16.11.2012 Views

Solar PV water pumping study - FINAL REPORT ... - UNDP, Namibia

Solar PV water pumping study - FINAL REPORT ... - UNDP, Namibia

Solar PV water pumping study - FINAL REPORT ... - UNDP, Namibia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Feasibility Assessment for the Replacement of Diesel Pumps with <strong>Solar</strong> Pumps<br />

3.1.2 Operating range<br />

<strong>FINAL</strong> <strong>REPORT</strong>: September 2006<br />

The <strong>study</strong> covers <strong>water</strong> supply systems that are able to deliver over a head of up to 200m<br />

with a maximum daily delivery of 60m 3 /day for the <strong>PV</strong>P option and a maximum hourly<br />

delivery of 12m 3 /h for the diesel <strong>pumping</strong> option.<br />

The head used in the calculations refers to the total dynamic head, and therefore includes<br />

the possible drawdown in the borehole.<br />

Comparing pumps is slightly more complex than comparing energy systems since a pump<br />

delivers a flowrate over a head depending on the array size whereas an energy system<br />

delivers energy (kWh/day) for a particular array size. A pump therefore has two parameters,<br />

flowrate and vertical lift. A useful comparison basis for pumps is therefore given by the value<br />

referred to as the daily hydraulic load. This is stated as:<br />

Daily hydraulic load [m 4 /day] = daily flowrate [m 3 /day] x head [m]<br />

In the ideal case this relationship is a constant. For example the hydraulic load at 50m head<br />

and 20m 3 /day is the same as the hydraulic load at 20m and 50m 3 /day, i.e. 1,000m 4 /day.<br />

Every <strong>PV</strong> pump reaches a particular hydraulic limit but that value depends on the maximum<br />

allowable array size and on the pump’s ability to meet the various heads at more or less<br />

constant efficiency. Examples of different constant hydraulic load are shown in Figure 3.2.<br />

Head [m]<br />

210<br />

180<br />

150<br />

120<br />

90<br />

60<br />

30<br />

0<br />

0 50 100 150 200 250 300<br />

Daily flow rate [m3/day]<br />

Figure 3.2: Example of hydraulic load graphs<br />

1,000m4/day<br />

2,000m4/day<br />

3,000m4/day<br />

In reality a <strong>PV</strong>P of fixed array size will not follow the line exactly because of increasing<br />

friction head (more losses) with deeper boreholes and due to variations in the characteristics<br />

of the specific pump used. Refer to Figure 2.1.<br />

The results of the costing analysis will make use of the constant hydraulic load line to<br />

indicate thresholds for different viabilities of <strong>PV</strong>Ps and diesel <strong>pumping</strong> ranges.<br />

3.1.3 Sizing<br />

In order to create a basis for comparison between <strong>PV</strong>Ps and DPs the performance of the<br />

<strong>pumping</strong> options are linked to dedicated delivery heads. These are:<br />

Page 16 of 76

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!