08.05.2015 Views

May-2015

May-2015

May-2015

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

AUDITING<br />

products. Similarly, an incentive scheme that does<br />

not provide an incentive unless a stretched target is<br />

achieved and provides significant bonus for achieving<br />

results (say, production and sales) higher than the target<br />

creates stress on internal controls. Therefore, internal<br />

audit focuses on sales return and complaints on product<br />

quality (as quality may be compromised to achieve<br />

and surpass the target), particularly in years of subdued<br />

demand for the product.<br />

The debate on whether the internal audit should<br />

work with or around ERM is yet to be settled. The<br />

main reason that has triggered this debate is that many<br />

firms are yet to establish a fully blown up ERM system.<br />

In an ERM system that has attained high maturity<br />

level, every decision-maker understands the risk-appetite<br />

established by the Board and risk management<br />

is embedded in decision-making. At a low maturity<br />

level, risks are managed in silos and enterprise-wide<br />

approach is absent. This has serious implications. Managers<br />

lack understanding of the risk appetite and the<br />

firm fails to develop risk-culture 9 . When risks are managed<br />

in silos, the combined impact of different risks in<br />

different segments are not assessed, and as a result the<br />

firm is exposed to high risks that deserve significant<br />

management attention. The concept of optimising<br />

‘portfolio of risks’ 10 cannot be implemented resulting<br />

in difficulties in formulating risk strategy.<br />

In view of different maturity levels of ERM systems<br />

that the internal auditor encounters, a pragmatic approach,<br />

although not the ideal solution, is to participate<br />

in establishing the ERM system in a firm where<br />

ERM system is at a low-maturity level and to plan<br />

audit around the ERM system where ERM system has<br />

attained a high maturity level.<br />

Internal Audit With ERM<br />

Internal auditor, because of the nature of his work,<br />

develops a clear understanding of risks that the firm is<br />

exposed to. Therefore, he is in the best position to support<br />

developing the ERM system. In the initial years<br />

of developing the ERM system, the internal auditor<br />

may get directly involved in identifying risks, assessing<br />

their impact, and developing risk responses(treatment)<br />

and designing controls, all in collaboration with<br />

managers. Although, this process has the danger of<br />

9 Risk culture refers to shared-understanding of risks.<br />

1O ptimising ‘Portfolio of risks’ refers to the optimization of overall risks to which<br />

the firm is exposed, taking into account risks retained by different segments and<br />

strengths of various controls.<br />

obscuring audit objectivity in audit of controls and<br />

other components of the ERM system, the benefits<br />

are more than the costs. Involvement of the internal<br />

auditor helps accelerating the process of developing<br />

the ERM system and achieving high level of maturity.<br />

The internal auditor can champion the ERM and help<br />

in developing the risk culture much better and faster<br />

than any other actor because of his understanding<br />

of business and risks, relationship with managers at all<br />

levels and superior communication skills. Of course,<br />

this is true, only when the internal auditor could build<br />

his image as a ‘friend, philosopher and guide’ and not<br />

as one who carries the policing function, and when<br />

the internal audit occupies a place of respect in the<br />

organisation.<br />

Internal Audit Around ERM<br />

In an ERM environment, the internal auditor aims<br />

to provide an assurance that the ERM system is adequate<br />

and operating effectively. Therefore, he should<br />

test the whole process by using random sampling<br />

technique. He should audit selected decisions to test<br />

whether risk management is embedded in decision<br />

models and whether decision-makers have understood<br />

the risk-appetite correctly. He evaluates the risk-identification<br />

and impact assessment process by using the<br />

interview technique, that is, by interviewing managers<br />

for collecting evidence (information). He also<br />

evaluates whether risk responses, including mitigation<br />

plans, are in sync with the risk strategy and whether<br />

they have been implemented effectively.<br />

Social audit<br />

Social Impact of Business<br />

Social audit refers to the audit of the social impact<br />

of the strategy and operations of the firm. A firm’s<br />

business has positive social impacts, for example, employment<br />

generation, augmentation of economic activities<br />

around firm’s facilities resulting in community<br />

development through increase in purchasing power<br />

and development of social infrastructure. Firm’s products<br />

and services may also have positive social impact.<br />

For example, when accompany makes hygiene products<br />

available at an affordable price to those who are at<br />

the ‘bottom of the pyramid’, it helps building hygiene<br />

culture and developing healthy communities. Other<br />

business strategies might also have positive impact. For<br />

example, Hindustan Unilever Limited’s ‘shaktiamma’<br />

project, which aims at achieving low-cost penetration<br />

66 the MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTANT MAY <strong>2015</strong><br />

www.icmai.in

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!