore<br />

proved that the structural natural frequency coupled with<br />

an S-shaped rotor natural frequency that was supposed to be<br />

comfortably above running speed, but instead was resonant,<br />

causing a feedback relationship that led to enough motion to<br />

crack the casing at the problem locations.<br />

Figure 3 shows the motion of the natural frequency combination.<br />

A mistake in the alignment between the turbine<br />

and generator, which would have normally resulted in minor<br />

vibration increase, was driving the rotor mode, which, in<br />

turn, was driving the bearing housing, which drove the<br />

exhaust hood casing motion. The swaying structural motion<br />

reinforced the rotor second bending (S-shaped) mode shape,<br />

completing the dangerous cycle.<br />

The ends of the exhaust hood were stiffened with thick,<br />

bolt-on support ribs, and thick metal plating across the<br />

casing ends. The vibration was dramatically reduced, and<br />

the cracking stopped for the first time in several years.<br />

Costly trial-and-error problem-solving was avoided by the<br />

Figure 3. Operating deflection shape (ODS) and modal test data<br />

show motions of the exhaust hood (green), bearing housing<br />

(blue) and shaft (red).<br />

rapid-response and low-cost approach, allowing the plant<br />

to get back to what it does best: producing megawatts for an<br />

electric-power-hungry region of the world.<br />

Create a<br />

Job Seeker<br />

Account<br />

PS0903_printjobboard_12h.indd 1<br />

• Post an anonymous<br />

resume<br />

• View jobs<br />

• Set up personal job alerts<br />

Control Connection<br />

THE CAREER RESOURCE FOR PROCESS AUTOMATION PROFESSIONALS<br />

Control Connection<br />

Visit <strong>Plant</strong><strong>Services</strong>.com to get<br />

started today.<br />

THE CAREER RESOURCE FOR MACHINE AUTOMATION PROFESSIONALS<br />

ChemConnection<br />

THE CAREER RESOURCE FOR CHEMICAL PROCESSING PROFESSIONALS<br />

<strong>Plant</strong> Connection<br />

THE CAREER RESOURCE FOR PLANT ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS<br />

