The Conflict in Sri Lanka: Ground Realities - Ilankai Tamil Sangam
The Conflict in Sri Lanka: Ground Realities - Ilankai Tamil Sangam
The Conflict in Sri Lanka: Ground Realities - Ilankai Tamil Sangam
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Is Peace Feasible?<br />
- Wakeley Paul<br />
[Wakely Paul po<strong>in</strong>ts out that the S<strong>in</strong>halese owned press realis<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the total unacceptability of Mr Rajapakse’s unrealistic <strong>in</strong>sistence<br />
on reta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the Unitary Constitution recommend sleazy duplicitous<br />
courses of action to follow. <strong>The</strong> whole focus on Federalism” is<br />
farcical for Federalism can only succeed if the parties trust each<br />
other. It should be obvious to anyone, judg<strong>in</strong>g from statements<br />
from both sides, that neither side trusts the other. He argues that<br />
unless the <strong>Sri</strong> <strong>Lanka</strong>n Government comes to grips with reality, and<br />
face the fact that the North east must be free of their stifl<strong>in</strong>g and<br />
unwelcome dom<strong>in</strong>ation, war is <strong>in</strong>evitable]<br />
Stunned that Mr Pirapakaran controlled the result of the<br />
Presidential Election, the S<strong>in</strong>halese owned press have reacted<br />
with articles and editorials seasoned with resentment as well as<br />
concern. Realis<strong>in</strong>g the total unacceptability of Mr Rajapakse’s<br />
unrealistic <strong>in</strong>sistence on reta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the Unitary Constitution, they<br />
recommend sleazy duplicitous courses of action for him to follow.<br />
<strong>The</strong> unitary constitution and a united nation<br />
<strong>The</strong>y suggest that Rajapakse publicly renounce his election<br />
platform by abandon<strong>in</strong>g his policy about the importance and<br />
sanctity of ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the Unitary Constitution. <strong>The</strong>y suggest<br />
that he carefully shift his position <strong>in</strong> order to conv<strong>in</strong>ce the<br />
<strong>in</strong>ternational community that peace, not the Unitary Constitution,<br />
is his number one priority. <strong>The</strong>y advise that he pretend to<br />
the <strong>in</strong>ternational community that he is ready for peace talks<br />
by talk<strong>in</strong>g of a united nation <strong>in</strong>stead of <strong>in</strong>sist<strong>in</strong>g on a Unitary<br />
Constitution.<br />
Is there really any difference between the two?<br />
<strong>The</strong> press hope that the <strong>in</strong>ternational community, with their<br />
bl<strong>in</strong>ded opposition to a separate state, will be attracted by this<br />
change <strong>in</strong> term<strong>in</strong>ology. By this approach, they hope to accomplish<br />
7