15.03.2015 Views

The Eleventh Regional Wheat Workshop For Eastern ... - Cimmyt

The Eleventh Regional Wheat Workshop For Eastern ... - Cimmyt

The Eleventh Regional Wheat Workshop For Eastern ... - Cimmyt

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

On-farm analysis ofdurum wheat production technologies - Kenea et al.<br />

(Kilinto) or better than Boohai (Quami and Foka), while ET-13 was rated to be the least<br />

resistant. Maturity wise, Quami and Foka were rated to be late maturing followed by Boohai.<br />

ET -13 and Kilinto were rated to be equally early maturing ones.<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

This study revealed that there was no significant grain and straw yield differences between<br />

the new and check varieties. However, with respect to disease resistance, Boohai variety was<br />

reported to be susceptible to leaf rust disease (DZARC, 1996). This indicated that the new<br />

varieties are better than Boohai in their disease reaction and thus there is a need to replace<br />

Boohai with these resistant varieties. Farmers also rated the new varieties better in terms of<br />

disease resistance, grain quality for some local dishes, and straw quality for feed. Given these<br />

merits of the new varieties, demonstration and dissemination of the new varieties is<br />

commendable. Given the disease resistance, farmers' priority is, however, yield or income<br />

maximization, and other criteria are somewhat secondary as there are alternative means of<br />

coping with some of them. Farmers indicated that the new varieties are not better than the<br />

currently widely grown bread wheat varieties like Kubsa and Pavon. This difference is<br />

explained by the tetraploid nature of durum wheat, whose yield as a result is generally lower<br />

than bread wheat, which is a hexaploid. Although farmers expect that the new varieties will<br />

fetch the same price as other durum wheat varieties, which is often greater than the price paid<br />

for bread wheat in the domestic markets, this price advantage of the durum wheat varieties is,<br />

however, not sufficient to surpass the yield advantage of bread wheat. <strong>The</strong>refore, to ensure<br />

wider adoption of these varieties or durum wheat technologies in general, policies that<br />

improve the price margin for durum wheat need to be in order. One means is promoting<br />

strong horizontal linkage between the local processing industries and the farming sector.<br />

Until recently, this linkage is either non-existent or very weak, as most processing industries<br />

depend for their raw material need on imports from abroad. <strong>The</strong>re is lack of awareness by the<br />

local processing industries about the quality standard and for some even the availability of<br />

durum wheat in the domestic market. Thus, awareness creation through research product fairs<br />

for processing industries will play an essential role leading to increased demand in the local<br />

market.<br />

<strong>The</strong> study also revealed that with improved practice the hew varieties provided a grain and<br />

straw yield advantage and were economically more feasible cf. the local practice. As a result,<br />

demonstration of the improved practice is also commendable. However, as the results at<br />

Minjar and other locations further indicate the possible agronomic and economic feasibility<br />

of reduced and additional nitrogen, respectively, beyond the given experimental range, a<br />

further fine tuning study both on station and on farm to determine the optimum nitrogen<br />

fertilizer application is suggested.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

CIMMYT. 1988. From Agronomic Data to Farmer Recommendations: An Economic Training Manual.<br />

Completely Revised Edition. Mexico, D. F.: CIMMYT.<br />

Debre Zeit Agricultural Research Center (DZARC). 1997. AIIDual Research Report, 1994/95. Debre Zeit,<br />

Ethiopia.<br />

Debre Zeit Agricultural Research Center (DZARC). 1989. Annual Research Report, 1988/89. Debre Zeit,<br />

Ethiopia.<br />

Debre Zeit Agricultural Research Center (DZARC). 1996. Annual Research Report, 1993/94. Debre Zeit,<br />

Ethiopia.<br />

406

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!