Mid-term Review of the Diakonia Strategic Peace Building ... - Sida

4 C O N C L U S I O N S A N D R E C O M M E N D A T I O N S
Include clear links between conflict analysis and programming in these capacity
building plans.
Plan for greater time for conflict/context analysis during the partners’ meetings.
Define, in close collaboration with its partners, what a strategic peace building
programme is, what it consists of in terms of problems to address in the context
of Zimbabwe and in terms of relevant strategies to address them.
Strategically choose one or two problems to address through its programme
(Diakonia and its partners cannot address all the problems highlighted in the
conflict analysis). This choice will depend on the experience, knowledge of
the partners, of their capacity to demonstrate an added value in addressing
these problems.
Further assess its current portfolio as a whole, not only individual organisations,
and draw conclusions on needed capacity to address and have an influence
on the issues highlighted in the conflict analysis and/or on those that the
partners agree to address in priority during the coming two years.
Possibly change its current portfolio on the basis of the conclusions of the assessment
suggested above (on qualitative and not on quantitative criteria).
Implement its resource mobilisation strategy and share the results on a regular
basis with Sida/Embassy of Sweden in Harare.
35