Pharma Connection<br />

3/6/09 12:21 PM<br />

THE CAREER RESOURCE FOR www.PLANTSERVICES.com PHARMACEUTICAL PROFESSIONALS APRIL 2009 17


HUMan CAPitaL<br />

Tom Moriarty, P.E., CmrP<br />

Maintenance vs. motivation<br />

Who’s Herzberg and why should I care<br />

Frederick Herzberg was a highly respected social psychologist<br />

who developed a theory of employee motivation.<br />

He asked a group of workers to think about times when they<br />

had particularly good feelings about their jobs, and times<br />

when they felt particularly bad about their jobs. Herzberg<br />

also asked them to describe the feelings they had at those<br />

times. What he found was that workers associate distinct<br />

types of conditions as either good or bad situations. His<br />

research separated the factors that influence how people feel<br />

about their work into two categories: maintenance factors<br />

and motivational factors.<br />

Maintenance factors are necessary to maintain a reasonable<br />

level of job satisfaction. Maintenance factors include:<br />

• Policies and administration – the adequacy or inadequacy<br />

of a company’s organization and management<br />

• Supervision – its competency, fairness and ability<br />

• Interpersonal relationships – the bond between people<br />

and their peers, subordinates and supervisors<br />

• Working conditions – the physical environment where<br />

work is performed<br />

• Salary – the employee’s total compensation package<br />

• Personal life – the effect the job has on personal concerns,<br />

including family, recreation, etc.<br />

• Status – the attainment of perks relative to the person’s<br />

position, including parking spots, better computer, etc.<br />

• Job security – the work environment safety and stability<br />

He found that people talk about maintenance factors<br />

when they cite bad feelings about their jobs. The presence of<br />

maintenance factors won’t motivate people to achieve higher<br />

performance, but some minimum level of each maintenance<br />

factor is required to prevent dissatisfaction with the work<br />

environment. Too much dissatisfaction can lead to a longterm<br />

problem and a roadblock to motivation. Some longterm<br />

problems likely to surface include retaining employees,<br />

requests for transfer out of the department, absenteeism, etc.<br />

Motivational factors increase the likelihood that people<br />

will perform better, with less supervision. When people have<br />

good feelings about their jobs, they usually were talking<br />

about motivational factors. Motivational factors include:<br />

• Achievement – personal satisfaction in completing a job<br />

• Recognition – feedback about job accomplishment<br />

• Work – the actual content or the individual’s perceived<br />

value of the work<br />

• Responsibility – control over one’s job, or being in<br />

charge of a team<br />

• Advancement – an upward change in job status<br />

• Growth – learning and trying new skills or experiences<br />

On a daily basis, a supervisor has much more control over<br />

In the day-to-day grind, we often<br />

don’t think enough about enriching<br />

job satisfaction.<br />

motivational factors than maintenance factors. A supervisor<br />

can arrange to give workers a sense of achievement and positive<br />

recognition for good work. A supervisor can empower<br />

team members with greater responsibilities and provide<br />

opportunities for professional growth.<br />

Keep maintenance factors as stable as possible to prevent<br />

dissatisfaction, and load the work environment with motivational<br />

factors. Think of the work environment as a ship. The<br />

ship has to float on the water; a watertight hull is the nautical<br />

equivalent of the maintenance factors. However, a ship<br />

that sits at the pier won’t do much, so you need motivational<br />

factors, a propulsion device and rudder, to maneuver.<br />

In the day-to-day grind of trying to keep ahead of things, we<br />

often don’t think enough about enriching the job satisfaction of<br />

our subordinates. If you lead people, focus on providing at least<br />

one of the following things to everyone on your team:<br />

• Meaningful work – purposeful tasks that are perceived<br />

to be important<br />

• Responsibility – an appropriate level of autonomy in<br />

how a person carries out a task<br />

• Knowledge of the results of their efforts. Provide either<br />

direct feedback about how a specific task was completed<br />

or enable the worker to see how their efforts fit into the<br />

larger picture.<br />

Tom Moriarty, P.E., CMRP, is president of Alidade MER Inc.<br />

Contact him at tjmpe@alidade-mer.com and (321) 773-3356.<br />

www.PLANTSERVICES.com APRIL 2009 19


“Our business changes<br />

every six months.<br />

Our systems take a year<br />

to catch up.” Customer mandates, regulation and<br />

market conditions are changing faster<br />

than ever. How do you keep pace By the<br />

time you implement most enterprise<br />

applications your needs have already<br />

changed. The answer is IFS.<br />

IFS – first in enterprise agility<br />

• The first software package built from<br />

the ground-up on a Service-Oriented<br />

Component Architecture (SOCA), combining<br />

the agility of service orientation<br />

with the proven benefits of components<br />

• IFS’ seventh generation of components<br />

and second generation of SOA -- the<br />

most stable platform on the market<br />

• Roll out functionality in stages,<br />

addressing your needs in priority order<br />

• Easily integrate with legacy systems<br />

or other third-party software<br />

• ERP, EAM, SCM, CRM, PLM<br />

Read our white paper on Design, Operate, Maintain for valuable insight on<br />

how your maintenance activities can play a greater role in the success of<br />

your business. Call 1.888.437.4968 today to get your copy.<br />

SEE US ON PLANT SERVICES’ ONLINE CMMS COMPARISON TOOL.<br />

I F S – T H E G L O B A L E N T E R P R I S E A P P L I C AT I O N S C O M PA N Y<br />

www.IFSWORLD.com


asset manager<br />

david berger, P.Eng.<br />

new Roles for CMMS Vendors<br />

Expect more than a shrink-wrapped box of software<br />

AS CMMS software becomes more sophisticated and<br />

mission-critical, the dependence on your vendor increases.<br />

It’s therefore important not only to choose a CMMS package<br />

that is right for you, but a CMMS vendor with whom you<br />

can partner over the long term.<br />

As they move from suppliers of software licenses to full<br />

strategic partners, vendors have amassed a number of products<br />

and services that can help you manage your growing<br />

investment in assets.<br />

Best pRACtices<br />

One noteworthy change is the increasing reliance on vendor<br />

knowledge of asset-management best practices. You might<br />

assume that because a given vendor has sold CMMS software<br />

to hundreds or even thousands of companies, it must<br />

have acquired considerable knowledge. Savvy vendors have<br />

picked up on this supposition, and are offering many of the<br />

following products/services:<br />

Industry-specific software: As competition increases,<br />

CMMS vendors are looking for more marketable competitive<br />

advantages such as deep knowledge of a given industry.<br />

This includes software features that ensure compliance with<br />

industry-specific legislation, as well as more intimate understanding<br />

of industry practices. Some vendors have hired<br />

experts with extensive experience in a given industry to help<br />

develop relevant product and service offerings.<br />

Standard data: A handful of CMMS vendors have standard<br />

data to sell or provide free of charge when customers purchase<br />

their software. Standard data can include job plans, standard<br />

operating procedures (SOPs), preventive maintenance routines,<br />

estimated or standard hours to complete tasks and coded field<br />

options (e.g., problem and cause codes). Data can be specific to<br />

an asset type or classification, such as data for electrical devices.<br />

As well, it can be industry-specific, for example, data relevant to<br />

pulp and paper mills.<br />

Process mapping: CMMS vendors can facilitate process improvement<br />

during the software implementation. This typically<br />

involves drafting process maps reflecting the current state, and<br />

comparing them to future-state processes with the appropriate<br />

CMMS functionality. The gap between current and future<br />

states must be addressed carefully in terms of configuration of<br />

software, training on processes, project management and, most<br />

importantly, change management to ensure CMMS users buy<br />

into the new processes.<br />

Configuration: The flexibility of modern CMMS software<br />

is demonstrated by the ease with which it can be tailored to<br />

your needs, such as configuring menus, data entry screens,<br />

reports, alerts, approvals, equipment hierarchy and workflows.<br />

In years past, this often required customization, a<br />

term synonymous with a large, upfront investment in time<br />

and money, and a costly upgrade path. Today’s software<br />

A sMAll handful of CMMS vendors<br />

hAVe standARd data to sell, or<br />

provide free of chARge.<br />

is easy to configure to a wide range of business process<br />

options, regardless of company size, industry, competitive<br />

strength, level of sophistication or organizational readiness.<br />

Configuration takes little time and the cost is minimal<br />

compared to customization. Because the source code isn’t<br />

altered, there is little or no effect on the upgrade path.<br />

Training: Once best practices are embedded in procedures<br />

through process mapping and baked into the software via<br />

configuration, users must be trained in the new processes and<br />

supporting systems. The CMMS vendor plays a critical role,<br />

especially if industry experts are available who can better gain<br />

the trust and confidence of nervous users and skeptics.<br />

Consulting: If you have gaps in the capabilities or availability<br />

of specialized resources in your company, the CMMS<br />

vendor can fill them in with its consultants. For example,<br />

a vendor might have specialists who are familiar with best<br />

practices in implementing process, system and organizational<br />

change, as well as technical areas like call centers,<br />

reliability-centered maintenance, linear assets or calibration.<br />

Although CMMS vendors might not be 100% third-party<br />

objective, they usually can be relied upon to conduct surveys<br />

on organizational readiness before implementation and<br />

stakeholder satisfaction following implementation. Vendors<br />

also can assist with benchmarking other organizations.<br />

Web site: Users can tap the vendor’s Web site to search for<br />

and download information such as white papers, technical bulletins<br />

and conference proceedings that cover a host of relevant<br />

topics. In addition, some vendor Web sites provide opportunities<br />

for users to share tips and traps, solve problems in chat<br />

rooms and conduct surveys.<br />

www.PLANTSERVICES.com APRIL 2009 21


asset manager<br />

Fee for results<br />

One option (that hasn’t yet gained<br />

much momentum) is to pay the vendor<br />

based on long-term results. This can<br />

dramatically increase the probability<br />

of a successful implementation if objectives<br />

are well documented and communicated,<br />

payment is in the form of a<br />

bonus (not built into the base fee), users<br />

also receive an equally meaningful<br />

bonus for meeting the same objectives,<br />

and targets are achievable.<br />

dc: It’s not what<br />

it used to be<br />

ABB Inc.<br />

Low Voltage Motors<br />

800-752-0696<br />

www.abb.com/motors<br />

© Copyright 2009 ABB<br />

The ABB DMI – Leading edge DC motor technology<br />

With the DMI DC motor, ABB has made<br />

something good even better. ABB has<br />

applied the latest modeling software<br />

to ensure DMI motor designs have the<br />

most efficient magnetic flux and heat flows attainable.<br />

This leads to an increase in the power densities of each frame<br />

size, making more power available in a smaller package.<br />

ABB rotational brush gear design allows maintenance personnel<br />

to check and change brushes from either side of the motor.<br />

For more information, call 800-752-0696 or visit<br />

www.abb.com/motors.<br />

Software as a service<br />

Although CMMS vendors don’t yet define<br />

software as a service (SaaS) consistently,<br />

there are some common threads.<br />

At a minimum, a monthly subscription<br />

rate covers at least software licenses and<br />

maintenance fees, for example, $30 per<br />

module per user per month. At the other<br />

end of the spectrum, some SaaS providers<br />

bundle absolutely everything into the<br />

subscription price, including software,<br />

hosting infrastructure, maintenance,<br />

and unlimited support, training and<br />

implementation services. The pricing<br />

might be, say, $200 per 100-hour block<br />

of use, regardless of the number of<br />

named users or modules accessed.<br />

Users have jumped on the SaaS<br />

bandwagon because of the reduced<br />

burden on cash flow, the appeal of<br />

paying only for what is used, and the<br />

flexibility to scale up or down quickly<br />

in terms of functionality or the<br />

number of users. But, there’s no way<br />

to compare it to traditional pricing<br />

without crunching the numbers.<br />

Formal long-term partnership<br />

One extreme is a formal, long-term<br />

contract such as a joint venture or<br />

outsource arrangement. Most CMMS<br />

vendors are happy to work with a<br />

third-party contract maintenance<br />

company and supply the CMMS, but<br />

are reluctant to supply and manage<br />

the maintenance technicians or their<br />

managers. Perhaps this will eventually<br />

change if CMMS vendors continue<br />

on their current path of transformation,<br />

from CMMS software supplier to<br />

asset-management services provider.<br />

E-mail Contributing Editor David Berger,<br />

P.Eng., partner, Western Management<br />

Consultants, at david@wmc.on.ca.<br />

22 APRIL 2009 www.PLANTSERVICES.com<br />

ABBlovoIsland309.indd 1<br />

3/19/09 9:03:37 AM


Technology Toolbox<br />

Sheila Kennedy<br />

Alternative Materials<br />

High-tech options have steel, brass, copper and other metals on the run<br />

Scientists, engineers and manufacturers are expanding<br />

the choices for material of construction. They’re<br />

eliminating nano-scale flaws that promote corrosion,<br />

impregnating alloys to enhance bearing properties, developing<br />

copolymers that enhance performance, and leveraging<br />

amorphous metals and thermoplastics for new applications.<br />

Alloy refinements: Oxide scale that forms on steel alloys<br />

at high temperatures defends the metal from corrosion, but<br />

some carbon can get through. Scientists at the U.S. DOE’s<br />

Argonne National Laboratory detected a nano-scale flaw<br />

that allows carbon to dissolve and diffuse through the oxide<br />

scale and cause brittleness and corrosion.<br />

Argonne eliminated the iron and nickel nanoparticles and<br />

developed alloys that are more corrosion-resistant and exhibit<br />

as much as 10 times longer life than commercial alloys<br />

of similar chromium content. When commercialized, this<br />

could reduce costs for the chemical, petrochemical and refining<br />

industries. The findings can influence metal dusting,<br />

carburization, alloy development and surface coatings for<br />

high-temperature industrial as well as fuel cell applications.<br />

Sulfonated copolymers: These structures can provide a<br />

lower-cost, high-performance material for breathable protective<br />

clothing, sensor, actuator, filtration, energy-recovery<br />

and antifouling applications. The sulfonated copolymer<br />

technology in Kraton Polymer’s MD9150 and MD9200<br />

products exhibit water vapor transport, ion exchange,<br />

chemical resistance and gas permeability. The structure<br />

reduces processing temperatures, which saves energy. Kraton’s<br />

products are suited for wet and dry environments, and<br />

will be offered in membrane and solution forms for use in<br />

shapes, coatings and laminates.<br />

Babbitt impregnation: Materials that combine carbon’s<br />

hardness and wear resistance with graphite’s self-lubricating<br />

properties and babbitt’s resistance to galling led to hightemperature<br />

bearings. Metallized Carbon Corp.’s oil-free,<br />

self-lubricating high-temperature bearings (to 350°F ) made<br />

with Metcar grades M-161 and M-162 materials exhibit<br />

stability and strength They won’t score the mating shaft and<br />

provide continuous lubrication for their service life. The<br />

materials are applicable to mechanical components used<br />

in elevated-temperature applications where conventional<br />

lubricating methods are impractical.<br />

Amorphous metals: A material more durable than silicon<br />

and stronger than steel shows promise for the manufacture<br />

of nano-devices. Yale engineers developed amorphous metals<br />

– bulk metallic glasses (BMGs) with no structure beyond<br />

the atomic level – for molds that imprint fine details from<br />

13 nanometers to several millimeters. Grain size limits the<br />

level of detail imprinted. BMGs an be molded like plastics<br />

and are more wear-resistant than metals at normal working<br />

temperatures. Template molds made from this material are<br />

A MATerial more durable than silicon<br />

and stronger than steel shows promise<br />

for the MAnufacture of nano-devices.<br />

long-lasting, reliable and cost-effective. Nano-molds, -wires<br />

and -gears have been fabricated by molding metallic glass.<br />

Engineered thermoplastics: These provide a safe, costeffective<br />

alternative to copper, stainless steel and brass water<br />

valves for fluid-handling systems. Copper theft is a growing<br />

crime and the lead in brass alloys is a health hazard. From<br />

a design perspective, thermoplastic can be integrated into a<br />

single part, but metal involves assembling multiple parts.<br />

SABIC Innovative Plastics offers engineered thermoplastics,<br />

including Noryl and Ultem amorphous resins and LNP<br />

Lubricomp compounds. Noryl and Ultem creep less than<br />

semi-crystalline thermoplastics and preserve dimensions<br />

and valve sealing abilities. Noryl GFN1430V resin reduces<br />

fatigue and damage caused by pressure fluctuation because<br />

thinner wall sections are possible. The Noryl polyphenylene<br />

oxide (PPO) has better hot-water resistance than semicrystalline<br />

resins. SABIC’s Fluid Engineering Center of<br />

Excellence offers access to testing equipment and scientific<br />

resources to assist in developing fluid-handling solutions.<br />

E-mail Contributing Editor Sheila Kennedy, managing director of<br />

Additive Communications, at Sheila@addcomm.com.<br />

Reference Web sites:<br />

www.anl.gov<br />

www.metcar.com<br />

www.kraton.com<br />

www.yale.edu<br />

www.sabic-ip.com<br />

www.corrim.org<br />

www.PLANTSERVICES.com APRIL 2009 23


Power Up a Winner<br />

How to find the right asset management system<br />

By David Berger, P.Eng., Contributing Editor<br />

So, you’re thinking about a new or replacement computerized<br />

maintenance management system or enterprise<br />

asset management system (CMMS/EAM). Have you thought<br />

about what could go wrong I hate to be negative about it,<br />

but many studies over the years put the odds at more than<br />

50% that your CMMS/EAM system implementation will end<br />

in failure – even if this isn’t your first time trying.<br />

It’s therefore worth your while to try to understand the<br />

typical problems that companies face when selecting a CMMS.<br />

Choosing the right software is by no means a guarantee that<br />

you’ll be successful through to the end of implementation and<br />

beyond, but at least you’re off to a great start. The more time<br />

and effort you put into the initial planning, design and selection<br />

phases, the greater your prospects for success.<br />

Top 10 selection miSTakes<br />

Some of the typical blunders made when selecting a CMMS/<br />

EAM are described in a recent white paper titled, “10 Pitfalls<br />

to Avoid When Selecting a CMMS/EAM” (www.plantservices.<br />

com/knowledge_centers/infor/assets/wp_ten_pitfalls.pdf). This<br />

white paper, based on a reader survey <strong>Plant</strong> <strong>Services</strong> conducted<br />

in December 2008, details the top 10 selection mistakes:<br />

1. You’re far too focused on the software’s “look and feel.”<br />

2. You’re purchasing software based on functional fit only.<br />

3. You think your CMMS/EAM is just a static data and<br />

reporting system.<br />

4. You’re hung up on the slicing and dicing of CMMS/<br />

EAM data.<br />

5. You believe that “green” functionality is just today’s<br />

“flavor of the month.”<br />

6. You’re focused solely on how the CMMS/EAM will<br />

satisfy your current needs.<br />

7. You tend to focus on how the CMMS/EAM benefits your<br />

location, instead of what benefits the organization overall.<br />

8. You think implementing a single-vendor ERP/EAM solution<br />

translates into the most “fully integrated” solution.<br />

9. You think it’s always better to own and control your<br />

hardware, software and support services.<br />

10. You celebrate the day the CMMS/EAM system goes live.<br />

Do any of these mistakes sound familiar Your best defense<br />

is to allocate adequate time for the right resources in the early<br />

planning and selection stages. This can save you years of aggravation<br />

during and after implementation. Follow a solid, stepby-step<br />

methodology for designing new processes, developing<br />

the system requirements that support them, and selecting the<br />

right combination of CMMS/EAM package and vendor. Thus,<br />

to increase the odds that your CMMS/EAM software implementation<br />

will be a success, consider following these steps:<br />

24 APRIL 2009 www.PLANTSERVICES.com


Table 1. On tap at www.<strong>Plant</strong><strong>Services</strong>.com/CMMS_Review<br />

Company and<br />

Web site<br />

Aleier Inc.<br />

www.aleier.com<br />

Aleier Inc.<br />

www.aleier.com<br />

Ashcom Technologies, Inc.<br />

www.ashcomtech.com<br />

AssetPoint<br />

www.assetpoint.com<br />

Blue Mountain Quality<br />

Resources<br />

www.coolblue.com<br />

Centric Maintenance Systems<br />

www.centricmaintenance.com<br />

CWorks Systems Inc.<br />

www.cworkssystems.com<br />

Cybermetrics<br />

www.cybermetrics.com<br />

IBM<br />

www.ibm.com<br />

Infor<br />

www.infor.com<br />

IFS<br />

www.ifsworld.com<br />

Invensys<br />

www.avantis.net<br />

Ivara Corporation<br />

www.ivara.com<br />

Lawson Software<br />

www.lawson.com<br />

Maintenance Connection<br />

www.maintenanceconnection.com<br />

Megamation Systems Inc.<br />

www.megamation.com<br />

Mincom Inc.<br />

www.mincom.com<br />

Oracle<br />

www.oracle.com<br />

Package<br />

FM1i INNOVUS<br />

1.0.055<br />

FM1j<br />

interprise 6.2<br />

Review<br />

date<br />

Annual<br />

sales<br />

Number of<br />

customers<br />

12/13/06 $1.7 million More than<br />

50<br />

12/13/06 $1.7 million More than<br />

50<br />

Cost<br />

$19,750 per site, rental/hosted/<br />

ASP pricing customized<br />

Single-site enterprise $27,500,<br />

multi-site enterprise $37,950, rental/<br />

hosted/ASP pricing customized<br />

MaintiMizer 4.0 3/6/08 $3 million 3,500 $1,679 per concurrent user, hosted/<br />

