27.02.2015 Views

Open PDF - Self represented Litigants a challenge - Size 786 KB

Open PDF - Self represented Litigants a challenge - Size 786 KB

Open PDF - Self represented Litigants a challenge - Size 786 KB

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA<br />

3.6 Assistance during proceedings<br />

■<br />

What about an inquisitorial process once proceedings have begun?<br />

■<br />

■<br />

■<br />

■<br />

■<br />

■<br />

■<br />

■<br />

■<br />

■<br />

■<br />

■<br />

■<br />

■<br />

SRLS find it difficult when the other side is <strong>represented</strong>. Could include a<br />

lay adviser with social science background to assist the judge. Aim to<br />

preserve fairness. May be better than having a self-representing woman<br />

being cross-examined by the perpetrator of violence.<br />

Judicial officer would do the fact-finding. Would need an investigator<br />

attached to the Court – added to a more interventionist judge. With or<br />

without lawyers?<br />

A lot doesn’t happen until people get very close to trial, preparation for trial<br />

happens very late. This phase is very difficult.<br />

Develop a process to allow decisions on summary issues in a timely<br />

manner to allow clients to get on with their lives.<br />

Cutting lawyers out per se may be problematic because they play an<br />

important role in the process – provide guidance.<br />

Early conciliation conferences ought to be helpful.<br />

People with not much property to sort out need a summary decision<br />

process – some comment on FMS not being a good experience.<br />

Many don’t take notice of directions hearings and get around case<br />

management guidelines. People need to understand the benefit of<br />

preparing hearing documents well in advance.<br />

Canberra registry sends a letter out in advance which lists what has to be<br />

done before a hearing date will be allocated (trial notice). Matters then<br />

proceed on evidence filed, no matter what if one party has complied.<br />

Acknowledgement that there will never be a hearing in which every thing<br />

is before the court. This may need more explanation.<br />

Needs to be more uniformity across registries.<br />

Child representatives should be appointed early, family reports available on<br />

time.<br />

After conciliation processes are done, need better information before going<br />

to trial about what is involved.<br />

Should be noted that it is a disadvantage to be un<strong>represented</strong> in the current<br />

system.<br />

To change the system requires working with lawyers, not seeing them as<br />

part of the problem.<br />

40

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!