31.01.2015 Views

FRAME Calculation examples book. - FRAME Fire Risk Assessment ...

FRAME Calculation examples book. - FRAME Fire Risk Assessment ...

FRAME Calculation examples book. - FRAME Fire Risk Assessment ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

F.R.A.M.E.<br />

site<br />

<strong>Fire</strong> resistance Structure: 30<br />

Walls: 60<br />

Ceiling: 15<br />

Partitions:0<br />

Escape protection Detection, max. 300,<br />

smoke vents actuated<br />

mixed<br />

concrete<br />

steel<br />

F=1.24<br />

U=3.39<br />

Salvage relocation, data protected Y=2.08<br />

Calculated <strong>Risk</strong>s: R= 1.28 R1= 0.53 R2=0.39<br />

Conclusion:<br />

high level of protection for people and business, higher risk for<br />

property acceptable<br />

A second calculation was made for a 13 000 m² warehouse that was accessible on two sides .<br />

The calculated risks were R= 1.11 R1=0.52 and R2 =0.37 , which shows a comparable risk<br />

level.<br />

A third calculation was made for an undivided warehouse of 21 600 m² with sprinkler<br />

protection instead of smoke detection. The calculated risks were R= 0.98 , R1=0.89 and R2=<br />

0.29 . This gives a better risk, but the cost of the sprinklers was much higher than that of<br />

improving the quality of the existing separations to a firewall type construction.<br />

A fourth calculation was made for a compartment of 4000 m² size, were the plastic pellets<br />

were bagged in PVC bags.<br />

Potential risks were lower as the fire load and the area were smaller :<br />

P = 2.41 P1= 2.02 P2 = 1.46<br />

The values of the acceptable risks indicated a higher exposure , because of the activity :<br />

A = 1.25 A1 = 1.05 A2 = 1.20<br />

The protection degrees were basically the same as the concept was unchanged.<br />

The balance of all elements resulted in the following risk levels :<br />

R= 0.65 R1= 0.73 R2 = 0.36<br />

The concept was considered as adequate for the plant.<br />

Case study 19. <strong>Fire</strong> safety of a historical building.<br />

The manager of a 13-15 th century monastery, used as museum and cultural centre wanted to<br />

know what the level of fire safety was of this building.<br />

Construction : 2250 m² in a U-shape, 3 levels, very thick stone and masonry walls, wooden<br />

floors, some with tiles, slate roof on massive oak structure. No effective compartimentation<br />

because of two monumental stairs joining the three levels.<br />

The building is accessible on one side only, the other sides are adjacent buildings and a river;<br />

the city water supply is only a 3" pipe; The building is equipped with extinguishers, hose reels,<br />

a fire alarm system and partial fire detection. Notification to the fire brigade is by the staff.<br />

The fire load is low, except for a library with old <strong>book</strong>s, located in the North wing; this library<br />

has a wooden floor and a decorated wooden ceiling, which is also the floor of meeting room at<br />

the upper level. This room can receive about 150 persons and has one adequate and one<br />

limited exit to stairs.<br />

In the central wing, there is a small restaurant and a kitchen.<br />

32

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!