May-2015
May-2015
May-2015
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
AUDITING<br />
EXPLORING<br />
MISSTATEMENTS<br />
The proposed audit-model is simple, adoptable and<br />
innovative by applying indispensable statistical tools<br />
such as normal distribution to facilitate the cost auditor to<br />
derive his results on substantial testing<br />
CMA Dr. L Kailasam<br />
Dy. Accountant General,<br />
Office of the<br />
Principal Accountant<br />
General (GSSA)<br />
Thiruvananthapuram<br />
THE examination and evaluation of<br />
financial objectionable cost misstatements<br />
among several thousands<br />
of the transactions is a herculean task.<br />
In many circumstances, verification of each<br />
and every transaction is practically impossible,<br />
as it requires lot of resources and time.<br />
Therefore, cost auditor necessarily to adopt<br />
appropriate sampling method, for deriving<br />
his results when one hundred percent of<br />
transactions within particular class of transactions<br />
or accounting balance could not be<br />
verified by him for expressing his opinion.<br />
There are two major concerns for the cost<br />
auditor, who is applying statistical sampling.<br />
One being the cost auditor has to estimate<br />
how many samples to be selected and another<br />
being what are those samples for the detailed<br />
examination.<br />
Heimann & Chesley (1977) 1 developed an<br />
audit sampling model by taking into consideration<br />
of various types of sampling risks. The<br />
model is useful in calculating the total cost<br />
that has to be incurred for auditing samples<br />
as well as to determine the alpha and beta risk<br />
levels. He pointed out that the classical statistical<br />
approach involves the use of the mean<br />
value estimator.<br />
However, the mean-value estimator ignores<br />
some important additional information<br />
that the cost auditor would have used during<br />
audit sampling such as the actual recoded<br />
value of an account balance. Therefore, O´<br />
Regan (2010) 2 suggested that the cost auditor<br />
have to consider confidence level, expected<br />
deviation rate, tolerance rate and population<br />
to determine the sample size.<br />
However, no attempt was made so far to<br />
link the sample interval and the corresponding<br />
population interval for getting adequate<br />
additional samples for deriving useful conclusions<br />
on materiality and hence a preliminary<br />
attempt is made to develop an audit model<br />
to derive scientific results on the substantial<br />
testing with least efforts.<br />
The proposed audit-model is simple, adoptable<br />
and innovative by applying indispensable<br />
statistical tools such as normal distribution<br />
to facilitate the cost auditor to derive his<br />
results on substantial testing. As in the case of<br />
any audit-sampling model, the proposed audit<br />
model also involves planning, performing<br />
and evaluation of audit samples. The professional<br />
judgment in planning, performing and<br />
evaluating sample and corroborating with<br />
1 Heimann,S.R.,& Chesley,G.R.(1977).Audit Sample Sizes for<br />
Aggregated Statement Accounts. Journal of Accounting<br />
Research,15(2),193-206<br />
2 O´Regan,D.(2010).Attribute Sampling Plans. Internal Auditor,<br />
67(1),19-21.<br />
www.icmai.in<br />
MAY <strong>2015</strong> the MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTANT 55