ASP $90 per month per user<br />

TabWare EFX<br />

EFX00<br />

Regulatory<br />

Asset Manager<br />

R2<br />

API Pro<br />

V5Xe SP2<br />

CareWorks<br />

4.0.0<br />

2/27/06 Less than<br />

$25 million<br />

1/9/09 Less than<br />

$20 million<br />

Annual<br />

maintenance<br />

cost<br />

22%<br />

20%<br />

18%<br />

123 $4,000-$7,000 per concurrent user 20%<br />

50 $18,750 for 5 users, $37,500 for 10<br />

users includes server license, $2,000<br />

per additional user, unlimited requester<br />

licenses included with all systems<br />

1/12/07 $6 million 350 $5,000 per concurrent user, rental<br />

$250/month/concurrent user<br />

3/16/09 Less than<br />

$5 million<br />

FaciliWorks 8i 2/6/06 $3.9 million More than<br />

1,500<br />

IBM<br />

Maximo Asset<br />

Management<br />

7.1<br />

3/2/09 More than<br />

$200<br />

million<br />

Infor EAM 8.4 2/23/09 More than<br />

$120<br />

million<br />

IFS<br />

Applications 7<br />

Avantis.<br />

PRO 4.1<br />

Ivara<br />

SuprEAM 5.0<br />

Lawson<br />

Enterprise<br />

Asset Management<br />

(EAM)<br />

Maintenance<br />

Connection Onsite/Online<br />

2.5<br />

DirectLine<br />

2.14<br />

Mincom<br />

Ellipse 6.3<br />

Oracle Utilities<br />

Work and<br />

Asset Management<br />

1.7.15.2<br />

1/18/07 $150-$200<br />

million<br />

2/10/06 More than<br />

$35 million<br />

700 $2,100 per concurrent user (minimum<br />

3), ASP $60/month/concurrent user<br />

More than<br />

10,000<br />

More than<br />

15,000<br />

More than<br />

2,500<br />

1/26/07 $16 million More than<br />

60<br />

5/21/07 $41 million More than<br />

250<br />

2/29/08 Less than<br />

$25 million<br />

$2,499 server license plus<br />

$1,699 per concurrent user<br />

$4,770 per user (minimum 5);<br />

enterprise 50 registered users for<br />

$150,000-$175,000 (add-on modules<br />

extra), hosted/ASP starts at<br />

$9,000/year for up to 10 users<br />

$4,799-$9,995 per concurrent user,<br />

$1,599-$3,395 per named user, SaaS<br />

at $99/month/named user, hosted/<br />

ASP $33/month/named user<br />

Infrastructure hosting $5,000-<br />

$7,000/month plus license costs<br />

15%<br />

15%-18%<br />

15% (free<br />

if ASP)<br />

21%<br />

20%<br />

20%<br />

18%<br />

720 $5,000 per concurrent user 18%<br />

Site license or rental fee based<br />

on business metrics<br />

$2,460-$3,800 per named user<br />

(minimum 20)<br />

500 $2,799 per concurrent user, rental/<br />

hosted/ASP, $199/month/user<br />

3/5/09 $4.5 million 550 $195 per 80 hrs of use (unlimited named<br />

users), including training, support,<br />

hosting all infrastructure, upgrades<br />

More than<br />

$150<br />

million<br />

2/11/08 $18 billion<br />

total<br />

company<br />

More than<br />

650<br />

$4,400 per concurrent user, hosted/<br />

ASP $7,000-$70,000/month<br />

$2,995 per user (0-75), $2,495 per user<br />

(76-150), $1,995 per user (more than<br />

150); hosted/ASP available, pricing<br />

depends on scope<br />

20%<br />

18%<br />

18%<br />

Included<br />

22%<br />

Smartware Group<br />

www.bigfootcmms.com<br />

Bigfoot CMMS<br />

Internet/<br />

Enterprise<br />

Edition 8.0.1<br />

2/28/08 Less than<br />

$5 million<br />

1,032 Subscription $33 per month per user,<br />

minimum 5; Hosted/ASP $22,500 for<br />

20 users and 20 requestors; $500 per<br />

additional user<br />

18% (free<br />

if Bigfoot<br />

hosts)<br />

www.PLANTSERVICES.com APRIL 2009 25


GET RECESSION-<br />

FIGHTING SAVINGS<br />

WITH CLAYTON<br />

STEAM BOILERS<br />

Worldwide Energy<br />

Savings: $134-Million!<br />

You can save a bundle in energy<br />

costs and gain production-boosting<br />

performance, too. How With Clayton<br />

steam boilers, noted worldwide for<br />

keeping fuel consumption low and<br />

reducing greenhouse gas emissions<br />

(In just one year, for example, plants<br />

around the globe that used Clayton<br />

steam boilers saved $134-million in<br />

fuel costs.)<br />

Other benefits: unique counterflow<br />

technology for better efficiency,<br />

small footprint, low NOx emissions,<br />

quick start-ups, even pressure<br />

when demand fluctuates and great<br />

performance on numerous fuels or<br />

combinations.<br />

Clayton steam boilers.<br />

Benefiting budgets for 79 years.<br />

17477 Hurley Street<br />

City of Industry, CA 91744-5106<br />

800.423.4585 tel • 626.435.0180 fax<br />

email: sales@claytonindustries.com<br />

www.claytonindustries.com<br />

performance / software<br />

Table 2. Sample Selection Criteria<br />

Company Information Weight<br />

Company profile 4<br />

Financial position 6<br />

Customer installations 5<br />

Competitive advantage 5<br />

20<br />

Product & Hardware<br />

Configurability 4<br />

Web architecture 2<br />

Open systems 3<br />

9<br />

Technical Information<br />

Recovery & backup 2<br />

Auditing & security 2<br />

Documentation 2<br />

Interface requirements 4<br />

10<br />

Support <strong>Services</strong><br />

Support 6<br />

Ease of implementation 10<br />

Training 5<br />

21<br />

Cost Effectiveness<br />

Base package 35<br />

Options & additions 10<br />

Ongoing services 10<br />

General 5<br />

60<br />

Technical Specs<br />

User interface 16<br />

Work planning & scheduling 16<br />

Health, safety & environment 16<br />

Maintenance optimization 16<br />

KPIs & analysis tools 16<br />

80<br />

Total Score 200<br />

Build process/system requirements:<br />

One of the most critical steps in planning<br />

for a new or replacement CMMS/EAM<br />

is to determine your needs. Procuring a<br />

CMMS/EAM system isn’t about finding<br />

the best software package on the market.<br />

The key to a successful implementation<br />

is selecting a CMMS/EAM package that<br />

best fits with your requirements. There<br />

are many wonderful CMMS/EAM packages<br />

available today, but every one of<br />

them has its strengths and weaknesses.<br />

Your task is to determine user specifications<br />

based on the needs of stakeholders<br />

(e.g., maintenance, operations, engineering,<br />

IT, materials management, purchasing,<br />

finance), and then choose the<br />

combination of CMMS/EAM vendor and<br />

software package that can best deliver on<br />

your needs.<br />

It’s critical to invest about three to six<br />

months in the design of new processes<br />

and supporting system specifications<br />

with participation of key stakeholders.<br />

This must be done before the selection<br />

phase begins so you can filter the sales<br />

pitch from each vendor and steer them<br />

to exactly what you need to see demonstrated<br />

to determine the best fit. Many<br />

companies naively believe that there’s no<br />

point in spending time on process design<br />

until the system has been selected. Although<br />

it’s true that your process design<br />

can’t be finalized at a detailed level before<br />

knowing which software package you’ll<br />

purchase, it also has been shown through<br />

30 years of track records that neglecting<br />

to engage stakeholders in process design<br />

before the selection will increase the<br />

probability of failure.<br />

The methodology should define<br />

process flows that reflect the current state<br />

and the desired future state. The futurestate<br />

processes will be supported by best<br />

practices and enabling system specifications.<br />

For example, perhaps the future<br />

state processes indicate stakeholder desire<br />

to move to a more planned environment<br />

from the current state of firefighting. Reducing<br />

the high percentage of emergency<br />

and reactive maintenance requires more<br />

preventive and condition-based maintenance,<br />

better planning and scheduling,<br />

and a variety of analysis tools for<br />

managing the transition. Addressing the<br />

gap between current state and the desired<br />

state presents a number of challenges that<br />

should be discussed long before a system<br />

is selected, such as:<br />

26 APRIL 2009 www.PLANTSERVICES.com


performance / software<br />

What organizational changes are<br />

necessary to support the future state<br />

(e.g., add a maintenance planner and<br />

change the shift structure)<br />

What changes in management attitude<br />

and support are required (e.g., no<br />

longer tolerate, say, a chronic overtime<br />

problem and a lack of documentation<br />

of work requests and work orders<br />

completed)<br />

What “get ready” activities are needed<br />

(e.g., inventorying assets, determining<br />

asset criticality, and developing PM job<br />

plans for at least critical assets)<br />

Throughout the process/system design<br />

phase you can also identify Quick<br />

Wins, or improvements that can be<br />

made immediately because they don’t<br />

rely on implementing the new CMMS/<br />

EAM package. These provide immediate<br />

savings, and they also generate<br />

excitement, build momentum and<br />

establish credibility for the project.<br />

Develop a request for proposal: Once<br />

the system requirements supporting<br />

the future state process flows have been<br />

established, the next step is to draft an<br />

RFP and send it to at least three CMMS/<br />

EAM vendors that are most likely<br />

to provide a best fit. If you’re unsure<br />

which vendors are good candidates,<br />

then conduct some research, such as<br />

examining the <strong>Plant</strong> <strong>Services</strong> CMMS/<br />

EAM Software Review (www.plantser<br />

vices.com/cmms_review) to get a feel for<br />

which packages offer which features and<br />

functions. The review site allows users<br />

to manipulate the weightings of about<br />

350 criteria to better understand which<br />

packages fit with your requirements.<br />

As of this month, it includes vetted<br />

information on the capabilities of 19<br />

packages (Table 1) including six that are<br />

new for 2009.<br />

The RFP should outline your company,<br />

including the organizational<br />

structure, your current technology<br />

environment, the reason for launching<br />

the CMMS/EAM project, and your<br />

definition of success for the project, both<br />

quantitative and qualitative. There also<br />

should be a section on your procurement<br />

policy, key steps in the procurement<br />

process, expected timeline, and<br />

any terms and conditions. Be aware that<br />

throwing in too many nonnegotiable<br />

constraints might scare away vendors<br />

because it’s not worth their while. Of<br />

course, the RFP provides technical user<br />

requirements, such as “ability to create a<br />

third-party invoice for labor and materials<br />

the technicians used” and general<br />

requirements like “ability to define<br />

default values for any field.” The CMMS/<br />

EAM Software Review offers many<br />

more examples of user requirements.<br />

Establish a vendor selection com-<br />

How in the can we keep<br />

running out of the we<br />

need to do our job<br />

Chances are, if you could fill in the blanks above, you would enjoy talking with us.<br />

Since 1992 our company has done nothing but develop technology to help manage<br />

the type of inventory you see in the picture above. If you need better control,<br />

better accountability, complete inventory visibility, automated predictive ordering for<br />

upcoming maintenance tasks, easy supply chain communication and optimum<br />

purchasing and replenishment of your indirect material, then you should give us a<br />

call today.<br />

1.888.419.1399 or visit www.cribmaster.com<br />

www.PLANTSERVICES.com APRIL 2009 27


performance / SOftwARE<br />

Ready for<br />

Change<br />

Now is the time!<br />

VIBXPERT ®<br />

—A new choice for<br />

Vibration Analysis<br />

and Balancing<br />

Affordability does not have<br />

to come at the expense of<br />

quality and performance.<br />

Enjoy the benefits of free<br />

updates, low ownership cost<br />

and unlimited tech support<br />

from the proven leaders of<br />

shaft alignment technology.<br />

Watch<br />

VIDEO<br />

Online<br />

Class 1 Division 1<br />

EX model optional.<br />

Also available<br />

online condition<br />

monitoring systems.<br />

305-591-8935 • www.ludeca.com<br />

Turn on www.<strong>Plant</strong><strong>Services</strong>.com/cmmS_Review<br />

The <strong>Plant</strong> <strong>Services</strong> CMMS/EAM Software Review is designed to allow you to<br />

compare packages across a comprehensive range of capabilities. It offers<br />

the option of weighting capabilities to reflect their importance in your application<br />

and receiving a calculated ranking of the software offerings according<br />

to your specifications.<br />

As the “Introduction” screen<br />

explains, you can use the review<br />

to simply browse the results of<br />

our verified vendor survey data,<br />

compare products and find<br />

further information on particular<br />

packages and vendors. Or, you<br />

can have the system rank packages<br />

according your customized<br />

and advanced criteria. Clicking<br />

on “Software Aspects” lets you<br />

weight them individually so the<br />

Introduction screen<br />

comparison engine can calculate<br />

scores and present packages<br />

according to how well their<br />

strengths match your weightings.<br />

Clicking on an individual<br />

software aspect in the “Introduction”<br />

screen brings you to a<br />

“Priorities” screen, which shows<br />

the exact survey questions used<br />

to establish the package score<br />

for that aspect. Exercising your<br />

option to rank a question less Priorities screen<br />

than “very important” factors<br />

its score so it has less weight<br />

in the calculated comparison.<br />

You can hand-pick packages<br />

and compare them for various<br />

aspects, or enter weightings and<br />

priorities and click “calculate”<br />

to bring you to the comparison Comparison screen<br />

screen. Here, you’ll see a sideby-side<br />

comparison detailing the level of functionality for each capability.<br />

The site also offers articles, white papers and resources to help you<br />

increase your familiarity with CMMS/EAM software, solve problems<br />

and get the most from your existing or future implementation.<br />

mittee: To ensure the key stakeholders<br />

are well represented when selecting the<br />

CMMS/EAM vendor and software, it’s<br />

important to establish a vendor selection<br />

committee. This committee is best<br />

kept to approximately 7-12 people for<br />

greater efficiency and effectiveness.<br />

You always can supplement the process<br />

with additional stakeholders by inviting<br />

specialists to various activities during the<br />

selection phase. For example, you might<br />

want to have a few technicians and their<br />

supervisors attend when the vendors are<br />

demonstrating their mobile solution, or<br />

people from purchasing during demos of<br />

the spare parts procurement process.<br />

Determine short-list evaluation<br />

criteria: In the first meeting of the<br />

28 APRIL 2009 www.PLANTSERVICES.com


vendor selection committee, consensus<br />

must be reached on what criteria will<br />

be used to short-list proposals. Obviously,<br />

it’s futile to evaluate proponents<br />

at a detailed level without using or at<br />

least seeing the package, and meeting<br />

the vendor. But just like short-listing a<br />

stack of resumes, more general criteria<br />

can be used to fairly evaluate the written<br />

material received.<br />

The survey for the aforementioned “10<br />

Pitfalls …” white paper asked users to<br />

rank 21 CMMS/EAM selection criteria<br />

in terms of importance to their organization,<br />

then in terms of how well their current<br />

CMMS performs them. The results,<br />

which are detailed in the paper, offer a<br />

perspective on selection criteria that may<br />

make sense for your organization.<br />

Table 2 provides a sample breakdown<br />

of selection criteria and associated<br />

weightings. By adding columns for<br />

each vendor proposal, the vendor selection<br />

committee can use such a table to<br />

rate, score and compare vendors.<br />

Note that the weighting and scoring of<br />

the evaluation criteria is a subjective process.<br />

Different stakeholders have varying<br />

opinions on what is important, and this<br />

is why it’s critical to build consensus. Try<br />

to finalize the table before receiving any<br />

vendor responses to avoid any prejudice.<br />

Read through the proposals: Each<br />

vendor selection committee member<br />

should read through the proposals to get<br />

an overall feeling for how the vendors responded.<br />

Ratings shouldn’t be attempted<br />

in the first reading, however, notes should<br />

be made on each proposal, otherwise<br />

you’ll forget your initial impressions.<br />

Rate the proposals: Each vendor selection<br />

committee member should, on their<br />

own, attempt to short-list the proposals.<br />

This is best accomplished by completing<br />

the rating table. The many ways to rate<br />

vendors all have a lot of of subjectivity.<br />

One suggested approach is to read<br />

through only the sections relevant to a<br />

given selection criterion for the proposals.<br />

As you read through the relevant<br />

section of each proposal, physically rank<br />

the proposals. Thus, if there were 15<br />

proposals submitted, at the end of the<br />

performance / software<br />

read-through on, say, the first selection<br />

criterion (Company Profile), you’ll have a<br />

pile of 15 proposals sitting on your desk<br />

with the uppermost proposal being the<br />

best and the proposal at the bottom of<br />

the pile being the worst response to the<br />

first selection criterion.<br />

Then, each proposal must be rated<br />

with the highest score possible being<br />

equal to the weighting, and the lowest<br />

score zero. Two or more proposals<br />

might receive the same score for a given<br />

selection criterion. You don’t have to give<br />

any proposal a perfect score (i.e., a rating<br />

equal to the weighting) if you feel none<br />

deserve it, because the rating process is<br />

strictly a means of determining relative<br />

scores. This physical ranking followed<br />

by rating of the proposals is repeated for<br />

each selection criterion.<br />

When rating the cost-effectiveness<br />

category, an easy way is to assign the<br />

cheapest solution the highest rating and<br />

the most expensive solution the lowest<br />

rating. The difference is then apportioned<br />

for the balance of respondents.<br />

Final rating of vendors: The vendor<br />

selection committee reaches consensus<br />

on the ratings for each of the proposals.<br />

One way is to have the person best qualified<br />

to evaluate the proposals on a given<br />

criterion begin the discussion by stating<br />

the highest score and who received it.<br />

Discussion might ensue, but eventually<br />

the group will agree on a winner(s) and<br />

their score. This process is repeated for<br />

the lowest score for the same criterion,<br />

followed by the rest of the proposals. It’s<br />

critical to be accurate on the relative ratings<br />

but not as critical to be accurate on<br />

the absolute value of any given score.<br />

Short-list vendors: Eventually, the<br />

group will complete the table with<br />

agreed-upon scores, and extract a short<br />

list. If at all possible, only two or possibly<br />

one vendor should be short-listed to<br />

maximize the opportunity to analyze<br />

in detail their software solution(s)<br />

before a firm contract is in place.<br />

Follow-up to short-listed vendors:<br />

Some of the vendors who don’t make the<br />

short list might request a postmortem on<br />

their proposals. Retain the rating table<br />

Looking for<br />

CMMS/EAM<br />

Software that<br />

Works Your Way<br />

You Found It!<br />

Contact us<br />

SOMAX®<br />

(770) 518-1514 x12<br />

WWW.SOMAX.COM<br />

www.PLANTSERVICES.com APRIL 2009 29


performance / SOFTwARE<br />

New for 2009 at www.<strong>Plant</strong><strong>Services</strong>.com/cmmS_Review<br />

Blue Mountain<br />

Regulatory<br />

Asset Manager,<br />

designed for life sciences, is well suited<br />

for companies with strong compliance<br />

requirements. Built with rigorous life<br />

science business practices in mind, the<br />

software system is a complete CMMS/<br />

EAM with integral functionality to maintain<br />

control over maintenance costs and<br />

compliance requirements. Compliance<br />

and business processes are mapped<br />

into the software, helping ensure strict<br />

compliance to and documentation of<br />

procedures and processes. The package<br />

also offers the best-in-class calibration<br />

and validation management functionality<br />

required by life science companies.<br />

www.coolblue.com/Maintenance<br />

cworks Systems Inc.<br />

believes the essence<br />

of a successful<br />

system is the easy<br />

collection of detail information so that<br />

when it is condensed in reports nothing<br />

important is missing. In addition,<br />

it is critical that all users adopt the<br />

system as THE SOURCE of information<br />

on maintenance work without recourse<br />

to hardcopy or other data records. The<br />

key to this is to ensure that it is easy<br />

to use and intuitive. The system also<br />

needs to provide appropriate and current<br />

data so that it can be used to identify<br />

problems areas and point to continuous<br />

improvement, particularly as pertains<br />

to preventive maintenance routines.<br />

www.cworkssystems.com<br />

IBM Maximo<br />

Asset Management<br />

delivers a<br />

comprehensive view of all asset types<br />

– production, delivery, facilities, infrastructure,<br />

transportation and IT – across<br />

an enterprise. This holistic perspective<br />

allows companies to see all of their<br />

assets. To help maximize the return on<br />

these assets, Maximo provides the ability<br />

to develop comprehensive programs<br />

for preventive, predictive, routine and<br />

unplanned maintenance. Together,<br />

these programs help reduce costs and<br />

increase asset reliability. Maximo is used<br />

in a wide range of industries including<br />

manufacturing, construction, transportation,<br />

utilities and telecommunications.<br />

www.ibm.com/doing/maximo<br />

Infor acquires<br />

and develops<br />

functionally<br />

rich software backed by thousands<br />

of domain experts and then makes it<br />

better through continuous innovation,<br />

faster implementation options, global<br />

enablement, and flexible buying options.<br />

In a few short years, Infor has<br />

become the third-largest provider of<br />

business software. Infor EAM solutions<br />

are used by more than 20,000<br />

asset-intensive companies, including<br />

manufacturers, distributors and services<br />

organizations to maximize return<br />

on assets, increase asset availability,<br />

eliminate risk, minimize energy consumption<br />

and reduce operating costs.<br />

www.infor.com/eam<br />

Founded in 1984, Megamation<br />

Systems has<br />

been providing maintenance<br />

management<br />

solutions for more than<br />

25 years. Megamation’s flagship offering<br />

is DirectLine maintenance management<br />

software as a service (SaaS) delivered<br />

over the Internet. DirectLine is designed<br />

to help clients streamline work orders,<br />

perform comprehensive preventive<br />

maintenance and leverage industry best<br />

practices. It is one of the most featurerich,<br />

customizable and reliable maintenance<br />

solutions available. In the company’s<br />

past three annual surveys, more<br />

than 98% of clients say that DirectLine<br />

meets or exceeds their software needs.<br />

www.megamation.com<br />

Mincom is a<br />

leading software<br />

and services<br />

provider specializing in enterprise asset<br />

management (EAM) solutions for<br />

asset-intensive organizations in mining,<br />

utilities, transport, defense and government.<br />

Mincom’s solutions integrate business<br />

processes and deliver insight into<br />

global operations. Mincom’s people have<br />

successfully linked organizations with<br />

their mission-critical assets for almost<br />

30 years, delivering dramatic process<br />

improvement and reduced costs. Mincom<br />

is owned by Francisco Partners – one of<br />

the world’s largest technology-focused<br />

private equity firms, with approximately<br />

$5 billion of capital under management.<br />

www.mincom.com<br />

and backup notes from the vendor selection committee meeting<br />

so you can give objective reasons why it wasn’t short-listed.<br />

Individual committee member evaluation: Immediately<br />

following vendor demonstrations for each short-listed vendor,<br />

selection committee members must complete individual<br />

detailed ratings, line-by-line, on the specification. Note<br />

that any vendor involved in the demos should prove that its<br />

software works using your data and your processes. This is<br />

accomplished by supplying vendors, at least one week in advance<br />

of their demos, a series of test scripts or scenarios and<br />

accompanying data for your critical or complex processes.<br />

Other key inputs into the evaluation process are at least<br />

three reference checks, at least two site visits, and any other<br />

meetings where contact is made with the vendor, such as any<br />

preliminary meetings to negotiate terms.<br />

Vendor selection committee evaluation: Detailed ratings<br />

are presented for committee discussion and approval, and a<br />

master evaluation rating sheet is prepared reflecting consensus<br />

of the group. Ratings are multiplied by weightings and tabulated<br />

for all items. A selection matrix is written that compares<br />

the evaluation criteria, including the technical specification on<br />

a detailed, line-by-line basis. The committee then approves the<br />

final vendor selection and presents its recommendations for<br />

ratification by senior management.<br />

30 APRIL 2009 www.PLANTSERVICES.com


Compressor<br />

Power<br />

Is Not Measured<br />

by aMps Alone<br />

Too often, and most incorrectly, amperage alone is<br />

thought to be an accurate reflection of kilowatts (kW),<br />

which is then used to calculate an air compressor’s full-load<br />

specific power (scfm/kW) or to estimate flow (scfm). It’s<br />

equally incorrect to use this estimated kW to calculate the<br />

percent of full load in the capacity-control cycle.<br />

Of course, kilowatts are a function of amperage:<br />

kW = (A x V x 1.732 x pf)/1,000<br />

where kW = input kilowatts, A = motor current (amperes),<br />

V = line voltage and pf = power factor.<br />

But, you can calculate kW from measured amperage only<br />

if you simultaneously measure the voltage and power factor,<br />

or use a kW meter or motor analyzer for a direct reading.<br />

Table 1 is from an air audit intended to show the power<br />

savings, even at full load, of a variable-speed, rotary-screw<br />

lubricated compressor. The data are based on using current<br />

to find specific power for two 100-hp-class rotary screw<br />

compressors. Which option appears to be the most efficient<br />

It appears that the unit with the VSD is the best choice.<br />

Table 2 shows a more rigorous estimation of specific<br />

power. The truth is that the guess was wrong because of<br />

believing that amps directly reflect kW, which isn’t the case.<br />

Annual operATing cost<br />

A plant once found that its two 150-hp rotary-screw compressors<br />

couldn’t maintain a minimum pressure (Figure 1).<br />

Table 1. Current-based calculATion<br />

Constant-speed drive<br />

Variable-speed drive<br />

Performance 490 acfm @ 100 psig = 110 bhp 490 acfm @ 100 psig = 110 bhp<br />

Power 133 amps / 460 V / 60 Hz / 3 phase 130 amps / 460 V / 60 Hz / 3 phase<br />

