Odour Threshold Investigation 2012 - Bay of Plenty Regional Council
Odour Threshold Investigation 2012 - Bay of Plenty Regional Council
Odour Threshold Investigation 2012 - Bay of Plenty Regional Council
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Figure 7.7<br />
Example <strong>of</strong> incomplete rounds (Panellists 3 and 5) with individual<br />
thresholds still being determined upon “completion” <strong>of</strong> the round.<br />
It can be seen from the top left portion <strong>of</strong> the datasheet that Panellist #3 had<br />
attained a single 6 entry when the test was stopped, and it would be reasonable to<br />
expect him/her to follow up with another 6, based on the prior inkling/certain pattern<br />
recorded. However for Panellist #5 the situation is less obvious. It was decided to<br />
exclude these types <strong>of</strong> results from the analysis. For untrained panellists two correct<br />
inklings indicates that they detect it but still lack some confidence.<br />
To remove conservatism, panellists that finished the round with either <strong>of</strong> the two<br />
scenarios discussed above have been excluded from the following analysis<br />
(Figure 7.8). 79% <strong>of</strong> the Rotorua panellists showed results whereby the round didn’t<br />
finish with two correct identifications <strong>of</strong> the presented gas hence showing a high<br />
level <strong>of</strong> insensitivity. For the Whakatāne group, 43% <strong>of</strong> the panellists showed this<br />
pattern <strong>of</strong> not being able to successfully finish a round.<br />
38 Environmental Publication <strong>2012</strong>/06–A review <strong>of</strong> odour properties <strong>of</strong> H 2 S <strong>Odour</strong> <strong>Threshold</strong> <strong>Investigation</strong> <strong>2012</strong>