05.05.2015 Views

Prospects for Coal Briquettes as a Substitute Fuel for Wood and ...

Prospects for Coal Briquettes as a Substitute Fuel for Wood and ...

Prospects for Coal Briquettes as a Substitute Fuel for Wood and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

16<br />

<strong>and</strong> <strong>as</strong>h contents <strong>and</strong> high in fixed carbon that carbonization is<br />

unnecessary <strong>for</strong> a ,smoke1 ess fuel. Hwever, anthracites are re1 atively<br />

rare.<br />

E. THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH 3RIQUETTING PND CARBONIZING COAL<br />

INDICATE A SELLING PRICE FOR SNOKELESS COAL BRIQUETTES IN<br />

SOME URBAN AREAS THAT MAKE THEM CX)MPETITIVE W I T H FUELWOOD AND<br />

CHrnCQK.<br />

Fabuss <strong>and</strong> Tatm C6l estimate the costs of constructing a 100 metric ton<br />

par day (coal input) briquetting <strong>and</strong> carbonization plant <strong>for</strong> Pakistan.<br />

Whdfo this is a moderately sized plant <strong>and</strong> to a certaln extent tied to<br />

conditions found in Pakistanr a review of their estimates can give an<br />

idea of the econmic viabil ity of the coal brlquetting/carbonization<br />

techno1 ogy.<br />

The plant viwed in thelr scenario takes the path of an "intermediate<br />

technology." It would be capable of recovering the coal tar <strong>and</strong> oil,<br />

but none of the U~QUS liquors. The process off-g<strong>as</strong> would be used to<br />

generate 100% of the power rquirements <strong>for</strong> the plant. Uti1 izing<br />

Pakistan's high sulfur lignite coal, the briquettes would be <strong>for</strong>med<br />

without a binder, but 1 ime would have to be added prior to briquetting<br />

to reduce sul fur missions. The plant would have 66 tons per day output<br />

of mokel ess coal briquettes. The ratio of 100 tons per day coal input<br />

to 66 tons per day output of smokeless coal briquettes w<strong>as</strong> figured <strong>for</strong> a<br />

ticular Pakistani coalr <strong>and</strong> other coals would give varying yields.<br />

ever, the PO0 to 66 ratio is In the middle of a range of about 55% to<br />

75% that might be expected from various coals.<br />

Total investment costs, including the cost of installed equipment, site<br />

preparation, bui 1 di rigs, engi neeri ng <strong>and</strong> conti ngenci esa are put at<br />

2,130,000 U.S. dollars (1982$). About half of this amount would be<br />

rqui red tn <strong>for</strong>eign exchange. Operating co~ts, including coalr 1 ime,<br />

1 abor, mai ntenancep 1 oan reti r ent, a 25% prof it on these manufacturing<br />

costs, <strong>and</strong> transportation brlng the price of smokeles 1 briquettes<br />

to 1528 Pakistani rupees (Rs.) per metric ton of oil ival ent (TOE)<br />

anywhere within a one hundred mile radius of the plan By varying<br />

the scale of the plant, Fabuss <strong>and</strong> Tatcxn further estimate that the cost<br />

of smokeless coal briquettes per TOE would be Rs. 1622, Rs. 1466, <strong>and</strong><br />

Rs. 1407 <strong>for</strong> plants with coal inputs of 25, 300, <strong>and</strong> 1,000 metric tons<br />

(tonnes) per dayr respectively. 3y c parison, fir ood costs a87<br />

average of Rs. 2117/TOE. Thusl the coal briquetti ng/carbonination<br />

operation appears to be econcmical ly competitive, Moreover, this is the<br />

c<strong>as</strong>e without even considering the potential value of the coal tar byproduct.<br />

If a market <strong>for</strong> this can be found, wen if used only <strong>as</strong> boiler<br />

fuel, either plant profits could be raised or the price of the mokeless<br />

1/ In 1982 when the cost estimates were mader 1 US$ equalled<br />

approximately 12 Rs. In 1985, the exchange rate is approximately 1<br />

US$ t o 16 Rs.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!