Efficiency and power factor ME = 0.923 PF = 0.84 ME = 0.958 PF = 0.944<br />

Specific power 3.684 cfm / amp 3.769 cfm / amp<br />

Table 2. KilowATTs tell the truTH<br />

Specific power<br />

Constant-speed drive<br />

kW = (133)(460)(1.732)(0.84)<br />

1,000<br />

$38,986/year at $0.05 kWh, 8,760 hours<br />

Variable-speed drive<br />

= 89.01 kW kW = (130)(460)(1.732)(0.944)<br />

1,000<br />

5.5 acfm/kW 5.0 acfm/kW<br />

= 97.77 kW<br />

$42,828/year at $0.05 kWh, 8,760 hours<br />

www.PLANTSERVICES.com APRIL 2009 31


Efficiency / Compressors<br />

Turbulence-driven back pressure<br />

110 psig<br />

2” 2”<br />

2”<br />

psig<br />

107 97 psig psig<br />

3”<br />

psig<br />

750 cfm cfm at 110 psig at<br />

110 psig<br />

110 psig<br />

2” 2”<br />

2”<br />

107 psig<br />

750 cfm at 110 psig<br />

750 cfm at 110 psig<br />

psig<br />

750 cfm cfm at 110 psig at<br />

110 psig<br />

Figure 1. The turbulence-driven backpressure at the tee fitting<br />

Typical electric motor operating characteristics (.90 ME)<br />

causes one of the two units to short-cycle or back down. Both<br />

units kW ME/ can’t Amps feed into the air system at full load due to the piping<br />

% PF %<br />

configuration % 100 and size.<br />

750 cfm at 110 psig<br />

100<br />

750 cfm at 110 psig<br />

Graphical aPProach<br />

Part load<br />

87%<br />

75<br />

84%<br />

100 80<br />

kW ME/ Amps<br />

% 60 PF<br />

75 50%<br />

% 100<br />

100<br />

50<br />

40<br />

87%<br />

75<br />

84%<br />

100<br />

25 20 80<br />

No load<br />

Efficiency<br />

Amps<br />

Power factor<br />

Watts<br />

69%<br />

flow<br />

80%<br />

flow<br />

Rated<br />

load<br />

60 0 0<br />

75 500 13 25 48 50 63 75 88 100<br />

% Power (kW)<br />

Efficiency<br />

Note:<br />

1. These operating characteristics will vary with motor type,<br />

50<br />

40<br />

basic design, motor efficiency, constant or variable speed, etc.<br />

2. Amperage will vary indirectly with changes in rated voltage. 80%<br />

It is best to measure kW directly.<br />

flow<br />

3. 20 87% amp = 80% power<br />

25<br />

69%<br />

flow<br />

110<br />

0<br />

100 0<br />

Actual 0 modulation 13 25 48 50 63 75 88 100<br />

90 performace curve<br />

100% load<br />

% Power (kW)<br />

80<br />

100% power<br />

85% power<br />

Note:<br />

70<br />

No load<br />

35% flow<br />

60 69% power<br />

1. These operating characteristics will vary with motor type,<br />

Estimated flow = 215 X .35 = 75 acfm<br />

50 basic design, motor efficiency, constant or variable speed, etc.<br />

2. 40 Amperage will vary indirectly Note: The with actual changes no load modulation in rated point voltage.<br />

will vary with each compressor. To establish<br />

30 It is best to measure kW actual directly. curve, measure kW at full load at rated<br />

20<br />

pressure and kW at point where valve closed<br />

3. 87% amp = 80% power before blowdown. Draw appropriate curve.<br />

10<br />

Figure 0 2. Use this graph to estimate power as a function of motor<br />

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100<br />

current.<br />

110<br />

% Flow<br />

100 Actual modulation<br />

90 performace curve<br />

32 APRIL 2009 www.PLANTSERVICES.com<br />

80<br />

85% power<br />

70<br />

% kW power<br />

No load<br />

Part load<br />

3”<br />

110 psig<br />

Amps<br />

Power factor<br />

Watts<br />

97 psig psig<br />

Typical electric motor operating characteristics (.90 ME)<br />

Rated<br />

load<br />

100% load<br />

100% power<br />

The service provider used current to identify percent of load<br />

to indicate if additional compressors are needed. The service<br />

provider found the full-load amperage (FLA) for each unit<br />

to be 194 amps at 460 V at 100 psig. Both units draw 106<br />

amps to 174 amps (55% to 90% of FLA). The service provider<br />

concluded that when both units are at 90% of full load, they<br />

have 20% total reserve. The ensuing recommendation was to<br />

buy a third 150-hp unit to handle the perceived air demand.<br />

What’s really going on<br />

The service provider calculated the full-load amperage<br />

(FLA) at 480 V using: 162 hp x 1.20 = 194 A at 480 V. But,<br />

the actual voltage was 430 V (10.4% low). The calculation<br />

should have used a 10.4% higher amperage reading (194 x<br />

1.104), or 214.2 amps. The actual data, measured with a motor<br />

analyzer, was 215 amps at 430 V at 125 kW.<br />

Adding the voltage measurement gave a percent of<br />

FLA that ranges from 49% to 81%, not 55% to 90%. More<br />

importantly, the actual power measured ranged from 92.3<br />

kW (75%) to 98.4 kW (80%). This put the two units at 80%<br />

power, 35% to 40% flow for each (less than the total for one).<br />

The service provider concluded that a third unit certainly is<br />

needed. So, why can’t the plant hold pressure if there’s still<br />

900 cfm of air left<br />

Piping correction needed<br />

The fix was to increase the line size to to reduce line velocity<br />

and replace the right-angle crossing tee with angle-entry fitting<br />

to eliminate turbulent backpressure. The turbulence at<br />

the crossing tee in combination with smaller pipe wouldn’t<br />

allow both units to run together at full load. The unit seeing<br />

the highest backpressure modulated down and sometimes<br />

short-cycled. A third unit would mean installing another<br />

crossing tee and the increased flow would increase the air<br />

velocity, making a poor situation worse.<br />

After making this change, most of the time the plant runs<br />

on one unit. When the second unit comes on, it satisfies the<br />

extra demand, unloads and shuts off. Previously, when the<br />

second unit came online, it fought with the first unit at the<br />

crossing tee. Both units ran continuously at an unobserved<br />

part load. This was a very expensive misinterpretation.<br />

The electrical energy operating cost to run two units with<br />

the original piping was $91,536/year ((92.3 kW + 98.4 kW)<br />

x $0.06 kWh x 8,000 hr/yr). The electrical energy operating<br />

cost to run one unit, with corrected piping, at or near full<br />

load is $59,040/year (123 kW x $0.06 kWh x 8,000 hr/yr).<br />

The annual electrical energy cost savings is $32,496.<br />

The operating cost expense of a third unit (estimated 90<br />

kW) would have been $43,200/year (90 kW x $0.06 kWh x<br />

8,000 hours/year and the avoided capital expense and installation<br />

of a new unit was $50,000. Cost to correct the connection<br />

and replace the original copper line with larger, coated<br />

aluminum pipe and reusable fittings was $15,500.


Efficiency / Compressors<br />

When amps will do<br />

It’s possible to use measured current to approximate the<br />

input power and flow on a positive-displacement compressor<br />

when it’s not practical or possible to measure kW directly.<br />

Motor current measurements clearly delineate full load<br />

from no load (and blow down, if applicable) on a two-step<br />

control. This fact allows you to measure the proportion of<br />

the time the unit is loaded and establish an average flow.<br />

Estimated average kW might best be found by using the<br />

standard CAC/DOE performance curves with the appropriate<br />

storage and blow down time as part of the calculation.<br />

Converting the measured motor current to estimated<br />

kW and using these standard CAC/DOE curves might be a<br />

little tricky if you want to correctly identify input power and<br />

convert it to estimated flow using modulation, variable-displacement,<br />

or variable-speed capacity controls. The relative<br />

speed on the VSD also is directly proportional to flow.<br />

Remember some key facts regarding motor amperage.<br />

First, the amperage curve isn’t proportional to power from<br />

100% load to no load. Second, current measured without<br />

voltage gives inaccurate results. Amperage varies inversely<br />

with 7x4.875/4c voltage. If 2/20/03 the 460 line 12:30 voltage PM is 8% Page low (423 1 V), then<br />

more resources at www.plantservices.com<br />

Topic<br />

search<br />

Power quality “Unbalanced currents”<br />

Capacity controls “Compressor capacity controls”<br />

Control systems “Control options in<br />

rotary screw compressors”<br />

Proper line sizes “The secret is in the pipe”<br />

Compressed air audits “On the hunt”<br />

Compressor controls “The rise and fall of modulation”<br />

System audits “Before you call for help”<br />

For more, search www.<strong>Plant</strong><strong>Services</strong>.com<br />

using the keywords backpressure, FLA and Vsd.<br />

the current will be 8% high. At 460 V, 110 hp would require<br />

137 A (hp x 1.25). At 430 V, it would require about 147 A.<br />

This condition normally would be considered acceptable.<br />

The power company’s supply, nominally 480 V, is allowed to<br />

vary by 10%, within limits. The voltage is allowed to fluctuate<br />

from 420 V to 510 V and still be called a nominal 460 V.<br />

To have a useful amp reading, measure the voltage simultaneously.<br />

A good guideline is that for a 460 V system, the<br />

full load amps (below 100 hp) is about 1.25 times horsepowr.<br />

"Thanks, MCEMAX!"<br />

Why wrangle with your motors all weekend when you<br />

could be reeling in a fish or two MCEMAX by PdMA<br />

makes it easy to monitor motor conditions. Track, trend<br />

and analyze test data from both dynamic and static<br />

operations. Plan or avoid motor downtime. Plus,<br />

because it is portable, you can test motors all over the<br />

plant—even those in 3 foot crawl spaces and 80 foot<br />

towers—and have all the data in one place.<br />

MCEMAX is an indispensable tool for predictive<br />

maintenance managers. Call for a demonstration<br />

today . . . and start spending your downtime differently!<br />

Revolutionizing Electrical Reliability • (800) 476-6463 • (813) 621-6463 • www.pdma.com<br />

www.PLANTSERVICES.com APRIL 2009 33


0 13 25 48 50 63 75 88 100<br />

% Power (kW)<br />

Note:<br />

Efficiency / Compressors<br />

1. These operating characteristics will vary with motor type,<br />

basic design, motor efficiency, constant or variable speed, etc.<br />

2. Amperage will vary indirectly with changes in rated voltage.<br />

It is best to measure kW directly.<br />

3. 87% amp = 80% power<br />

Input power estimates flow<br />

% kW power<br />

110<br />

100<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

Actual modulation<br />

performace curve<br />

No load<br />

69% power<br />

85% power<br />

35% flow<br />

% Flow<br />

100% load<br />

100% power<br />

Estimated flow = 215 X .35 = 75 acfm<br />

Note: The actual no load modulation point<br />

will vary with each compressor. To establish<br />

actual curve, measure kW at full load at rated<br />

pressure and kW at point where valve closed<br />

before blowdown. Draw appropriate curve.<br />

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100<br />

Figure 3. This modulation performance curve applies to a singlestage,<br />

50-hp class, lubricant-cooled rotary screw compressor with<br />

modulation control.<br />

If greater than 100 hp, use 1.2 times horsepower. Figure 2<br />

shows typical motor performance curves and their relationships<br />

to each other. The specific curves vary by motor type,<br />

but the relationships that apply to a standard 1,800-rpm<br />

induction motor are similar. In our example, the measured<br />

current is 87% of the measured full-load amperage which,<br />

in this case, reflects about 80% of full-load power (kW). The<br />

no-load current is 84% of FLA, which reflects about 60% of<br />

full-load power (kW). This no-load power percent is used to<br />

draw the “power-to-flow curve.”<br />

Proceed as follows to construct the curve.<br />

• Make simultaneous measurements of current and voltage<br />

at full-load and at no-load conditions.<br />

• The no-load current (before blow down) of 102.6 represents<br />

84% of full-load amps and, 69% of full-load power.<br />

• Draw a performance curve with the correct slope<br />

through the no-load point at 69%<br />

• At 80% power, you have 35% flow (75 acfm out of 215 acfm).<br />

This method is relatively accurate and sufficient for making a<br />

reasonable flow estimate. One caveat: Too many times the percent<br />

of full-load amps is used instead of percent of load. If the<br />

87% of full-load amps had been incorrectly interpreted as 87%<br />

power, the estimated flow would have been almost 60% of full<br />

flow, or 129 cfm, a figure that’s almost twice the real value.<br />

Hank van Ormer owns Air Power USA Inc. in Pickerington, Ohio.<br />

Contact him at HankvanOrmer@aol.com and (740) 862-4112.<br />

34 APRIL 2009 www.PLANTSERVICES.com


Properly sealed piping systems are critical<br />

to efficient, sustainable plant operations<br />

BY DAVID BURGESS<br />

Piping is the circulatory system for manufacturing plants,<br />

delivering water, steam, compressed air, lubricants and other<br />

essential fluids where they’re needed. Piping has a direct effect<br />

on sustainability. Today’s piping systems pose challenges that<br />

can’t be met with conventional sealing methods.<br />

Most industrial piping systems have numerous flanged<br />

joints, each one of which can fail, disrupting plant operations<br />

and incurring damage, downtime, lost production<br />

and, in some cases, injury and even death. Flanged joints<br />

typically fail as a result 250 of insufficient cfm out gasket loading. Different<br />

types of gaskets seal 1 gal/CFM best at different loads. For example,<br />

rubber gaskets seal at loads<br />

110 hp<br />

as<br />

compressor<br />

low as 100 psi, whereas spiralwound<br />

and metal-jacketed 500 gal. gaskets storagemight require a minimum<br />

load 500 of cfm 5,000 in psi to seal effectively.<br />

500 cfm<br />

100 psig<br />

Problems arise when service Bleed down conditions = 40 seconds indicate the use of<br />

one type of gasket, but the Net flange demand design = 250 cfm suggests a different<br />

