19.04.2015 Views

A report on an experiment I did of doing electrophoresis with proteins

A report on an experiment I did of doing electrophoresis with proteins

A report on an experiment I did of doing electrophoresis with proteins

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

15<br />

FIG. 18: The above graph shows the intensities <strong>of</strong> the Coomassie stains as a functi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> the scaled protein mass in arbitrary<br />

units al<strong>on</strong>g <strong>with</strong> <strong>an</strong> estimate <strong>of</strong> the errors in the intensities. This shows the problems <strong>of</strong> stalling at higher masses <strong>an</strong>d a sharp<br />

drop <strong>of</strong> the sensitivity at the lower ends. It also shows the best-fit straight line <strong>of</strong> 1.31932 × 10 6 x + 1.9090 × 10 6 that <strong>on</strong>e gets<br />

<strong>on</strong> dropping the lowest mass from the data.<br />

• A similar <strong>experiment</strong> as above was d<strong>on</strong>e <strong>with</strong> the protein BSA (Bovine Serum Albumin) <strong>an</strong>d this was commercially<br />

bought. Hence in this case c<strong>an</strong> know <strong>with</strong> greater c<strong>on</strong>fidence the amount <strong>of</strong> protein present in the sample<br />

but running <strong>of</strong> the gel gave spurious b<strong>an</strong>ds <strong>an</strong>d hence brought in the doubt that the commercial protein isn’t<br />

so pure.<br />

Further the staining data <strong>on</strong> BSA seemed to show some unnaturalness. Under the expectati<strong>on</strong> that the efficency<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>doing</strong> the <strong>experiment</strong> increases <strong>with</strong> time <strong>on</strong>ly the last 2 runs <strong>of</strong> <strong>doing</strong> <strong>electrophoresis</strong> <strong>on</strong> a diluti<strong>on</strong> series<br />

<strong>with</strong> the BSA are <str<strong>on</strong>g>report</str<strong>on</strong>g>ed in the follwing table <strong>an</strong>d taking two rect<strong>an</strong>gles from each gel as for Actin.<br />

Run <strong>an</strong>d selecti<strong>on</strong> 12µg 6µg 3µg 1.5µg 0.75µg 0.375µg<br />

BSA Gel 1, rect<strong>an</strong>gle 1 2.48778 × 10 6 2.44266 × 10 6 2.13022 × 10 6 2.01492 × 10 6 1.94225 × 10 6 1.62661 × 10 6<br />

BSA Gel 1, rect<strong>an</strong>gle 2 2.7648 × 10 6 2.78381 × 10 6 2.39877 × 10 6 2.29921 × 10 6 2.41803 × 10 6 1.82157 × 10 6<br />

BSA Gel 2, rect<strong>an</strong>gle 1 3.13856 × 10 6 2.87085 × 10 6 2.43379 × 10 6 2.4663 × 10 6 2.34672 × 10 6 2.06325 × 10 6<br />

BSA Gel 2, rect<strong>an</strong>gle 2 3.04063 × 10 6 2.83565 × 10 6 2.36599 × 10 6 2.39677 × 10 6 2.39455 × 10 6 1.90973 × 10 6<br />

Me<strong>an</strong>∼ 2.85794 × 10 6 2.73324 × 10 6 2.33219 × 10 6 2.2943 × 10 6 2.27539 × 10 6 1.85529 × 10 6<br />

St<strong>an</strong>dard Deviati<strong>on</strong> ∼ 253878.2709 170600.68982 119048.07566 171873.0588 194046.06649 157831.12494<br />

TABLE II: Intensities <strong>an</strong>d the averages <strong>an</strong>d the st<strong>an</strong>dard deviati<strong>on</strong>s for the same masses <strong>of</strong> BSA in various trials<br />

Fitting the functi<strong>on</strong> A x n<br />

n = 0.197972.<br />

<strong>on</strong> the above averaged points for BSA the values gotten are A = 2.95005 × 10 6 <strong>an</strong>d

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!