08.05.2015 Views

May-2015

May-2015

May-2015

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

AUDITING<br />

Internal audit objectives and scope<br />

Legal Provision<br />

Internal audit has emerged as an important function<br />

that supports corporate governance. Perhaps that is the<br />

reason why the Companies Act 2013 (Act) has mandated<br />

appointment of internal auditor in certain classes<br />

of companies. Section 138 of the Act and Rules<br />

framed there under requires the following classes of<br />

companies to appoint an internal auditor or a firm of<br />

internal auditors:<br />

• Every listed company;<br />

• Every unlisted public company having paid up share<br />

capital of fifty crore rupees or more; or turnover of two<br />

hundred crore rupees or more; or outstanding loans or<br />

borrowings from banks or public financial institutions<br />

exceeding one hundred crore rupees; or outstanding<br />

deposit of twenty five crore rupees; and<br />

• Every private company having turnover of two hundred<br />

crore rupees or more; or outstanding loans or<br />

borrowings from banks or public financial institutions<br />

exceeding one hundred crore rupees<br />

The Act stipulates that the internal auditor shall either<br />

be a chartered accountant or a cost accountant,<br />

or such other professional as the Board may decide. It<br />

further stipulates that the internal auditor may or may<br />

not be an employee of the company. It requires that<br />

the Audit Committee or the Board shall, in consultation<br />

with the internal auditor, formulate the scope,<br />

functioning, periodicity and methodology for conducting<br />

the internal audit.<br />

Nature of Internal Audit<br />

Internal audit, like any other audit, is primarily an assurance<br />

service. It is unique, as it has a component<br />

of consulting, which no other audit has. It is internal<br />

in the sense that it aims to support the management<br />

and the Board achieving the company’s purpose and<br />

strategic objectives. The main differences between the<br />

external financial audit (often referred as ‘statutory audit’<br />

as the law mandates the audit) and internal audit is<br />

that the financial auditor reports to shareholders, while<br />

the internal auditor reports to either the management<br />

or the Board; and while the scope of the external audit<br />

is defined by the statute (Companies Act 2013),<br />

the scope of internal audit is decided by the Audit<br />

Committee, a sub-committee of the Board. Another<br />

difference, which is not as evident as the above two<br />

differences, is that some of the procedures and techniques<br />

that the internal auditor uses are additional and<br />

different from the those that are being used by the<br />

external financial auditor.<br />

Internal Audit Objectives<br />

In a competitive environment all companies cannot be<br />

the leaders. There would be laggards as well. However,<br />

a company that develops appropriate strategy, executes<br />

it well, and re-invents itself on the face of changing environment<br />

survives and achieves its purpose and strategic<br />

objectives 1 , if not fully, to a great extent. Strategic<br />

objectives cascade into operational objectives 2 , compliance<br />

objectives 3 and reporting objectives 4 . Internal<br />

audit helps the management and the Board achieving<br />

the company’s purpose, strategic objectives and other<br />

subordinate objectives. Therefore, the scope of internal<br />

audit is much wider than the external financial audit,<br />

which aims to provide reasonable assurance to shareholders<br />

that the financial statements provides a true<br />

and fair view of the financial position at the balance<br />

sheet date, and profit or loss and cash flows for the<br />

reporting period.<br />

Internal Audit Scope<br />

Internal audit is often said to be ‘control of controls’<br />

because it provides a reasonable assurance that the controls<br />

established by the management are adequate and<br />

operating effectively. Management establishes control<br />

to mitigate risks that are retained by the firm, as a strategy<br />

or because those risks could not be avoided. The<br />

internal auditor evaluates controls in the context of<br />

changing internal and external environment to provide<br />

an assurance that controls are adequate. Assessing<br />

the adequacy of controls also involves evaluating the<br />

enterprise risk management (ERM) process to provide<br />

an assurance that risks have been identified properly,<br />

their impact has been assessed correctly and that risk<br />

responses have been designed based on the risk-appetite<br />

(acceptable risk level) established by the Board<br />

and to support the current strategy of the company.<br />

Ensuring that the controls are operating effectively<br />

is the responsibility of concerned managers. Internal<br />

audit monitors effectiveness of controls from an outsider’s<br />

perspective to provide an objective appraisal of<br />

1 Strategic objectives are high-level goals, aligning with and supporting the<br />

mission of the firm. Mission defines the core purpose of the firm.<br />

2 Operational objectives are specific targets for effective and efficient use of<br />

resources to achieve strategic objectives.<br />

3 Compliance objectives refer to goals for achieving compliance with applicable,<br />

laws, regulations and internal policies.<br />

4 Reporting objectives refer to goals for achieving reliability of internal and external<br />

reporting.<br />

64 the MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTANT MAY <strong>2015</strong><br />

www.icmai.in

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!