type. Fortunately, there are new gasket materials and configu-<br />

PARETO TELLS ALL<br />

Frequency of failures<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

Reasons for Gasket Failure<br />

Not recommended Lack of load Gasket crushing Other<br />

Figure 1. The causes of gasket leaks vary, but recent analysis of<br />

100 randomly selected, failed gaskets indicated 68 correlated<br />

with insufficient gasket load.<br />

T(decay) = (V)(10) = 66.8 cu ft. or 500 gal. = 11 seconds<br />

WWW.PLANTSERVICES.COM APRIL 2009 35


Reliability / Piping<br />

rations that can reconcile these conflicting Pressure counts<br />

criteria for more sustainable piping systems.<br />

Industry has made great strides in<br />

reducing the number of leaks from<br />

flanged joints, and some plants have even<br />

eliminated them. Because reliable piping<br />

system performance, including pumps,<br />

valves and other equipment, is critical to<br />

plant sustainability both operationally<br />

and environmentally, it’s vital to pay careful<br />

attention to these flanged joints and<br />

the gaskets that keep them from leaking.<br />

Before replacing a leaking gasket, make<br />

sure you’ve identified the root cause of the<br />

leak. A good place to start is to verify that<br />

the proper gasket was installed in the first place based on the<br />

operating parameters of the system, notably temperature, media<br />

and pressure. The first consideration should be temperature<br />

because it can eliminate many unsuitable gasket materials from<br />

consideration. Next, look at the media’s chemical compatibility<br />

with the gasket, including any secondary media to which the<br />

gasket might be exposed, such as fluids that are intermittently<br />

present during chemical or steam/hot-water flushing. Then<br />

consider pressure. Most systems operate at relatively consistent<br />

pressure, but it’s important to take into account severe spikes or<br />

surges that might occur.<br />

However, selecting the right gasket requires an understanding<br />

of the application that goes beyond these criteria.<br />

Flanged joints rarely leak because chemicals attacked the<br />

gasket. Most people understand that gasket materials must<br />

be compatible with system media. Likewise, it’s rare to find a<br />

piping system that exceeds a gasket’s maximum pressure or<br />

temperature ratings.<br />

Figure 2. This compressed sheet gasket<br />

installed in a flat-faced flange failed<br />

because of insufficient compression.<br />

flanges for vacuum service (Figure 2).<br />

The available stress for these types of<br />

flanges varies widely. For example, an<br />

8-in., 150# raised-face flange and a ring<br />

gasket having a contact area of 32.2 sq.<br />

in., a bolt stress of 60,000 psi and a bolt<br />

torque of 200 ft.-lbs. produces 4,800<br />

psi of gasket compression. The same<br />

size flange with a flat face, fitted with<br />

an 80-sq.-in., full-face gasket under the<br />

same bolt stress and torque, results in<br />

gasket stress of only 1,813 psi, about<br />

38% of that from the ring gasket with its<br />

smaller contact area.<br />

As a general rule, therefore, the best<br />

choice for raised-face flanges are ring gaskets made of compressed<br />

sheet, PTFE, graphite or metal. Use full-face rubber<br />

gaskets or gaskets with molded-in sealing rings with greatly<br />

reduced contact area for flat-face flanges.<br />

Valves and pumps with flat flanges and standard ASME<br />

drilling can produce a stress between 1,000 psi and 2,000<br />

psi; glass-lined flanges produce between 2,000 psi and 3,500<br />

psi; flat-faced, non-metallic flanges from 150 psi to 500 psi;<br />

and angle-iron flanges around 100 psi to 300 psi. The bolting<br />

on some flanges used in vacuum service produces almost no<br />

compressive load.<br />

Even within these low-load flanges, there’s considerable<br />

variation in available load. Not all nonmetallic flanges are flat<br />

faced; many have raised ridges to concentrate the load. Some<br />

are stub-end designs in which the contact surface is confined<br />

to within the bolt circle and the bolted flange slips on behind<br />

Technological rescue<br />

Compressive load key to performance<br />

More often than not, flanged joint gasket failures result<br />

from the mechanics of the application, usually from incorrect<br />

compressive load. Eliminating such a simple cause<br />

requires knowing the type of flange in which the gasket will<br />

be installed, including the material and bolting information,<br />

to determine the compressive force. This is extremely important<br />

because nearly 70% of gasket failures are attributable to<br />

insufficient load (Figure 1).<br />

This root cause might be uneven bolt loads, but it’s far<br />

more common that achieving proper loading was impossible<br />

given the flange design and available bolting. Under the<br />

same bolting scheme, a flat-faced flange with a full-face gasket,<br />

for example, won’t apply the same compressive force to<br />

the gasket as a raised-face flange with its smaller compressed<br />

area. Flange types that produce low compressive gasket<br />

loads include flat-faced cast iron flanges commonly found in<br />

valves and pumps, flanges on glass-lined equipment, nonmetallic<br />

flanges, rolled angle-iron flanges for ductwork, and<br />

Figure 3. This gasket’s raised, molded-in rings allow it to seal<br />

with 75% less surface contact. The lower seating stress makes it<br />

suitable for nonmetallic flanges.<br />

36 APRIL 2009 www.PLANTSERVICES.com


Reliability / Piping<br />

the stub-end. These back-up flanges often are metallic and the<br />

stub-end design yields a contact area comparable to that of a<br />

raised-face flange. These assemblies can generate significantly<br />

higher compressive stresses than flat-faced flanges.<br />

Elastomer gaskets might appear to be the obvious solution<br />

to low-load flanges. They’re suitable for some flanges types,<br />

but compressive loads are typically too high when using<br />

glass-lined or stub-end flanges. Moreover, elastomer gaskets<br />

aren’t always compatible with system media. PTFE-based<br />

gaskets provide chemical compatibility, but require higher<br />

loads to seal effectively.<br />

The message is that you should calculate the available<br />

compressive stress for a given flange when selecting a gasket<br />

or troubleshooting a leak. If the available stress falls between<br />

More often than not, flanged joint<br />

gasket failures derive from the<br />

meCHanics of the aPPlication.<br />

600 psi and 1,200 psi, a rubber gasket will work. If the calculated<br />

stress is below 600 psi, you might need special gaskets<br />

to maintain a consistently tight, leak-free seal. By contrast, a<br />

stress greater than 1,200 psi might crush and split a rubber<br />

gasket, but still might be too low to produce an effective seal<br />

with harder materials, such as rubber-bound fiber sheet gaskets<br />

or standard PTFE-type materials. These materials work<br />

best at stresses of 3,000 psi or more.<br />

Gasketing for low-load flanges<br />

For extremely low-load flanges, consider rubber-based<br />

gaskets with molded ridges that concentrate the compressive<br />

load (Figure 3). These gaskets often seal where standard rubber<br />

sheet gaskets leak. They achieve a tight<br />

seal more easily because the ridges contact<br />

the flanges first. As more compressive load<br />

is applied, larger areas of the flange come<br />

in contact with the gasket, preventing<br />

it from being crushed, even though the<br />

initial contact area is limited.<br />

These gaskets can be beefed up with<br />

metal backing rings that slip behind the<br />

flanges to provide more joint strength.<br />

The rings permit greater bolt torque that<br />

produces a significantly larger pressure<br />

capability. These bolted joints can survive<br />

pressures that nearly equal the burst pressures<br />

of the piping.<br />

There are many soft, highly compressible<br />

PTFE-based gaskets that collapse to 20% to<br />

40% of their original thickness. This, technically,<br />

makes these materials softer than<br />

Water power<br />

TOPIC<br />

Gasket tutorial<br />

Figure 4. This gasket reacts with water or<br />

oil to generate its own load, eliminating<br />

leaks in low-load applications.<br />

more resources at www.plantservices.com<br />

Joint sealants<br />

searCH<br />

“Rethinking the purchase of valves<br />

and valve repairs”<br />

“Joint sealants to the rescue”<br />

For more, search www.<strong>Plant</strong><strong>Services</strong>.com using the<br />

keywords flange, gasket and load.<br />

some rubber gaskets, but they still require minimum compressive<br />

stress to seal the leak paths through the gasket body. Some<br />

flange types noted above can produce sufficient compression<br />

on these gaskets, but others, especially non-metallic flat-faced<br />

flanges, might not consistently seal using these gaskets.<br />

One possible alternative is an elastomer gasket with a<br />

PTFE envelope that wraps around the inside diameter and<br />

a portion of the gasket face. The envelope can be affixed to<br />

the rubber with an adhesive or bonded to the rubber during<br />

vulcanization.<br />

Another solution to a low-load situation is a gasket that<br />

swells in the contained liquid (Figure 4). These gaskets<br />

typically are of the fiber variety, and are less compressible<br />

than rubber gaskets. The advantage of a fiber gasket is that it<br />

handles low loads and withstands stresses that would crush<br />

a rubber gasket. A secondary advantage is the availability of<br />

sheet sizes to 150 in. square, making it possible to use a onepiece<br />

gasket in very large flanges.<br />

Another advantage of fiber-based gasket material with<br />

swelling characteristics is its ability to be used with flatfaced<br />

flanges when the operating pressure or, in some cases,<br />

the test pressure, is too high for a rubber gasket. The higher<br />

pressure rating of the fiber gasket allows the joint to function<br />

reliably at elevated pressures, while the swelling seals<br />

the flat-faced flanges.<br />

Compressive load has an enormous<br />

effect on the performance of gasketed<br />

joints in industrial piping systems.<br />

Available bolt loading is a critical factor<br />

in determining the type of gaskets<br />

to be used. Many types of gasket material<br />

and designs are available to meet<br />

the challenges posed by various flange<br />

configurations. Keeping your gasket<br />

supplier involved in the selection and<br />

replacement process will help your<br />

plant’s piping systems perform reliably,<br />

efficiently and sustainably.<br />

David Burgess is senior applications engineer<br />

for Garlock Sealing Technologies, Palmyra,<br />

N.Y. Contact him at dave.burgess@<br />

garlock.com and (315) 597-4811.<br />

www.PLANTSERVICES.com APRIL 2009 37


By Terry McMahon,<br />

Steve Walton and Jim Tatera<br />

Despite<br />

computerization,<br />

skills are still<br />

needed to achieve<br />

the full benefits<br />

Analytical instruments used for online chemical<br />

analysis of process streams or plant environments are generally<br />

called process analyzers. On-stream analytical data<br />

have proven to be crucial to safe and efficient operation in<br />

the petroleum, chemical, pharmaceutical, pulp and paper,<br />

power and other industries. Historically speaking, these instruments<br />

have been complex, even temperamental, systems<br />

with relatively unique operational and maintenance needs.<br />

If online instrumentation, sample-handling systems and<br />

data-analysis software are to realize optimum performance,<br />

they will require continual attention from the analyzer support<br />

staff.<br />

Increasingly, however, regulatory and high-priority<br />

economic concerns such as operator health and safety,<br />

emissions control and energy conservation are raising the<br />

importance of analyzer reliability to normal operations.<br />

Particularly with respect to regulatory and safety uses, the<br />

time logged as out-of-limits because of an analyzer outage<br />

can result in stiff fines.<br />

In these situations, it’s important to be able to deal with<br />

routine maintenance needs, as well as to recognize and<br />

characterize maintenance needs that require more specialized<br />

skills. Sourcing such specialized skills and an expedited response<br />

to an incident frequently become high-priority items.<br />

Looking back<br />

A brief overview of analyzer history can put the current situation<br />

into perspective. The technology for on-stream chemical<br />

analysis dates back about 70 years. The first nondispersive<br />

infrared (NDIR) photometers were developed and deployed<br />

in the late 1930s at the Ludwigshafen Research Lab of I.G.<br />

Farbenindustrie (German Chemical Trust later broken up by<br />

the Allied Occupation Forces into BASF, Bayer and Hoechst).<br />

A schematic of UltraRotAbsorptionSchreiber (URAS), the<br />

first on-stream analyzer, is shown in Figure 1. The URAS<br />

trade name belongs to the original manufacturer, Hartmann<br />

& Braun, which is now a unit of ABB, a leading worldwide<br />

analyzer supplier. When this work was discovered, its significance<br />

was recognized immediately (British Intelligence<br />

Operations Subcommittee Report #1007, 12 June 1946). The<br />

report states that “I.G. Farbenindustrie’s development in recent<br />

years of the infrared absorption meter and the magnetic<br />

oxygen recorder represent a great advance.”<br />

U.S. chemical and petroleum companies began using onstream<br />

analyzers in the 1950s. By 1960, Standard Oil of New<br />

Jersey’s (later Exxon) Baton Rouge Refinery had a significant<br />

complement of on-stream analyzers (Table 1).<br />

The emergence of real-time digital computers in the<br />

1960s, followed by the microelectronics revolution and the<br />

38 APRIL 2009 www.PLANTSERVICES.com


SKILLS / INSTRUMENTS AND CONTROLS<br />

ANALYZER COSTS AND S<strong>UP</strong>PLIERS (CIRCA 1960)<br />

Analyzer<br />

Installed<br />

Cost ($M)<br />

Suppliers<br />

Gas chromatograph 10 to 15 Beckman, Consolidated Electrodynamics, Greenbrier, Perkin Elme<br />

Colorimeter 8 Beckman<br />

Densitometer 8 Precision Thermometer & Instrument<br />

Final boiling point 9 Hallikainen, Precision Scientific, Technical Oil Tool Co. (TOTCO)<br />

Flash point 10 Precision Scientific<br />

Hydrogen sulfide (Pb acet tape) 11 Minneapolis Honeywell Rubicon<br />

Ionization chamber (ppb gases) 10 Mine Safety Appliances<br />

Initial boiling point 5 to 8 Hallikainen, TOTCO<br />

Infrared (NDIR) 8 to 12 Beckman, Liston-Becker, Mine Safety Appliances<br />

Moisture (electrolytic) 7 Beckman, Consolidated Electrodynamics, Mfrs Engineering and Equipment<br />

Moisture (heat of adsorption) 14 Mine Safety Appliances<br />

Differential refractometer 6 to 12 Consolidated Electrodynamics, Greenbrier<br />

Reid vapor pressure (RVP) 7 Precision Scientific<br />

Viscometer 8 Hallikainen<br />

Ultraviolet 10 Analytic Systems Co.<br />

large-scale integration microprocessor in the 1970s, eventually<br />

allowed exploitation of highly sophisticated analytical<br />

techniques for on-line analysis. These developments required<br />

several decades to develop. During the past 10 years<br />

or so, the full power of on-stream chemical analysis, combined<br />

with modern information technology, has taken hold<br />

throughout the process industries and is generating higher<br />

productivities, yields, efficiencies and product quality.<br />

Realizing these benefits required highly skilled and<br />

experienced technical personnel. The analyzer community<br />

evolved into a culture suited to the care and tending of these<br />

useful industrial analyzer tools. The question facing plant<br />

operations management is: How do you realize the enormous<br />

potential benefits of on-stream analysis without the<br />

overhead of on-site analyzer specialists<br />

In the beginning, the computer was a highly specialized<br />

tool surrounded by a cadre of expert-practitioners. During<br />

the late 1950s, mere mortals never were allowed to approach<br />

the computational machines. The high priests who tended<br />

the main console, changed magnetic tape drives and otherwise<br />

managed the care and feeding of the electronic monster<br />

were the only humans allowed to have access to the air-conditioned<br />

inner sanctum. These operators accepted your deck<br />

of punched cards and, a day later, handed you a printout of<br />

your results or, more frequently, a memory-dump to help<br />

you with your program fault analysis. What happened between<br />

your two visits was known only to the Most High.<br />

Ultimately, Microsoft and Intel turned Everyman into a<br />

high priest, but with a big difference. Today’s user needs to<br />

FIRST OF ITS KIND<br />

Figure 1. This block diagram shows the major components and<br />

configuration of the first on-stream analyzer.<br />

WWW.PLANTSERVICES.COM APRIL 2009 39


Lutz Modular Flow<br />

Control System<br />

Whether you need to keep track<br />

of total chemical dispensed,<br />

or need an automatic<br />

Batch System. Lutz offers<br />

the right solution<br />

for your application.<br />

Please contact us for more information.<br />

TS-Series:<br />

For total or batching<br />

Economy<br />

TR-Series<br />

Lutz Pumps, Inc.<br />

1160 Beaver Ruin Road · Norcross, GA 30093-4898<br />

Phone: (770) 925-1222 · Tollfree: (800) 843-3901 · Fax: (770) 923-0334<br />

w w w . l u t z p u m p s . c o m · e - M a i l : i n f o @ l u t z p u m p s . c o m<br />

