31.01.2015 Views

POWER UP A WINNER - Plant Services

POWER UP A WINNER - Plant Services

POWER UP A WINNER - Plant Services

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

GET RECESSION-<br />

FIGHTING SAVINGS<br />

WITH CLAYTON<br />

STEAM BOILERS<br />

Worldwide Energy<br />

Savings: $134-Million!<br />

You can save a bundle in energy<br />

costs and gain production-boosting<br />

performance, too. How With Clayton<br />

steam boilers, noted worldwide for<br />

keeping fuel consumption low and<br />

reducing greenhouse gas emissions<br />

(In just one year, for example, plants<br />

around the globe that used Clayton<br />

steam boilers saved $134-million in<br />

fuel costs.)<br />

Other benefits: unique counterflow<br />

technology for better efficiency,<br />

small footprint, low NOx emissions,<br />

quick start-ups, even pressure<br />

when demand fluctuates and great<br />

performance on numerous fuels or<br />

combinations.<br />

Clayton steam boilers.<br />

Benefiting budgets for 79 years.<br />

17477 Hurley Street<br />

City of Industry, CA 91744-5106<br />

800.423.4585 tel • 626.435.0180 fax<br />

email: sales@claytonindustries.com<br />

www.claytonindustries.com<br />

performance / software<br />

Table 2. Sample Selection Criteria<br />

Company Information Weight<br />

Company profile 4<br />

Financial position 6<br />

Customer installations 5<br />

Competitive advantage 5<br />

20<br />

Product & Hardware<br />

Configurability 4<br />

Web architecture 2<br />

Open systems 3<br />

9<br />

Technical Information<br />

Recovery & backup 2<br />

Auditing & security 2<br />

Documentation 2<br />

Interface requirements 4<br />

10<br />

Support <strong>Services</strong><br />

Support 6<br />

Ease of implementation 10<br />

Training 5<br />

21<br />

Cost Effectiveness<br />

Base package 35<br />

Options & additions 10<br />

Ongoing services 10<br />

General 5<br />

60<br />

Technical Specs<br />

User interface 16<br />

Work planning & scheduling 16<br />

Health, safety & environment 16<br />

Maintenance optimization 16<br />

KPIs & analysis tools 16<br />

80<br />

Total Score 200<br />

Build process/system requirements:<br />

One of the most critical steps in planning<br />

for a new or replacement CMMS/EAM<br />

is to determine your needs. Procuring a<br />

CMMS/EAM system isn’t about finding<br />

the best software package on the market.<br />

The key to a successful implementation<br />

is selecting a CMMS/EAM package that<br />

best fits with your requirements. There<br />

are many wonderful CMMS/EAM packages<br />

available today, but every one of<br />

them has its strengths and weaknesses.<br />

Your task is to determine user specifications<br />

based on the needs of stakeholders<br />

(e.g., maintenance, operations, engineering,<br />

IT, materials management, purchasing,<br />

finance), and then choose the<br />

combination of CMMS/EAM vendor and<br />

software package that can best deliver on<br />

your needs.<br />

It’s critical to invest about three to six<br />

months in the design of new processes<br />

and supporting system specifications<br />

with participation of key stakeholders.<br />

This must be done before the selection<br />

phase begins so you can filter the sales<br />

pitch from each vendor and steer them<br />

to exactly what you need to see demonstrated<br />

to determine the best fit. Many<br />

companies naively believe that there’s no<br />

point in spending time on process design<br />

until the system has been selected. Although<br />

it’s true that your process design<br />

can’t be finalized at a detailed level before<br />

knowing which software package you’ll<br />

purchase, it also has been shown through<br />

30 years of track records that neglecting<br />

to engage stakeholders in process design<br />

before the selection will increase the<br />

probability of failure.<br />

The methodology should define<br />

process flows that reflect the current state<br />

and the desired future state. The futurestate<br />

processes will be supported by best<br />

practices and enabling system specifications.<br />

For example, perhaps the future<br />

state processes indicate stakeholder desire<br />

to move to a more planned environment<br />

from the current state of firefighting. Reducing<br />

the high percentage of emergency<br />

and reactive maintenance requires more<br />

preventive and condition-based maintenance,<br />

better planning and scheduling,<br />

and a variety of analysis tools for<br />

managing the transition. Addressing the<br />

gap between current state and the desired<br />

state presents a number of challenges that<br />

should be discussed long before a system<br />

is selected, such as:<br />

26 APRIL 2009 www.PLANTSERVICES.com

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!