08.05.2015 Views

May-2015

May-2015

May-2015

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

AUDITING<br />

EXPLORING<br />

MISSTATEMENTS<br />

The proposed audit-model is simple, adoptable and<br />

innovative by applying indispensable statistical tools<br />

such as normal distribution to facilitate the cost auditor to<br />

derive his results on substantial testing<br />

CMA Dr. L Kailasam<br />

Dy. Accountant General,<br />

Office of the<br />

Principal Accountant<br />

General (GSSA)<br />

Thiruvananthapuram<br />

THE examination and evaluation of<br />

financial objectionable cost misstatements<br />

among several thousands<br />

of the transactions is a herculean task.<br />

In many circumstances, verification of each<br />

and every transaction is practically impossible,<br />

as it requires lot of resources and time.<br />

Therefore, cost auditor necessarily to adopt<br />

appropriate sampling method, for deriving<br />

his results when one hundred percent of<br />

transactions within particular class of transactions<br />

or accounting balance could not be<br />

verified by him for expressing his opinion.<br />

There are two major concerns for the cost<br />

auditor, who is applying statistical sampling.<br />

One being the cost auditor has to estimate<br />

how many samples to be selected and another<br />

being what are those samples for the detailed<br />

examination.<br />

Heimann & Chesley (1977) 1 developed an<br />

audit sampling model by taking into consideration<br />

of various types of sampling risks. The<br />

model is useful in calculating the total cost<br />

that has to be incurred for auditing samples<br />

as well as to determine the alpha and beta risk<br />

levels. He pointed out that the classical statistical<br />

approach involves the use of the mean<br />

value estimator.<br />

However, the mean-value estimator ignores<br />

some important additional information<br />

that the cost auditor would have used during<br />

audit sampling such as the actual recoded<br />

value of an account balance. Therefore, O´<br />

Regan (2010) 2 suggested that the cost auditor<br />

have to consider confidence level, expected<br />

deviation rate, tolerance rate and population<br />

to determine the sample size.<br />

However, no attempt was made so far to<br />

link the sample interval and the corresponding<br />

population interval for getting adequate<br />

additional samples for deriving useful conclusions<br />

on materiality and hence a preliminary<br />

attempt is made to develop an audit model<br />

to derive scientific results on the substantial<br />

testing with least efforts.<br />

The proposed audit-model is simple, adoptable<br />

and innovative by applying indispensable<br />

statistical tools such as normal distribution<br />

to facilitate the cost auditor to derive his<br />

results on substantial testing. As in the case of<br />

any audit-sampling model, the proposed audit<br />

model also involves planning, performing<br />

and evaluation of audit samples. The professional<br />

judgment in planning, performing and<br />

evaluating sample and corroborating with<br />

1 Heimann,S.R.,& Chesley,G.R.(1977).Audit Sample Sizes for<br />

Aggregated Statement Accounts. Journal of Accounting<br />

Research,15(2),193-206<br />

2 O´Regan,D.(2010).Attribute Sampling Plans. Internal Auditor,<br />

67(1),19-21.<br />

www.icmai.in<br />

MAY <strong>2015</strong> the MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTANT 55

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!