“The Safety Gate Company”<br />

www.safetygate.com/od • 1-800-962-6111<br />

know very little about hard-core programming. The large<br />

software producers already have done it. Save for a very few<br />

exceptions, computer specialists rely on preprogrammed<br />

software tools that come with the operating system.<br />

A big part of the challenge in early programming was trying<br />

to solve complex problems involving large data sets using<br />

machines that had tiny memories (2K to 32K). In today’s<br />

world of gigabytes, this challenge is a quaint recollection of<br />

only those who lived through it.<br />

A digital parallel<br />

Analyzers are now at a somewhat similar juncture. <strong>Plant</strong><br />

operators need the data analyzers provide, but often can’t<br />

afford to dedicate a highly skilled individual to provide it.<br />

The big questions are these: Are analyzers ready to cut<br />

the cord and fly without a lifeline What steps should plant<br />

operations take to realize the benefits of analyzer-derived<br />

data while ensuring that the data flow maintains a high level<br />

of reliability<br />

Paul Pulicken is in charge of analyzer technology at BP’s<br />

Texas City Refinery as well as working with others in this<br />

technology at the company’s five U.S. refineries. With 23<br />

years of analyzer experience in a variety of petroleum and<br />

chemical processes, Pulicken is well positioned to offer<br />

direction in this field.<br />

The Texas City Refinery, with roughly 1,500 analyzers, isn’t<br />

your typical manufacturing operation. Servicing these instruments<br />

with a staff of fewer than 40 people, however, is every<br />

maintenance manager’s analyzer challenge – in spades.<br />

The No. 1 challenge, his experience shows, has been presenting<br />

a representative sample to the analyzer. This is a problem<br />

not only in the sample system’s fundamental design, but<br />

also in its continuing maintenance. Much effort is currently<br />

directed at standardizing and rationalizing sample system design<br />

and component interfacing, and assuring integrated data<br />

flow for sample-system troubleshooting and optimization.<br />

Traditionally, this activity has been long on experience and<br />

Resources for continuing education<br />

The typical training courses Technical Automation<br />

<strong>Services</strong> Corp. (TASC, www.tascorp.com) conducts<br />

include advanced topics in gas chromatography, basic<br />

industrial chemistry, improving sample system reliability,<br />

insight into continuous emission monitoring, introduction<br />

to process gas chromatography, and troubleshooting<br />

sample systems. Other analyzer specialists offer<br />

similar programs, and analyzer manufacturers offer<br />

extensive training on their products. Other professional<br />

training sources include ISA’s Analysis Division<br />

(www.isa.org/ad), the International Forum on Process<br />

Analytical Chemistry (www.ifpac.com) and the Center<br />

for Professional Development (www.cfpd.com).<br />

40 APRIL 2009 www.PLANTSERVICES.com


SkILLS / Instruments and Controls<br />

ad hoc decision-making, which leaves operating management<br />

vulnerable to key personnel reassignments.<br />

Challenge No. 2 is the shortage of qualified project engineers<br />

and managers who have sufficient experience with modern<br />

analyzers. This situation often shortchanges the analyzer’s<br />

value as a provider of key process performance measures.<br />

The third challenge is the lack of analyzer knowledge<br />

at the plant operations level. This translates to less-thanoptimum<br />

use of analyzer data, as well as slower response to<br />

impending maintenance issues. The three chief challenges<br />

don’t even mention instrument problems.<br />

In Pulicken’s view, education and training are the major<br />

needs. For instrument training, particularly with a new or<br />

520 South Front Street<br />

advancing technology,<br />

Philadelphia,<br />

he<br />

PA<br />

relies<br />

19147on the instrument manufacturer.<br />

For United more States system-level of America training, particularly with<br />

multiple vendors<br />

215-440-9800<br />

involved, he generally opts for training<br />

courses from analyzer systems engineering firms.<br />

According to a recent worldwide process analyzer market<br />

study (PAI/2008), the process analyzer enterprise (annual<br />

expenditures for instruments, sample systems, installation/<br />

commissioning and maintenance) was almost $7 billion<br />

in 2008. The current economic malaise is likely to defer<br />

some, perhaps many, capital projects and cause substantial<br />

more resources at www.plantservices.com<br />

TOPIC<br />

SEARCH<br />

Process control “Fuzzy logic”<br />

Condition monitoring “The power of decentralization”<br />

System flaws<br />

“Outwit control system gremlins”<br />

Redundancy<br />

“How to validate critical controls”<br />

I&C options<br />

“Engineer a flexible facility”<br />

Modern instruments<br />

Client Name _________________________________<br />

SKF_Reliability<br />

“Smarter PdM”<br />

Proof Date______________________<br />

HB&M Job #_________________________________<br />

8108025<br />

2/19/09<br />

For more, search www.<strong>Plant</strong><strong>Services</strong>.com using the<br />

Proof Time______________________<br />

Job Description ______________________________<br />

Baker Ad<br />

11:00<br />

keywords analyzer, HART and fieldbus.<br />

Proof # _________________________<br />

Publication Name ____________________________<br />

<strong>Plant</strong> <strong>Services</strong><br />

AE Approval ____________________<br />

Insertion Date _______________________________<br />

March 09<br />

Size ________________________________________<br />

Half Page horiz<br />

HB&M Ad #____________________________________<br />

Client bought space<br />

reductions in analyzer-related Art Dept Approval________________ spending, but it’s unlikely to<br />

seriously reduce the value of the analyzer enterprise. This<br />

technology is now a deeply embedded, integral part of the<br />

safe and efficient operation of much of the world’s production<br />

capacity.<br />

Terry McMahon, Steve Walton and Jim Tatera are principals at PAI<br />

Partners, Leonia, N.J. E-mail them at mcmahontec135@aol.com,<br />

swalton208@cs.com and jtatera@seidata.com.<br />

SKF and Baker Instrument<br />

Sharing knowledge to save you time, money and energy.<br />

It’s not if an electric motor will fail, it’s when.<br />

At Baker Instrument, understanding why motors<br />

fail is fundamental.<br />

Now that Baker is part of SKF, you can benefi t from<br />

an unrivalled combination of knowledge, predictive<br />

maintenance technologies and asset management<br />

expertise – all from the same company.<br />

To learn more about how SKF and Baker Instrument<br />

can help maintain your assets and improve your<br />

bottom line, talk to your SKF/Baker representative<br />

or visit us at www.bakerinst.com.<br />

www.PLANTSERVICES.com APRIL 2009 41


web hunter<br />

russ Kratowicz, P.E., CMRP<br />

Barter If You Don’t Have Cash<br />

A time-honored way to get what you need despite budget cuts<br />

Most manufacturing plants already have put their<br />

corporate spendthrifts on short leashes. When economic<br />

pessimism rules the day, maintenance spending has a nasty<br />

way of dropping to zero while the need for tools and parts<br />

continues on, heedless of the economic punditry on the telly.<br />

For centuries, mankind has exchanged goods and services<br />

in the absence of cash, credit, banks and the other institutions<br />

we now think are so necessary in the real world. We’ve<br />

lost our ability to haggle in an uncertain, unstructured<br />

marketplace. That uncertainty becomes the launching point<br />

The value applied to sometHIng used<br />

for barter can sHIft an econoMIC<br />

burden to one party or the other.<br />

for this opportunity to root around in the chaos we call the<br />

Internet in search of some credible, practical, zero-cost,<br />

noncommercial, registration-free resources that can shed<br />

some light on barter and trade for the industrial world.<br />

Remember, we search the Web so you don’t have to.<br />

Getting started<br />

Cashless transaction have three main variants and quite a<br />

few benefits accrue to a company from using them. So says<br />

Nigel M. Healey in his article titled “Why is corporate barter”<br />

Pay a visit to http://findarticles.com, where you’ll see<br />

“Find Articles in:” and select “Business.” Browse the publications<br />

in alphabetical order, and you should select the letter B<br />

to zero in on a publication called Business Economics. Scroll<br />

to the lower part of the page, click on April 1996, and read<br />

this eight-page article (including three pages of footnotes<br />

and references) to learn about the variants, the benefits<br />

derived from engaging in industrial barter and an analysis<br />

of the domestic barter industry. The article examines a selection<br />

of barter-related material published since 1974.<br />

Case stuDIes<br />

The typical warehouse holds much excess unsold inventory,<br />

each item of which represents cash that should be deployed<br />

in far more productive ways. Companies that have found<br />

themselves in this situation include MTD Products Inc.,<br />

AT&T, Konica U.S.A. and Heineken U.S.A. Inc. It was a barter<br />

arrangement that helped each of these companies liquidate<br />

inventory. Maybe you could ease your budget crunch by doing<br />

the same thing. All that’s needed to get moving might be some<br />

case studies, in which case you should open your book to www.<br />

industryweek.com and access the drop-down menu at the top<br />

right corner under the word magazine. The past issue you want<br />

is dated May 18, 1998, and the article you want is titled “Corporate<br />

Barter: Out Of the Dark” In it, Karen M. Kroll shows<br />

you how these companies disposed of lawn mowers, sunglasses,<br />

handheld consumer products and, amazingly, office space.<br />

Now, you can go forth and be the financial hero of the moment.<br />

Money source<br />

In the beginning, there was barter. The ancients had unmet<br />

needs, but no way to print greenbacks. They had no choice<br />

but to use other items as a medium of exchange. Ultimately,<br />

beads and trinkets were abandoned in favor of coins. That<br />

scenario appears to be a point of contention between Nick<br />

Szabo and Mencius Moldbug, a pair of bloggers, the former<br />

at George Washington University and the latter being a<br />

pseudonym. When you have enough time on your hands,<br />

get a sense of the give and take between the two by reading<br />

Szabo’s “Logical emergence of money from barter,”<br />

and the subsequent online debate at http://unenumerated.<br />

blogspot.com. Scroll down to the archives in the right-hand<br />

column and select the March 2008 issue. When that loads,<br />

drop down to the March 5 entry (they’re listed in reverse<br />

chronological order) and click on “Links to this post” found<br />

just below the last line of the posting. That will get you the<br />

original essay and the comments from both parties.<br />

EverYBoDY’s doin’ it<br />

If your company isn’t investigating the barter concept, you<br />

folks might be missing out on something good. But, don’t<br />

take my word for it. The skeptics out there in readerland<br />

might have an interest in the next Web site. It presents the<br />

basic idea of how barter exchanges operate and highlights<br />

their dollar volume trends. Toss your mouse at http://news.<br />

thomasnet.com and enter the word “bartering” in the search<br />

feature at the upper right corner. You’ll want to select the<br />

article titled “Small Biz Owners Revisiting Age-old Tradition:<br />

Bartering,” by Jorina Fontelera. It’s a link-rich page that<br />

will take you many interesting places.<br />

42 APRIL 2009 www.PLANTSERVICES.com


For the Pacific Northwest<br />

Martin Kagan runs The Capital Asset Exchange Ltd., Beaverton,<br />

Ore., which seeks to be a forum and trading center<br />

for its members. The organization established the Oregon<br />

Trade Expansion Network (OTEN) to act as a clearinghouse<br />

for barter transactions among members. Of course, there’s<br />

a Web site associated with both and I’d like to direct your<br />

attention to a specific page. Head over to www.capex.com to<br />

access the link that takes you to OTEN. Find the link to an<br />

article titled “Trade Economics 101.” Kagan says that it will<br />

help determine whether barter can give you a competitive<br />

advantage in terms of getting new business, selling surplus,<br />

conserving cash or alternative financing. Kagan’s prose is a<br />

bit too abstract for my tastes and the graph that’s supposed<br />

to be on the page is missing, but there’s a message here that<br />

might prove to be of value to your real-world problems.<br />

Funky markets and pricing<br />

Money is a true, indifferent medium of exchange. Going<br />

outside the money economy obscures the value of commodities.<br />

The effect is especially pronounced when extramarket<br />

trading gets regionalized. Fragmented markets make it difficult<br />

to price offerings properly These arguments come from<br />

Gregg Economou, senior systems programmer at Carnegie<br />

Mellon University, who uses the nickname isildur, one of<br />

Tolkien´s characters. The rest of his musings are available for<br />

public inspection at www.vaxpower.org/~isildur, where you<br />

should scroll to the bottom of the page for the link to the<br />

article titled “Towards the new barter economy.”<br />

Worst practices<br />

The Soviet Union disappeared in a puff of smoke because,<br />

among other things, its command-and-control economy<br />

didn’t work very well when the rest of the world was<br />

booming. The profit motive was absent, and greenbacks,<br />

or whatever they call their ruble equivalent, were in short<br />

supply. What’s a good Soviet citizen to do The same thing<br />

that we might be forced to do: Use nonmonetary transactions.<br />

Before you join that game, learn from history to avoid<br />

making the same mistakes as our comrades. To make that<br />

possible, I direct your digital attention to “Explaining rise of<br />

barter in Russia: Virtual Economy vs. Monetary Issues,” an<br />

April 2004, master of science research paper written by Tuvshintulga<br />

Bold at East Carolina University. It examines the<br />

two main schools of thought concerning the collapse of that<br />

economy. It shows how the value applied to something used<br />

for barter can shift an economic burden to one party or the<br />

other. Before you barter, learn how this happens at www.ecu.<br />

edu, where your commissar orders you to enter the author’s<br />

first name in the search box to access the 25-page document.<br />

more resources at www.plantservices.com<br />

TOPic<br />

Online auctions<br />

Entrepreneurialism<br />

Green overview<br />

Industrial recycling<br />

Used equipment<br />

Domestic barter<br />

According to the next Web citation, from the historical<br />

perspective, barter is inefficient because it’s a response<br />

to, and not a remedy for, market adversities and uncertainties.<br />

In her 2003 paper, “U.S. Domestic Barter: An<br />

Empirical Investigation,” Barbara Cresti at the Université<br />

Catholique de Louvain in Belgium explores the the North<br />

American barter industry that came into being during the<br />

1950s. She points out the difference between corporate<br />

and retail barter. You’ll learn how our robust financial<br />

infrastructure explains why barter works here and how its<br />

lack indirectly led to the collapse of the Russian economy.<br />

This scholarly work is at www.uclouvain.be/en-econ.html.<br />

Click “Publications” on the left. Then, click on “Discussion<br />

Papers” and select the “ECON DP 2003” option, also on<br />

the left. Scroll down to select the entry listed as “2003/36”<br />

to read the full report.<br />

Reduce the national deficit<br />

Those who enter the bartering arena can find some deals<br />

that make good economic sense. But you’ll need to keep<br />

track of the details so you can pay taxes on whatever results<br />

when the dust settles on your exchange and, thus, help us<br />

get through this financial downturn. Learn your reporting<br />

obligations by visiting our hired hands working in Washington’s<br />

Internal Revenue Service at www.irs.gov and performing<br />

a search on the word “bartering.” When I searched the<br />

IRS site, I found nearly 300 Web pages that have something<br />

to say about your cashless swap. Maybe you better get your<br />

CFO involved in this matter.<br />

Without comment<br />

www.greatoffers4u.com/articles/3823<br />

www.barter.net<br />

search<br />

“Gatherers versus hunters”<br />

“Don’t quit your day job”<br />

“Growing green plants”<br />

“Second time around”<br />

“More than one kind of green”<br />

For more, search www.<strong>Plant</strong><strong>Services</strong>.com using the<br />

