31.01.2015 Views

POWER UP A WINNER - Plant Services

POWER UP A WINNER - Plant Services

POWER UP A WINNER - Plant Services

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Reliability / Piping<br />

rations that can reconcile these conflicting Pressure counts<br />

criteria for more sustainable piping systems.<br />

Industry has made great strides in<br />

reducing the number of leaks from<br />

flanged joints, and some plants have even<br />

eliminated them. Because reliable piping<br />

system performance, including pumps,<br />

valves and other equipment, is critical to<br />

plant sustainability both operationally<br />

and environmentally, it’s vital to pay careful<br />

attention to these flanged joints and<br />

the gaskets that keep them from leaking.<br />

Before replacing a leaking gasket, make<br />

sure you’ve identified the root cause of the<br />

leak. A good place to start is to verify that<br />

the proper gasket was installed in the first place based on the<br />

operating parameters of the system, notably temperature, media<br />

and pressure. The first consideration should be temperature<br />

because it can eliminate many unsuitable gasket materials from<br />

consideration. Next, look at the media’s chemical compatibility<br />

with the gasket, including any secondary media to which the<br />

gasket might be exposed, such as fluids that are intermittently<br />

present during chemical or steam/hot-water flushing. Then<br />

consider pressure. Most systems operate at relatively consistent<br />

pressure, but it’s important to take into account severe spikes or<br />

surges that might occur.<br />

However, selecting the right gasket requires an understanding<br />

of the application that goes beyond these criteria.<br />

Flanged joints rarely leak because chemicals attacked the<br />

gasket. Most people understand that gasket materials must<br />

be compatible with system media. Likewise, it’s rare to find a<br />

piping system that exceeds a gasket’s maximum pressure or<br />

temperature ratings.<br />

Figure 2. This compressed sheet gasket<br />

installed in a flat-faced flange failed<br />

because of insufficient compression.<br />

flanges for vacuum service (Figure 2).<br />

The available stress for these types of<br />

flanges varies widely. For example, an<br />

8-in., 150# raised-face flange and a ring<br />

gasket having a contact area of 32.2 sq.<br />

in., a bolt stress of 60,000 psi and a bolt<br />

torque of 200 ft.-lbs. produces 4,800<br />

psi of gasket compression. The same<br />

size flange with a flat face, fitted with<br />

an 80-sq.-in., full-face gasket under the<br />

same bolt stress and torque, results in<br />

gasket stress of only 1,813 psi, about<br />

38% of that from the ring gasket with its<br />

smaller contact area.<br />

As a general rule, therefore, the best<br />

choice for raised-face flanges are ring gaskets made of compressed<br />

sheet, PTFE, graphite or metal. Use full-face rubber<br />

gaskets or gaskets with molded-in sealing rings with greatly<br />

reduced contact area for flat-face flanges.<br />

Valves and pumps with flat flanges and standard ASME<br />

drilling can produce a stress between 1,000 psi and 2,000<br />

psi; glass-lined flanges produce between 2,000 psi and 3,500<br />

psi; flat-faced, non-metallic flanges from 150 psi to 500 psi;<br />

and angle-iron flanges around 100 psi to 300 psi. The bolting<br />

on some flanges used in vacuum service produces almost no<br />

compressive load.<br />

Even within these low-load flanges, there’s considerable<br />

variation in available load. Not all nonmetallic flanges are flat<br />

faced; many have raised ridges to concentrate the load. Some<br />

are stub-end designs in which the contact surface is confined<br />

to within the bolt circle and the bolted flange slips on behind<br />

Technological rescue<br />

Compressive load key to performance<br />

More often than not, flanged joint gasket failures result<br />

from the mechanics of the application, usually from incorrect<br />

compressive load. Eliminating such a simple cause<br />

requires knowing the type of flange in which the gasket will<br />

be installed, including the material and bolting information,<br />

to determine the compressive force. This is extremely important<br />

because nearly 70% of gasket failures are attributable to<br />

insufficient load (Figure 1).<br />

This root cause might be uneven bolt loads, but it’s far<br />

more common that achieving proper loading was impossible<br />

given the flange design and available bolting. Under the<br />

same bolting scheme, a flat-faced flange with a full-face gasket,<br />

for example, won’t apply the same compressive force to<br />

the gasket as a raised-face flange with its smaller compressed<br />

area. Flange types that produce low compressive gasket<br />

loads include flat-faced cast iron flanges commonly found in<br />

valves and pumps, flanges on glass-lined equipment, nonmetallic<br />

flanges, rolled angle-iron flanges for ductwork, and<br />

Figure 3. This gasket’s raised, molded-in rings allow it to seal<br />

with 75% less surface contact. The lower seating stress makes it<br />

suitable for nonmetallic flanges.<br />

36 APRIL 2009 www.PLANTSERVICES.com

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!