23.02.2015 Views

Nipissing District Housing Needs, Supply & Affordability ... - dnssab

Nipissing District Housing Needs, Supply & Affordability ... - dnssab

Nipissing District Housing Needs, Supply & Affordability ... - dnssab

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The trigger year of 1997 can clearly be noted, when housing expenditures ballooned for<br />

local governments while falling off substantially for the province (as noted by Pomeroy,<br />

there has always been some level of local spending on housing since 1990, especially<br />

by Ontario’s larger cities who participated in the early cost sharing of public housing with<br />

the province). This funding transfer has been a contentious issue for many of Ontario’s<br />

municipalities and it has created a barrier towards increasing the housing supply, as<br />

many municipalities are cash-strapped and do not have the financial means for<br />

additional housing investment. Locally, it has also created a divide as some<br />

municipalities feel that “social housing is a federal and provincial responsibility” – this<br />

has resulted in tension and blurry lines between housing roles and responsibilities (see<br />

figure 12, page 12). Given the above charts, it’s not hard to see where the resentment<br />

comes from.<br />

1.2 Canada –Ontario Affordable <strong>Housing</strong> Program (AHP)<br />

In Nov. 2001, the Federal Government announced a cost-sharing program with the<br />

provinces, with the objective of increasing the supply of affordable housing. Agreements<br />

with the provinces would be negotiated individually and specific to each. In May 2002,<br />

the Ontario Provincial Government and the Federal Government signed the Affordable<br />

<strong>Housing</strong> Program (AHP) agreement, allocating approximately $500 million over the next<br />

5 years, for 10,500 new units. The funding was to be a 1:1 matching contribution:<br />

approx. $250 million from the federal Government, matched by 250 million from the<br />

Province, Municipalities and other private & non-profit partners. There were three<br />

primary areas of funding: affordable rental housing (urban), affordable homeownership<br />

(urban) and affordable housing program (remote). While this agreement represented a<br />

movement back into affordable housing production by the Governments, it was<br />

considered to have fallen short by many, due to a lack of committed funding and the<br />

province /municipalities being unable to meet their matching contributions.<br />

In April 2005, a ‘new’ Canada-Ontario Affordable <strong>Housing</strong> Program agreement was<br />

signed by the federal and provincial governments. Under the new agreement, the federal<br />

and provincial Governments have agreed to a cost-matching contribution of $301million<br />

each and municipalities are not obligated to match funds (some municipalities in the<br />

province however, are contributing funding to the program). The primary objective of the<br />

AHP is to increase the supply of affordable housing supply through four (4) main<br />

components: Rental and Supportive <strong>Housing</strong>; Rent Supplement /<strong>Housing</strong> Allowance;<br />

Northern <strong>Housing</strong> and Homeownership. By 2010, it is intended that the program will<br />

have assisted 20,000 Ontario households.<br />

The early phase of the AHP program has produced the first affordable housing units in<br />

<strong>Nipissing</strong> <strong>District</strong> since 1993 (35 units through PHARA) and there has been full take-up<br />

of the <strong>District</strong>’s AHP allocation of 65 housing allowances. Additionally, there are currently<br />

affordable housing projects in various stages of development within the program,<br />

representing a number of new affordable housing units for the <strong>District</strong>. 9 Given the recent<br />

history of social housing as described above, the AHP activity marks a significant turning<br />

point and is a positive step forward. However, as the following housing indicators and<br />

the rest of this report will show, affordable housing needs to be kept in perspective: the<br />

<strong>District</strong> is in acute need of affordable housing and while the recent AHP activity is a<br />

welcomed start, continuous housing activity will now be needed in order to address both<br />

the backlog of unmet housing need, as well as the future need.<br />

9. The AHP is covered in more detail, further on in the report (see page 196).<br />

<strong>Nipissing</strong> <strong>District</strong> <strong>Housing</strong> <strong>Needs</strong>, <strong>Supply</strong> & <strong>Affordability</strong> Study, May 2008. 5

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!