keywords green, exchange and trade.<br />

E-mail Executive Editor Russ Kratowicz, P.E., CMRP, at russk@<br />

putman.net.<br />

www.PLANTSERVICES.com APRIL 2009 43


in the trenches<br />

Insured to the Hilt<br />

Acme attempts to save money by modifying its pension plan<br />

Being an integral part of the macroeconomy, Acme<br />

wasn’t immune to the general deterioration of the market’s<br />

ability to keep every company afloat. The demand for Acme<br />

products had been plunging to levels the company last experienced<br />

during the early 1950s, when it was founded. Upper<br />

management knew that Acme was never going to qualify for<br />

a government bailout, subsidy or stimulus of any sort. Consequently,<br />

top management actually felt guilty about having<br />

to accept its traditional multimillion-dollar yearend bonus.<br />

What seemed to be dragging down the Acme profitability<br />

picture were the obligations surrounding the looming<br />

payments soon to come due on the pension plan. Seeking<br />

to be viewed as a credible company, Acme established a<br />

defined-benefit pension plan soon after its earliest operations<br />

achieved profitability.<br />

The benefits an employee would receive under this pension<br />

plan were a function of an employee’s total years of<br />

unbroken service and the final average salary during the last<br />

calendar quarter of work. This benefit was, in great measure,<br />

responsible for the long-term job loyalty exhibited by Acme<br />

employees.<br />

Now, however, under financial pressure, Acme’s management<br />

decided that pension plans are passé and most<br />

impractical in this day and age. Like so many companies<br />

In a normal economy, the value of<br />

employee loyalty would be difficult<br />

to quantify.<br />

before them, Acme sought to move to a defined-contribution<br />

retirement plan. Acme’s plan provided a pension payment<br />

that was a function of the number of “credits” an employee<br />

garnered during many years of service. The credits were<br />

granted quarterly and were a function of a percentage of the<br />

employee’s current salary and the current yield on a U.S.<br />

Treasury Bond.<br />

In deference to its long-term employees, Acme didn’t want<br />

to make this change suddenly and scare off the knowledgeable<br />

workers who were keeping things afloat. Instead, the<br />

company declared a five-year transition period. During<br />

this time window, employees accrued benefits under both<br />

approaches. Those who retired during the five-year window<br />

selected whichever plan was most beneficial to them once<br />

they left the company. Those who retired after the transition<br />

period could still select either plan, but the benefits accrued<br />

under the old plan were frozen when the window closed.<br />

One would think that people whose jobs are somewhat<br />

insecure would be grateful to have a paycheck and be accepting<br />

of change - but not this time. The pension situation was<br />

the source of great and vocal dissatisfaction among Acme<br />

workers, most of whom had been with the company for<br />

many years. Penny Black, the very first Acme employee, was<br />

most outraged. She argued that Acme’s new pension plan<br />

discriminated against older employees by setting the employee’s<br />

initial account cash balances far below the equivalent<br />

value of any pension annuities that would result from<br />

the old plan. In her view, this was an age-discrimination<br />

issue. She convinced several 40-year-old current and former<br />

Acme employees who participated in the pension plan after<br />

the transition period expired to join her in a class-action suit<br />

alleging age discrimination on Acme’s part.<br />

How could this situation have been avoided Do definedbenefit<br />

pension plans have a future in this economy What<br />

is the best way for an employer to get out from under heavy<br />

pension obligations Are employees better off using their own<br />

privatelyfunded plans that are independent of the employer<br />

Can employers make unilateral changes to an existing, longstanding<br />

pension plan How can a company estimate the cost<br />

of a change in loss of employee goodwill and loyalty<br />

<strong>Plant</strong> <strong>Services</strong> is searching for a plant professional to join<br />

44 APRIL 2009 www.PLANTSERVICES.com


our group of experts and provide an “In the Trenches” guest<br />

response. Put your thoughts in front of your magazine-reading<br />

peers and online readers. For further information, contact<br />

Executive Editor Russ Kratowicz at russk@putman.net or<br />

(630) 467-1301 x 309.<br />

An attorney says:<br />

Acme isn’t alone in moving from a defined benefit pension<br />

plan to a defined contribution plan. Many employers have<br />

made this change in recent years.<br />

The best way to make such a change, to disadvantage as<br />

few employees as possible, is to review various scenarios<br />

and build the new plan so that it adversely affects as few<br />

long-term employees who are close to retirement as possible.<br />

Those who have been with the company for a few years<br />

might not remain, and younger employees have far more<br />

years to accumulate contributions under the new retirement<br />

plan. As a result, they would feel the effects much less.<br />

Once the new plan has been properly developed, the key<br />

is good employee communications. Had Acme thoughtfully<br />

developed its defined contribution plan and explained to<br />

employees, especially older ones, such as Penny Black, that<br />

the change would minimally affect them, it would have had<br />

far fewer problems.<br />

In a normal economy, the value of employee loyalty would be<br />

difficult to quantify. But in the current economic drought, for<br />

every employee who quits there are probably 10 unemployed<br />

workers standing in line to apply for the job. Rather than a loss<br />

of employee goodwill and loyalty, the cost of a law suit remains<br />

a heftier threat to an employer today, especially one that<br />

struggles to stay afloat in these perilous times.<br />

As usual, Acme has acted too quickly and with not<br />

enough planning and foresight. Both the company and its<br />

workers likely will suffer the effects of a poorly planned<br />

change.<br />

Julie Badel, partner<br />

Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.<br />

(312) 499-1418<br />

jbadel@ebglaw.com<br />

A maintenance planner says:<br />

In my opinion, a class-action law suit based on age discrimination<br />

by Acme has no basis here. Acme offered two choices<br />

of retirement plans for the older employees during the<br />

five-year transition period, which seemed to be a generous<br />

offer on the part of the company. If anything, the younger<br />

employees should have an issue with not having a choice of<br />

plans when they reach retirement age. Defined-benefit pension<br />

plans can be a drain on a company’s balance sheet, and<br />

might not have a place in the economy of today.<br />

Could this situation have been avoided Yes. Treat each<br />

employee, regardless of years of service, on an equal basis.<br />

Acme could have set a definite date for the pension plan to<br />

be terminated, vested all employees, and then paid out the<br />

retirement funds they had accrued based on the calculation<br />

contained in the plan. These funds could then have been<br />

rolled into a 401(k), IRA or similar plan. It’s not an ideal<br />

situation for those close to retirement, but it would provide<br />

a substantial lump sum to the older employees to fund one<br />

<strong>UP</strong>Per manAGement should forego<br />

some, or all, of their year-end<br />

bonuses in an eFFort to shore up<br />

the shaky financial sitUAtion.<br />

of these retirement options. In addition, upper management<br />

should forego some, or all, of their year-end bonuses in an<br />

effort to shore up the shaky financial situation and to show<br />

the employees evidence of management’s commitment to<br />

them and to the company.<br />

These changes definitely would have an effect on employees’<br />

morale and their confidence in the company’s<br />

future. Acme’s management would need to be proactive<br />

and communicate to employees. Workers want to know the<br />

status of the company and the reasons for the change to the<br />

retirement plan from the beginning. Workers want to see<br />

a commitment to keeping the company viable. In addition,<br />

the company might offer some incentives such as 401(k)<br />

matching funds and awards for years of service as a way to<br />

retain valuable employees. Ideally, the employees would step<br />

up and support these measures and the situation wouldn’t<br />

deteriorate into an “us-versus-them” situation, which could<br />

result from less-than-clear communication.<br />

Acme’s biggest mistake in this situation was offering the<br />

five-year transition period, which allowed its obligations to<br />

multiply exponentially each year. Acme’s financial obligation<br />

to the pension plan would be better addressed early<br />

while the company had the means to fully fund the plan<br />

instead of waiting five years while hoping the company’s<br />

financial situation improves. Defined-benefit pension plans<br />

are much harder to keep funded, with even the largest<br />

organizations grappling for the means to fund their evergrowing<br />

responsibilities to the plans.<br />

Bryan G. Trantham, maintenance planner<br />

Evergreen Packaging-Waynesville Facility<br />

(828) 646-2140<br />

tranthb@blueridgepaper.com<br />

www.PLANTSERVICES.com APRIL 2009 45


IN THE TRENCHES<br />

Quality Training Materials<br />

from American Tech<br />

American Tech’s line of<br />

comprehensive books and<br />

reference materials are<br />

suitable for novices as well<br />

as seasoned professionals.<br />

Many of our textbooks<br />

highlight safety procedures<br />

and techniques as they<br />

relate to OSHA and NFPA<br />

70E requirements.<br />

Build confidence with a<br />

wide range of job-related<br />

skills, from electrical and<br />

maintenance to metals and<br />

boilers.<br />

Contact us today to receive<br />

our new 2009 Spring catalog.<br />

AN ACADEMICIAN SAYS:<br />

Employees usually like defined-benefit pension plans because<br />

of the fixed monthly payments for the rest of their lives, regardless<br />

of what the stock market does. If the market is going down,<br />

down and down, as it is now, and pension fund assets are going<br />

down with the market, it has no effect on the retired person<br />

with a fixed-benefit plan: The check will always be there. This<br />

gives retirees a great sense of security.<br />

However, the defined-benefit plan isn’t such a great deal<br />

for the employer. These plans are the most costly to operate,<br />

and they’re administratively complex. Moreover, the company<br />

has an obligation to make a fixed monthly payment to<br />

its retirees, even under the current conditions in which sales<br />

and profits are declining rapidly, and the assets supporting<br />

the pension payments (usually stocks) have dramatically<br />

declined in value. This puts a severe strain on the company.<br />

These concerns are why fixed-benefit plans are on the decline,<br />

and although I’m not an expert in this area, I don’t see<br />

much of a future for plans of this type. Although it sounded<br />

like a great idea for motivating and building loyalty among<br />

employees (however, I haven’t seen any data that support<br />

this assumption), it hasn’t been so good for the employer.<br />

Obviously, Acme realized the problems with the fixed<br />

plans, and now is trying to reduce its pension commitments.<br />

Acme isn’t alone in this effort. For example, witness the<br />

restructuring plans of the American auto industry. Based on<br />

a 2006 study, it costs almost $2,400 more to manufacture an<br />

American-make of car than producing a comparable Toyota<br />

or Honda (manufactured in the United States). Probably<br />

close to half of this is in salary and benefit costs. It’s tough to<br />

compete when you start with a $2,400 disadvantage. So, the<br />

big pensions and lifetime health-care benefits probably will<br />

be one of the first costs to be trimmed dramatically in the<br />

auto industry restructuring.<br />

How to change the pension plan without destroying employee<br />

morale and loyalty is the big question. Some “change<br />

experts” recommend one stroke of the sword and suffer<br />

about three months of anger, but after that, things gradually<br />

will get back to normal. Others (including me) recommend<br />

the Acme approach in which people are given options and<br />

a five-year transition period. Usually the young employees<br />

don’t care – their energy is directed toward paying the mortgage.<br />

It’s the older employees, like Penny, who are nearing<br />

retirement and who are the most interested and affected.<br />

And here, Acme is simply going to have to take its lumps,<br />

I’m afraid.<br />

Professor Homer H. Johnson, Ph.D.<br />

Loyola University Chicago<br />

(312) 915-6682<br />

hjohnso@luc.edu<br />

46 APRIL 2009 WWW.PLANTSERVICES.COM


product picks<br />

Stainless solenoid<br />

valves sized up<br />

Now available in a 3-in. size,<br />

stainless steel solenoid valves<br />

are full port, require no differential<br />

pressure to open and are easily<br />

serviced while in the pipeline.<br />

Applications include deionized water, ammonia, vegetable oil,<br />

fuel oil, gas, steam, solvents, cryogenics and oxygen. The valves<br />

have a packless construction with continuous-duty coils for AC<br />

and DC voltages, available normally open or normally closed<br />

with 150-lb. and 300-lb. flanged connections.<br />

Magnatrol Valve Corp.<br />

(973) 427-4341 / www.magnatrol.com/valveselect.html<br />

Eliminate unsafe bolting methods<br />

Patented Multi-Jackbolt Tensioners improve safety and eliminate<br />

time-consuming bolting methods because only hand/<br />

air tools are required to install or remove any size tensioner.<br />

They retrofit existing nuts, bolts or studs, and are accurate<br />

and reusable. A variety of bolting products are available to<br />

meet challenging applications.<br />

Superbolt<br />

(800) 345-bolt / www.superbolt.com/index-plantservices.html<br />

Energy Management Software<br />

IndustrialIT cpmPlus Energy Manager software helps to monitor,<br />

manage and optimize energy usage. It produces accurate<br />

energy-demand plans a day ahead for energy-supply planning<br />

and optimization. Reporting and analysis tools evaluate energy<br />

use patterns and pinpoint areas for improvement. It offers cost<br />

savings for all industries,<br />

especially any<br />

that are energy-intensive.<br />

When electricity<br />

consumption and<br />

prices vary, it indicates<br />

the cost of electricity<br />

and provides support<br />

to schedule consumption for off-peak hours. It coordinates<br />

electricity purchases and sales with in-house generation capacity,<br />

then schedules this generation during on-peak hours when<br />

purchased electricity is most expensive. Typical reductions<br />

are4 2% to 5% of total electricity cost. Completely scalable, as<br />

a corporate-wide solution, it can span multiple regions and<br />

countries to serve hundreds of users at different sites.<br />

ABB<br />

(203) 750-2200 / www.abb.com<br />

Put thermal imaging in your pocket<br />

The MikroSHOT offers pocket-sized portability with capabilities<br />

normally found in larger, more expensive thermal<br />

imagers. The camera’s<br />

Thermal-on-Visible<br />

mode allows radiometric<br />

temperature data to be<br />

displayed directly on<br />

the visible image. The<br />

pocket-sized MikroS-<br />

HOT is lightweight (10.5<br />

ounces), uses off-the-shelf<br />

batteries (AC adapter also<br />

included), and features<br />

a 2.7-in. display and<br />

160x120 pixel resolution.<br />

It accommodates a variety of applications with its measuring<br />

range of -4°F to 662°F (-20°C to 350°C), operating temperature<br />

range of 5°F to 122°F (-15°C to 50°C), color alarm and<br />

autofocus at distances 1.4 yards (1.3m) to infinity. The SD<br />

card, USB and video output capability allow analysis of the<br />

JPEG-format data on a laptop or other mobile device using<br />

common software. MikroSpec 4.0 software is included for<br />

image analysis and reporting.<br />

Mikron<br />

(201) 405-0900 / www.mikroshot.com<br />

Immerse this<br />

The immersible Steel-Mass Model<br />

640S features a self-cleaning purge<br />

port to remove tough, caked-on<br />

dust deposits. With 316 stainless steel<br />

wetted parts, the meter handles gas flow<br />

applications and dirty liquid flows where<br />

residue buildup can reduce accuracy. The<br />

unit compliess with ANSI/NCSL Z540 and<br />

MIL-STD-45662A, and is certified to ISO<br />

9001 standards. It’s approved for use in<br />

hazardous areas. Meter accuracy is 1% of<br />

reading plus 0.5% of full scale with repeatability<br />

of 0.2% of full scale. A ¾-in. sensor<br />

probe inserts into ducts and pipes (to 72<br />

in.) with a range of process connections<br />

(including hot tap). Multipoint flow averaging<br />

arrays are available, complete<br />

with a self-contained touchscreen<br />

human-machine interface.<br />

Sierra Instruments<br />

(800) 866-0200 / www.sierrainstruments.com<br />

www.PLANTSERVICES.com APRIL 2009 47


MRO MARKETPLACE<br />

STEAM GENERATOR BROCHURE<br />

The steam generator brochure from Clayton Industries<br />

– your single source for steam technology for more<br />

than 75 years – tells the inside story on advanced<br />

steam technology. Clayton offers worldwide 24/7 service<br />

and a full line of water treatment chemicals to assure<br />

optimum performance. Clayton steam generators<br />

offer significant fuel savings, are small in footprint<br />

and explosive-proof. Download the free catalog at<br />

www.claytonindustries.com.<br />

Clayton Industries<br />

Custom REPRINts<br />

RepRints aRe ideal foR:<br />

For additional information, please contact Foster Printing Service,<br />

the official reprint provider for <strong>Plant</strong> <strong>Services</strong>.<br />

