27.02.2015 Views

Open PDF - Self represented Litigants a challenge - Size 786 KB

Open PDF - Self represented Litigants a challenge - Size 786 KB

Open PDF - Self represented Litigants a challenge - Size 786 KB

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Self</strong>-<strong>represented</strong> <strong>Litigants</strong> ~ A Challenge: PROJECT REPORT<br />

8 REPORT ON THE VISIONING WORKSHOP<br />

6 & 7 April 2002<br />

1 The project has broadly proceeded under three main streams:<br />

~ Information;<br />

~ Collaboration; and<br />

~ Innovation.<br />

2 The project has concentrated so far, principally upon the first of those two<br />

objectives. The third phase of the process involves the concept of bringing<br />

together those who could imaginatively contribute to the design of a system<br />

that would be fair, not only to self-<strong>represented</strong> litigants but also to those<br />

who are <strong>represented</strong> – a fair go for all.<br />

3 The first part of the process (which became the Visioning Workshop) was an<br />

opportunity for those with vision and imagination to put forward an ideal<br />

system to achieve the above objectives. Those ideas and that plan will be<br />

put before the Court to determine realistically how they might be<br />

implemented.<br />

4 Finally, whatever may have been accepted as the "real" model would be<br />

implemented incrementally in accordance with the Court’s broader<br />

objectives, plans and budget. This third phase would involve necessarily<br />

the recruiting of all relevant stakeholders to the validity of the plans and<br />

objectives.<br />

5 It was hoped that the first part of the process – the Visioning Workshop –<br />

would provide the outlines or a draft blueprint for the Court against which<br />

changes (either brought about by budgetary variations or dictated by<br />

circumstances) could be measured. It was also considered that it would be<br />

a vehicle for change in itself and would provide an impetus towards the<br />

implementation of reforms to produce a fairer go for all participants in the<br />

system. To that end the first part of the process was not to be constrained<br />

by the obviously realistic considerations of budget and staffing. The<br />

marrying of the ideal with reality was seen as the function of the second<br />

phase of the program. The third phase would refine that reality to<br />

accommodate the legitimate concerns of those who are stakeholders in the<br />

system.<br />

55

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!