Odour Threshold Investigation 2012 - Bay of Plenty Regional Council
Odour Threshold Investigation 2012 - Bay of Plenty Regional Council
Odour Threshold Investigation 2012 - Bay of Plenty Regional Council
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Figure 3<br />
Effects by panellist.<br />
Transforming the data<br />
It is convenient to use analysis <strong>of</strong> variance (ANOVA) to quantify the variability <strong>of</strong> threshold<br />
values between sessions, panellists and locations. Anova works well if underlying variation is<br />
approximately normally distributed and if the standard deviations <strong>of</strong> the approximating normal<br />
curves are roughly equal. Otherwise the anova estimates are likely to be unreliable. The<br />
detection threshold data in untransformed scale does not satisfy this requirement, which is<br />
common for this sort <strong>of</strong> measurement. Working with logged data, however, improves the<br />
“diagnostics” a great deal as shown in the rather technical figs 4 and 5. They show “residual<br />
analysis” for the raw data and then the logged data. The skewed shape and variable SD is<br />
corrected. We can still draw conclusions (with care) about the problem in the original scale.<br />
64 Environmental Publication <strong>2012</strong>/06–A review <strong>of</strong> odour properties <strong>of</strong> H 2 S <strong>Odour</strong> <strong>Threshold</strong> <strong>Investigation</strong> <strong>2012</strong>