Open PDF - Self represented Litigants a challenge - Size 786 KB
Open PDF - Self represented Litigants a challenge - Size 786 KB
Open PDF - Self represented Litigants a challenge - Size 786 KB
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA<br />
PREFACE<br />
The Family Court of Australia was one of the first courts to recognise the<br />
<strong>challenge</strong> <strong>represented</strong> by the increasing numbers of litigants who, either by<br />
choice or necessity are self-<strong>represented</strong> in proceedings before it. As a<br />
consequence, the <strong>Self</strong>-<strong>represented</strong> <strong>Litigants</strong> - a Challenge project was set up.<br />
This project has now completed the first phase of its operations.<br />
At the beginning of the process the project determined that it should advance its<br />
activities in three main directions – Information, Collaboration and Innovation.<br />
These three headings corresponded in more colloquial terms to the <strong>challenge</strong> of<br />
getting self-representing litigants lawyers, making them lawyers or changing the<br />
system.<br />
Research undertaken in conjunction with and at the request of the Court has<br />
indicated that (in first instance) 30–40 per cent of the matters involve litigants<br />
who are self <strong>represented</strong> at some point. The analysis of this phenomenon and<br />
the development of strategies to meet the <strong>challenge</strong> have resulted in many<br />
initiatives which are reflected in this report.<br />
It was never expected and indeed cannot be expected that the Court will finish<br />
the process of designing and reforming its supply of information and procedures<br />
to take account of the changing face of litigation and the needs of those who are<br />
self-<strong>represented</strong>. So far we have made a substantial start and have recognised<br />
that this process involves much more than simply the handing out of a "kit" at the<br />
time of the hearing. It is rather the provision of relevant information in a<br />
comprehensible and comprehensive form at appropriate times during the<br />
proceedings. This is consistent with and supportive of the Court’s objectives to<br />
find the most appropriate way to resolve disputes.<br />
iv