Call 866.879.9144 or sales@fosterprinting.com<br />

New subhead to come<br />

Your Single Worldwide Source For Steam Technology<br />

Use reprints to maximize<br />

your marketing initiatives and<br />

strengthen your brand’s value.<br />

Reprints are a simple way to put information directly into the hands of your<br />

target audience. Having been featured in a well-respected publication adds<br />

the credibility of a third-party endorsement to your message.<br />

n New Product Announcements n Sales Aid For Your Field Force<br />

n PR Materials & Media Kits n Direct Mail Enclosures n Conferences &<br />

Speaking Engagements n Recruitment & Training Packages n Customer &<br />

Prospect Communications/Presentations n Trade Shows/Promotional Events<br />

• STEAM GENERATORS &<br />

WASTE HEAT BOILERS<br />

• FEEDWATER<br />

COMPONENTS<br />

• CHEMICALS<br />

• SERVICE<br />

The Inside Story on<br />

Advanced Steam Technology...<br />

PERFORMANCE | RELIABILIT Y | EFFICIENCY | ASSE T MANAGEMENT<br />

SALES OFFICES<br />

MIKE BRENNER, GRO<strong>UP</strong> PUBLISHER<br />

AR, AZ, Northern CA, CO, ID, IL, MN,<br />

MT, NE, NV, NM, ND, OK, OR, SD, UT,<br />

WA, WI, WY<br />

Phone: (630) 467-1300, ext. 487<br />

Fax: (630) 467-1120<br />

e-mail: mbrenner@putman.net<br />

JERRY BURNS, DISTRICT MANAGER<br />

AL, Southern CA, CT, DE, FL, GA, LA,<br />

ME, MD, MA, MS, NH, NJ, NY, NC, PA,<br />

RI, SC, TX, VT, VA, DC, WV<br />

Phone: (630) 467-1300, ext. 427<br />

Fax: (630) 467-1120<br />

e-mail: jburns@putman.net<br />

MICHAEL CONNAUGHTON,<br />

ACCOUNT EXECUTIVE<br />

IA, IN, KS, KY, MI, MO, OH, TN, Canada,<br />

Literature Reviews, Inside Print and<br />

Digital Sales<br />

Phone: (513) 543-6432<br />

Fax: (630) 467-1120<br />

e-mail: mconnaughton@putman.net<br />

POLLY DICKSON,<br />

INSIDE SALES MANAGER<br />

Classifieds<br />

Phone: (630) 467-1300, ext. 396<br />

Fax: (630) 364-4175<br />

e-mail: pdickson@putman.net<br />

NORM KLIEMAN,<br />

INSIDE SALES MANAGER<br />

Digital Sales<br />

Phone: (630) 467-1300, ext. 344<br />

Fax: (630) 467-1120<br />

e-mail: nklieman@putman.net<br />

SUBSCRIPTION INFORMATION<br />

(888) 644-1803 or (847) 559-7360<br />

REPRINTS<br />

FOSTER REPRINTS, (866) 879-9144<br />

www.fostereprints.com<br />

PUTMAN MEDIA, INC.<br />

555 W. Pierce Rd., Ste. 301,<br />

Itasca, IL 60143<br />

Phone: (630) 467-1300,<br />

Fax: (630) 467-1120<br />

ADVERTISER INDEX<br />

ABB Low Voltage Motor 22<br />

American Technical Publishers 46<br />

Atlas Copco Compressors 10<br />

Baker Instrument Company 41<br />

Baldor Electric Co. 4<br />

Carrier Rental Systems 14<br />

Clayton Industries 26<br />

Donaldson Company, Inc.Torit 13<br />

Donaldson Company, Inc.Ultrafilter 3<br />

Eventure Events 18<br />

FabEnCo 40<br />

Fluke<br />

IFC<br />

IFS North America 20<br />

Inpro/Seal Company 8<br />

Kaeser Compressors<br />

BC<br />

Legris 34<br />

Lubriplate Lubricants 6<br />

Ludeca 28<br />

Lutz Pumps 40<br />

PdMA 33<br />

Somax 29<br />

Topps Products 46<br />

Unicco<br />

IBC<br />

Winware 27<br />

PLANT SERVICES (ISSN 0199-8013) is published monthly<br />

by Putman Media, Inc., 555 West Pierce Road, Suite 301,<br />

C: Itasca, IL M: 060143. Phone (630) 467-1300, Fax (847) 291-<br />

4816. Periodicals Y: 100 Postage paid at Itasca, IL and additional<br />

K: 28<br />

mailing offices. Canada Post International Publications<br />

PMS 370 C<br />

Mail Product Sales Agreement No. 40028661. Canadian<br />

Mail Distributor Information: Frontier/BWI,PO Box 1051,<br />

Fort Erie, Ontario, Canada, L2A 5N8. Printed in U.S.A.<br />

POSTMASTER: Send address changes to PLANT SERVICES,<br />

Putman Media, Inc., PO Box 3435, Northbrook, IL 60065-<br />

3435. SUBSCRIPTIONS: Qualified reader subscriptions are<br />

accepted from PLANT SERVICES managers, supervisors<br />

and engineers in manufacturing plants in the U.S. and<br />

Canada. To apply for qualified-reader subscriptions, please<br />

go to www.plantservices.com. To non-qualified subscribers<br />

in the U.S., subscriptions are $96 per year. Single copies<br />

are $15, except the September and October issues which<br />

are $36. Canadian and foreign annual subscriptions are<br />

accepted at $145 (Foreign airmail $200/yr). Single copies<br />

are $81. © 2009 by Putman Media, Inc. All rights reserved.<br />

The contents of this publication may not be reproduced in<br />

whole or in part without consent of the copyright owner. In<br />

an effort to more closely align with our business partners<br />

in a manner that provides the most value to our readers,<br />

content published in PLANT SERVICES magazine appears<br />

on the public domain of PLANT SERVICES’ Website,<br />

and may also appear on Websites that apply to our<br />

growing marketplace. Putman Media, Inc. also publishes<br />

CHEMICAL PROCESSING, CONTROL, CONTROL DESIGN,<br />

FOOD PROCESSING, INDUSTRIAL NETWORKING, THE<br />

JOURNAL, PHARMACEUTICAL MANUFACTURING and<br />

WELLNESS FOODS. PLANT SERVICES assumes no<br />

responsibility for validity of claims in items published.<br />

48 APRIL 2009 WWW.PLANTSERVICES.COM


KwikBond_Ad.pdf 12/5/07 11:58:45 AM<br />

classifieds<br />

Products and services<br />

load bank rentals<br />

ComRent ®<br />

International, LLC<br />

13 nationwide inventory centers<br />

The industry leader in right,<br />

ready and reliable power testing<br />

solutions since 1997.<br />

(888)881-7118 www.comrent.com<br />

OIL MIST & SMOKE<br />

IN YOUR SHOP<br />

www.mistcollectors.com<br />

Tel: 1-800-645-4174<br />

HOT & DIRTY<br />

ELIMINATE<br />

CoNtrol<br />

Valve ENClosurEs<br />

Cavitation<br />

Electra<br />

tm<br />

Kool<br />

• Eliminate valve cavitation by<br />

Filter/Ventilators forcefully<br />

placing one or more diffusers<br />

blow out hot air & cool with<br />

downstream of the valve.<br />

finely filtered ambient air!<br />

• Noise and pipe vibration will<br />

Less $$ than AC or Vortex<br />

also be eliminated or reduced.<br />

Tubes! Five models for any<br />

• Valve’s first size costs enclosure! and Since mainte 1980!<br />

nance burden will also be reduced.<br />

info@wayneproducts.com FrEE Catalog!<br />

www.wayneproducts.com 1 800 255-5665<br />

Control Connection<br />

THE CAREER RESOURCE FOR PROCESS AUTOMATION PROFESSIONALS<br />

Control Connection<br />

725 Parkview Cir,<br />

Elk Grove Vlg, IL 60007<br />

Phone 847-439-2303<br />

rcronfel@comcast.net www.cuservices.net<br />

THE CAREER RESOURCE FOR MACHINE AUTOMATION PROFESSIONALS<br />

ChemConnection<br />

THE CAREER RESOURCE FOR CHEMICAL PROCESSING PROFESSIONALS<br />

<strong>Plant</strong> Connection<br />

THE CAREER RESOURCE FOR PLANT ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALS<br />

Pharma Connection<br />

THE CAREER RESOURCE FOR PHARMACEUTICAL PROFESSIONALS<br />

Food Connection<br />

HOT & DIRTY<br />

CoNtrol<br />

OILY WATER<br />

Mini & MAXI-Skimmers TM<br />

Collect economically! Several<br />

types with 1 qt - 100 gph rates!<br />

Reach from 5” to 100 ft. down!<br />

Also use with coolants & parts<br />

wash fluids! Thousands in use<br />

since 1990!<br />

View product info at<br />

www.wayneproducts.com<br />

call 800 255-5665 or email to<br />

info@wayneproducts.com<br />

• Digital Edition<br />

• e-newsletters<br />

• Subscriptions<br />

ENClosurEs<br />

Electra<br />

tm<br />

Kool<br />

Filter/Ventilators forcefully<br />

blow out hot air & cool with<br />

finely filtered ambient air!<br />

Less $$ than AC or Vortex<br />

Tubes! Five models for any<br />

size enclosure! Since 1980!<br />

Always up and Running<br />

• White Papers<br />

• Skill TV<br />

• Plus much more!<br />

FLOOR PROBLEMS<br />

• Easy to apply by in-house maintenance staff<br />

• 1 hour set and cure<br />

• Performance Guaranteed!!<br />

www.kwikbond.com<br />

1-800-820-0680<br />

www.PLANTSERVICES.com APRIL 2009 49


energy exPErt<br />

peter garforth<br />

GrEEn DIEsEL: An Oxymoron<br />

Biodiesel and ethanol don’t belong in the same breath<br />

Burning gasoline and diesel in cars is the second-largest<br />

cause of U.S. greenhouse gas emissions (after buildings and<br />

homes). About 70% of oil is imported, which exports billions<br />

of dollars and adds little value to the U.S. economy. In terms<br />

of pollution, cost and supply security, reducing automotive<br />

petroleum use is generally good for both the country and the<br />

planet. Can biofuels be a major factor in improving supply<br />

reliability, reducing pollution and even reducing costs<br />

As with all energy questions, the first supply source should<br />

HEAT rECOvery is THE LArGEst<br />

immEDIATELy avAILABLE U.S. energy<br />

sOUrCE.<br />

always be higher efficiency. Reducing the average weight of<br />

a car by 20% to 40% by using lighter materials and choosing<br />

smaller vehicles would dramatically reduce oil use. A Toyota<br />

Camry weighs 3,500 lbs and a Corolla weighs 2,600 lbs. This<br />

900-lb difference provides an 18% gain in fuel efficiency by<br />

dropping one vehicle size. In the next couple of vehicle-design<br />

cycles, we can expect significantly lower weights as new materials<br />

like composites and aluminum substitute for steel and<br />

heavier plastics. Even relatively small changes in weight across<br />

the U.S. fleet would reduce oil use far more than any current<br />

targets likely to come from a switch to using ethanol.<br />

After efficiency, the next step is to look at fuel choice.<br />

Nearly all U.S. cars and light trucks use gasoline. The United<br />

States recently introduced low-sulfur diesel, already available<br />

in Europe for a number of years. Diesel cars use 20% to<br />

30% less fuel. In Europe, just about every model can be purchased<br />

with a clean-diesel engine, including small vehicles<br />

like the Toyota Yaris, and sporty ones like the BMW 7 series<br />

and the Mercedes S Class. Even the humble Ford Focus has<br />

three diesel engine choices. In a recent fuel economy race,<br />

the diesel Yaris exceeded 70 mpg. A Corolla with a cleandiesel<br />

engine has fuel efficiency similar to a Prius. The same<br />

car would be 40% more fuel efficient than a gasoline Camry.<br />

More than 60% of new cars sold in Europe are clean diesels.<br />

Probably the next logical step for the U.S. government<br />

would be to encourage a switch to clean diesels, because<br />

every manufacturer, including Ford and GM, already has<br />

them; they simply don’t sell them here.<br />

Biofuels are proposed as a partial alternative. Ethanol<br />

has less energy than gasoline on a volume basis, so more is<br />

needed to go the same distance. In the United States, bioethanol<br />

is mixed at 85% with gasoline, and engines require<br />

some redesign to handle the fuel. U.S. bio-ethanol mostly<br />

is made from corn, which uses energy for planting, fertilizing,<br />

harvesting and refining. Even more energy is needed to<br />

transport it for sale. By some estimates, it takes at least 80%<br />

more energy to make the ethanol than it provides to drive<br />

the car. Thus, the overall environmental gain is very small,<br />

the avoided imports negligible, and the costs are high. Also,<br />

corn is the base ingredient of a lot of food products, including<br />

meat, so the diversion to ethanol pushed up food prices.<br />

Biodiesel, on the other hand, can be refined from many<br />

sources, including used cooking oil and agricultural waste.<br />

Oil seeds grow on poor land and need little fertilizer. Diesel<br />

engines need little alteration to use biodiesel, even at 100%.<br />

Algae are attracting a lot of attention as a source of biofuel.<br />

Where large amounts of mid- to low-grade heat are available,<br />

it’s possible to grow algae with very high natural oil content that<br />

can be refined into a diesel fuel with good calorific value.<br />

As with any biological product, energy is needed to sustain<br />

algae growth, so it’s essential to find heat sources that<br />

are cheap, readily available and low in eco-side-effects. Two<br />

hold out promise: sunlight and waste heat recovered from<br />

electricity generation. Heat recovery is the largest immediately<br />

available energy source, if we can work out how to use<br />

it. Growing algae to make biodiesel might be one such use,<br />

with the added advantage that the algae need carbon dioxide<br />

to thrive, and fossil-based power plants make plenty of it.<br />

The next step up the efficiency ladder will be dieselelectric<br />

hybrids. The first ones are expected in the market<br />

in 2010 from Peugeot and Volkswagen. These will reach yet<br />

another level of efficiency of 60 mpg to 70 mpg in a vehicle<br />

about the size of a Corolla. Powered with biodiesel, this will<br />

be a much less polluting than any other immediately available<br />

car technology, at a fairly reasonable cost.<br />

Whether it’s from plants or algae, biodiesel is likely to<br />

be more useful than bio-ethanol refined from foodstuffs in<br />

terms of being a practical, efficient and environmentally less<br />

damaging substitute for fossil oil-based transport fuels.<br />

Peter Garforth is principal of Garforth International LLC, Toledo,<br />

Ohio. E-mail him at garforthp@cs.com.<br />

50 APRIL 2009 www.PLANTSERVICES.com


Short-term maintenance never sticks.<br />

Enter UGL Unicco <strong>Plant</strong> <strong>Services</strong>. Our proactive approach to facilities maintenance means you can<br />

avoid issues instead of reacting to them. For any industry, our skilled teams get the job done right the<br />

first time with process-focused, long-term solutions that minimize rework and downtime to reduce<br />

operating costs. visit uglunicco<strong>Plant</strong><strong>Services</strong>.com and download the Free whitepaper: Pursuing<br />

Manufacturing excellence through real-time Performance Management and continuous improvement.<br />

www.ugl-unicco<strong>Plant</strong><strong>Services</strong>.com<br />

Strategic Planning I engineering I FacilitieS Maintenance I energy ManageMent I SuPPort ServiceS


At Kaeser, our tradition of saving<br />

energy goes back generations.<br />

Energy costs have never been higher. That’s why it’s so important<br />

to get maximum efficiency out of your compressed air system.<br />

And with as much as 50%* of compressed air being wasted, you<br />

could save a bundle.<br />

Trust the specialists at Kaeser to find energy savings by<br />

reducing inefficiency in your air system, while also cutting maintenance<br />

costs and delivering process improvements. We are the<br />

industry leader in conducting true, comprehensive air system audits,<br />

so you know you’ll get the best possible advice and recommendations.<br />

Visit www.kaeser.com/ada to see if you’ll benefit from an<br />

Air Demand Analysis (ADA) - and how we’ve helped other plants<br />

significantly improve their bottom line.<br />

Kaeser Compressors, Inc. n (866) 516-6888<br />

* Source: U.S. Department of Energy; Compresed Air Challenge ® . ©2009 Kaeser Compressors, Inc. All rights reserved.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!