05.05.2015 Views

Prospects for Coal Briquettes as a Substitute Fuel for Wood and ...

Prospects for Coal Briquettes as a Substitute Fuel for Wood and ...

Prospects for Coal Briquettes as a Substitute Fuel for Wood and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

19<br />

inner char is found that can be used <strong>as</strong> a smokeless fuel.<br />

such a process can be seen <strong>for</strong> miles.<br />

Smoke frm<br />

The major difference introduced by -:he different types of feed coal used<br />

in the industrial carbonization plants h<strong>as</strong> to do with briquetting. The<br />

bituminous <strong>and</strong> subbltuminous coals may only be crushed <strong>and</strong> sized, but<br />

not briquetted prior to carbonlzation. Hwever, briquetting of the coal<br />

or smokeless coal .fines may occur. <strong>Coal</strong> fines are briquetted with<br />

mol<strong>as</strong>ses, bentonite (clay), or an inorganic binder by the Indians. Soft<br />

coke fines may be briquetted with a starch binder. With the lignitic<br />

coal sp briquetting prior to carbonization is per<strong>for</strong>med. The producers<br />

take advantage of the property of 1 ignite that allows it to be<br />

briquetted without a binder. The briquetted <strong>for</strong>m of the smokeless coal<br />

output gives it a distinctive appearance. This allows it to be e<strong>as</strong>ily<br />

distinguished from lump coalr so that it cannot be adulterated by<br />

di shonest deal ers.<br />

Profitability of the village coal pile <strong>and</strong> intermediate technology<br />

producers is positive, if only marginal at times. Costs are reduced by<br />

avoiding capital investment to recover by-products. The high technol ogy<br />

producers must often operate unprofitably <strong>for</strong> seven, eight, or ten years<br />

be<strong>for</strong>e reaching the break-even poi nt. The di ff icul ties that pl ague the<br />

larger operations, in addition to higher costs, are irregular coal<br />

suppl ies, transportation difficulties, power outages, labor probl cans$<br />

<strong>and</strong> the inabil ity to sell by-products. A1 though high technol ogy<br />

appl ications may be more prof itable in the long-run, Schwartz <strong>and</strong> Tatom<br />

C161 recommend appl ication of intermed-l ate 1 eve1 s of technol ogy with<br />

some by-product recovery <strong>for</strong> other developing countries. In this<br />

f<strong>as</strong>hion, sane of the risk of high technology plants <strong>as</strong> well <strong>as</strong> the<br />

pol 1 ution probl ems of vent? ng by-products can be avoided.<br />

B. INDIA HAS DEVELOPED A SMOKELESS COOKING STOVE WHICH CAN USE<br />

RAW COAL AS A FUEL SOURCE WITH NO DETRIMENTAL HEALTH EFFECTS.<br />

Finally, a technology unique unto itself h<strong>as</strong> arisen fran the Indian<br />

experience. Thls is the %smokeless cooking stove,'! which u5es raw coal<br />

rather than smokeless coal <strong>as</strong> its initial fuel. It there<strong>for</strong>e cmpletely<br />

avoids the cost of coal carbonization plants. Developed by the Indian<br />

Central <strong>Fuel</strong> Research Institute (CFRI), the stove can be manufactured<br />

<strong>for</strong> about 50 rupees (soft coke stoves cost approximately 30 rupee+--1982<br />

rupees). B<strong>as</strong>ed on the savings of buying coal rather than smokeless<br />

coal, the cost of the stove can be rfxovered in only a few months. This<br />

Is b<strong>as</strong>ed on a 1982 retail coal price in India of about 180 rupees per<br />

tonne <strong>and</strong> the soft coke cost of about 720 rupees per tonne. Assuming a<br />

family of five, which would use about a tonne of soft coke per year., a

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!