21.05.2015 Views

ISNVD Abstract Book

ISNVD Abstract Book

ISNVD Abstract Book

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The 2 nd Annual <strong>ISNVD</strong> Scientific Meeting<br />

February 18–22 th 2012 Orlando, Florida, USA<br />

Catheter venography for the assessment of internal jugular veins and<br />

azygous vein – consensus document<br />

Contrary to some well-recognized venous territories, relatively little is known about anatomy,<br />

physiological flow and hemodynamics in the internal jugular veins. Even less is known about the<br />

azygous vein. Consequently, catheter angiography and interpretation is currently performed according<br />

to the rules governing examination of other veins. Still, differences exist between techniques and<br />

interpretation amongst centers. Since our knowledge about anatomy and physiology of veins that may<br />

play a role in pathophysiology of neurological disorders (especially: multiple sclerosis) in the setting<br />

of the so-called chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency (CCSVI) is at its infancy, there are many<br />

problems that should be addressed.<br />

1. Vascular access.<br />

Most venographies are currently performed through femoral access. Access through an upper<br />

extremity vein is a theoretical option in the case of agenesis of inferior vena cava. A direct puncture of<br />

the internal jugular vein can also be used, but can be technically challenging if such a vein is<br />

hypoplastic or collapsed. Thus, femoral access is the preferred route. However, there are some issues,<br />

which need to be considered when using femoral access.<br />

Firstly, the pressure measurement in the internal jugular vein may not be reliable (jugular valve is<br />

potentially kept open by the diagnostic catheter – hypothetically reducing or eliminating any crossvalve<br />

pressure differential). Options may include using a smaller caliber device such as a pressuresensing<br />

wire, which is less disruptive to valves or for accurate pressure measurement direct jugular<br />

access could be considered.<br />

Secondly, there is discussion about which femoral vein (right or left), should be punctured. Insertion<br />

of the catheter through the left femoral vein allows a much easier assessment of left iliac vein (May-<br />

Thurner syndrome), the ascending lumbar veins and the left renal vein (Nutcracker syndrome). On the<br />

other hand, access through right femoral vein makes access and angioplasty of the left internal jugular<br />

and azygous veins much easier particularly in the case of tortuous iliac and left brachiocephalic veins.<br />

In addition, there is currently no evidence to support angioplasty of asymptomatic stenosis of the left<br />

iliac or left renal vein, thus a potential benefit from left femoral access is not clear. We therefore<br />

recommend right femoral vein access for routine assessment of the internal jugular and azygous veins<br />

and possible consideration of angioplasty. Left femoral vein access may be an option if the screening<br />

of additional veins, such as left iliac vein is planned.<br />

2. Angiographic contrast.<br />

Angiographic contrast may be used diluted (1:1) or non-diluted. Diluted contrast allows better<br />

visualization of endoluminal structures (valve leaflets, webs, etc.). However, non-diluted contrast<br />

allows better opacification of epidural and other collaterals as well as better estimation of overall<br />

features of veins particularly stenosis.<br />

There is no clear consensus on whether contrast should be hand or pressure injected. Hand injections<br />

are performed using smaller volumes of contrast under lower pressure. Pressure injectors are higher

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!