18.02.2015 Views

Berry

Berry

Berry

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Data Mining Applications 103<br />

How the Model Affects Profitability<br />

How does the model whose lift and benefit are characterized by Figure 4.2<br />

affect the profitability of a campaign? The answer depends on the start-up cost<br />

for the campaign, the underlying prevalence of responders in the population<br />

and on the cutoff penetration of people contacted. Recall that SAC had a budget<br />

of $300,000. Assume that the underlying prevalence of responders in the<br />

population is 1 percent. The budget is enough to contact 300,000 prospects, or<br />

30 percent of the prospect pool. At a depth of 30 percent, the model provides lift<br />

of about 2, so SAC can expect twice as many responders as they would have<br />

without the model. In this case, twice as many means 2 percent instead of 1 percent,<br />

yielding 6,000 (2% * 300,000) responders each of whom is worth $44 in net<br />

revenue. Under these assumptions, SAC grosses $600,000 and nets $264,000<br />

from responders. Meanwhile, 98 percent of prospects or 294,000 do not<br />

respond. Each of these costs a dollar, so SAC loses $30,000 on the campaign.<br />

Table 4.4 shows the data used to generate the concentration chart in Figure<br />

4.2. It suggests that the campaign could be made profitable by spending less<br />

money to contact fewer prospects while getting a better response rate. Mailing<br />

to only 10,000 prospects, or the top 10 percent of the prospect list, achieves a<br />

lift of 3. This turns the underlying response rate of 1 percent into a response<br />

rate of 3 percent. In this scenario, 3,000 people respond yielding revenue of<br />

$132,000. There are now 97,000 people who fail to respond and each of them<br />

costs one dollar. The resulting profit is $35,000. Better still, SAC has $200,000<br />

left in the marketing budget to use on another campaign or to improve the<br />

offer made in this one, perhaps increasing response still more.<br />

Table 4.4 Lift and Cumulative Gains by Decile<br />

CUMULATIVE<br />

PENETRATION GAINS GAINS LIFT<br />

0% 0% 0% 0<br />

10% 30% 30% 3.000<br />

20% 20% 50% 2.500<br />

30% 15% 65% 2.167<br />

40% 13% 78% 1.950<br />

50% 7% 85% 1.700<br />

60% 5% 90% 1.500<br />

70% 4% 94% 1.343<br />

80% 4% 96% 1.225<br />

90% 2% 100% 1.111<br />

100% 0% 100% 1.000

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!