03.02.2015 Views

lightfair international - Illuminating Engineering Society

lightfair international - Illuminating Engineering Society

lightfair international - Illuminating Engineering Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

is easier. Replacement lamp costs are<br />

about the same. For example, eight<br />

F32T8 lamps cost about the same as one<br />

400 W HPS or metal halide lamp.<br />

HID technology has not stood still. The<br />

most significant ongoing improvement<br />

is pulse start metal halide lamps and<br />

ballasts with ignitors to drive them. This<br />

system provides substantial gains in lm/W,<br />

lumen maintenance, color stability,<br />

shorter warm up times, shorter restrike<br />

times, and minimum ambient temperature<br />

starting. Lamp life can also be extended.<br />

This system could replace standard<br />

metal halide and HPS. Currently there is<br />

a price premium, but much of that could<br />

evaporate down the road.<br />

There are other HID improvements,<br />

such as energy saving lamps, extended<br />

life lamps, double arc tube lamps, high<br />

CRI, electronic ballasts, two stage (highlow)<br />

systems with occupancy sensors<br />

and/or photocontrols, and fixtures with<br />

quartz backup, but most of these<br />

upgrades are quite expensive. Some<br />

have drawbacks. An example is color corrected<br />

HPS lamps that have much better<br />

color rendering, but also higher cost,<br />

reduced light output, and shorter lamp<br />

life. Electronic HID ballasts consume less<br />

wattage than magnetic HID ballasts, but<br />

HID lamps draw the same wattage either<br />

way. Although the two stage systems for<br />

HID do reduce power at low stage, it<br />

is not linear. At 50 percent light output,<br />

wattage is considerably higher than 50<br />

percent often in the 60–70 percent range.<br />

Better Way To Measure Light<br />

The long established way of measuring<br />

the amount of light a source produces<br />

has been the photopic lumen. The<br />

lumens listed in lamp catalogs are photopic<br />

lumens. It is very easy to perceive<br />

that photopic lumens are not realistic.<br />

Following are two examples.<br />

Compare 14,000 photopic lumens<br />

175 W, 65 CRI standard metal halide<br />

with 16,000 photopic lumens 150 W,<br />

22 CRI standard HPS. Metal halide and<br />

HPS are the two most common types of<br />

HID. Although the metal halide has<br />

slightly less photopic lumens, virtually<br />

everyone perceives that it is brighter<br />

than the higher photopic output HPS.<br />

Another example is four various color<br />

tone fluorescent lamps with not only<br />

almost identical photopic lumens but<br />

also identical CRI. When an F32T8<br />

830, F32T8 835, F32T8 841, and<br />

F32T8 850 lamp are compared, almost<br />

everyone perceives the 850 lamp the<br />

brightest, followed by the 841 lamp,<br />

the 835, and the 830 lamp the least<br />

bright.<br />

With the substantial inconsistency<br />

between photopic lumens and general<br />

perception, we no longer base lighting<br />

recommendations on just photopic lumens<br />

or light meter measurements. Things got<br />

more scientific after we stumbled on Sam<br />

Berman’s work on pupil lumens (later<br />

called task modified lumens) all beautifully<br />

explained in his and Brian Liebel’s<br />

“Essay By Invitation” in the November<br />

1996 LD+A. 1<br />

Photopic lumens are based on the<br />

eye’s two degree central field of vision.<br />

This is only 0.02 percent of the human<br />

total visual field. There are two types of<br />

photoreceptors: cones and rods. In this<br />

two degree central field of vision, cones<br />

are the main photoreceptors and photopic<br />

lumens are based on cone sensitivity.<br />

Rods, which greatly outnumber cones,<br />

are excluded in photopic lumens. The<br />

peak sensitivity for rods is in the bluegreen<br />

region of the spectrum, compared<br />

to green-yellow for cones. Scopotic<br />

lumens are based on rod sensitivity.<br />

Both cones and rods contribute to how<br />

the eye perceives light for daytime tasks.<br />

S/P (scotopic/photopic ratios) can be<br />

used as a tool to show how the human<br />

eye really sees. Page 79 of the 1996<br />

Philips Lighting’s Lamp Specification<br />

and Application Guide has S/P ratios<br />

for many fluorescent lamps, including<br />

1.83 S/P for F32T8 850 and 1.62 S/P<br />

for F32T8 841. In addition to that listing,<br />

standard 40K clear metal halide has<br />

1.49 S/P, standard HPS has 0.62 S/P,<br />

and low pressure sodium has 0.40 S/P.<br />

For the vast majority of applications the<br />

higher the ratio the better.<br />

Berman and Liebel listed three task<br />

application factors for various tasks. For<br />

general evaluation we tend to use the 0.78<br />

exponent, where good vision is a requirement.<br />

photopic lumens x (S/P) 0.78 = initial<br />

task modified lumens<br />

We believe that worst case, when lamps<br />

are old, is more relevant, so we include<br />

lumen maintenance in the equation.<br />

photopic lumens x (S/P) 0.78 x<br />

lumen maintenance = end-of-life task<br />

modified lumens<br />

Generic composites of a variety of<br />

lamp and ballast combinations are<br />

shown in Table 1.<br />

Recent Applications<br />

Contra Costa Newspapers, Walnut<br />

Creek, CA<br />

Circle 13 on Reader Service Card.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!