31.01.2015 Views

FRAME Calculation examples book. - FRAME Fire Risk Assessment ...

FRAME Calculation examples book. - FRAME Fire Risk Assessment ...

FRAME Calculation examples book. - FRAME Fire Risk Assessment ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

F.R.A.M.E.<br />

Content factor: 1 M. Euro c=0.00<br />

environment factor r r= 0.30<br />

dependency factor d d= 0.50<br />

Acceptable <strong>Risk</strong>s A= 0.58 A1= 0.28 A2 =0.98<br />

Water supplies adequate W=1.00<br />

Normal protection limited training, nearest<br />

N = 0.90<br />

station at less than 10<br />

min<br />

Special Protection part time fire brigade S= 1.34<br />

<strong>Fire</strong> resistance Structure: 30<br />

F=1.28<br />

Walls: 30<br />

Ceiling:30<br />

Partitions:30<br />

Escape protection sub compartments,<br />

U=1.80<br />

adequate signalisation<br />

Salvage sub compartments Y=1.10<br />

Calculated <strong>Risk</strong>s: R= 2.48 R1= 3.50 R2=1.38<br />

Conclusion:<br />

A catastrophe could be expected.<br />

Notes.<br />

1. The report indicates a capacity of 148 residents. With staff and visitors an occupancy load of<br />

350 persons could be estimated, below the 486 based on code occupant load numbers. A lower<br />

number of occupants would still give an unacceptable high risk level.<br />

2. The smoke detectors in corridors were not accounted for as those are not the critical areas<br />

(the rooms should be considered as critical) .<br />

3. New nursing homes of this type would require sprinkler protection according to NFPA 101.<br />

Adding sprinkler protection would reduce the risk levels to : R=1.10 , R1=1.40 and R2=0.66 .<br />

This means that <strong>FRAME</strong> does not consider adding sprinklers as adequate enough. Additionally<br />

automatic smoke detection would be required to get an acceptable level of safety for the<br />

occupants. This is because of the low mobility of the residents which requires a fast detection<br />

and reaction.<br />

On the other hand, if the 4 wings of the building were properly separated by compartment<br />

walls and fire doors, whereby the number of people at risk would be below 100, a smoke<br />

detection system would provide adequate protection according to <strong>FRAME</strong>.<br />

Case study 15. A clue for arson : Office in Bristol (UK), June 1 st , 1989.<br />

Reference : <strong>Fire</strong> Prevention 232, September 1990<br />

<strong>FRAME</strong> calculation :<br />

Item explanation (sub) factor Value Result<br />

Type of occupancy Bristol computer suite 1989<br />

<strong>Fire</strong> load immobile Qi 300<br />

<strong>Fire</strong> load mobile Qm 600 q=1.42<br />

Temperature rise computers T 100<br />

Average dimension m 0.3<br />

Reaction to fire M 2 i=1.15<br />

Length l 100<br />

Width b 30 g=0.74<br />

Level E 5 e=1.60<br />

Height of room h 4<br />

Ventilation k 0.5 % v=1.02<br />

Access direction Z 3<br />

26

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!