21.05.2015 Views

ISNVD Abstract Book

ISNVD Abstract Book

ISNVD Abstract Book

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>ISNVD</strong> Consensus On Ultrasound<br />

Chronic Cerebrospinal Venous<br />

Insufficiency Screening Criteria<br />

MOROVIC 1,2 S, MENEGATTI 1 E, VISELNER 3 G, NICOLAIDES 4 AN, ZAMBONI 1 P<br />

The Intersociety Faculty*<br />

1<br />

Vascular Diseases Center, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy; 2 Dept. of Neurology, UHC Sestre milosrdnice Zagreb, Croatia; 3 Neurological Institute Mondino,<br />

University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy; 4 Vascular Screening and Diagnostic Centre, Cyprus<br />

Chronic Cerebrospinal Venous Insufficiency (CCSVI) is a syndrome<br />

characterized by stenoses or obstructions of the internal jugular vein<br />

(IJV) and/or azygos veins (AZV) with disturbed flow and formation of<br />

collateral venous channels. Most common venous lesions are truncular<br />

vascular malformations (intraluminal defects, segmental hypoplasia).<br />

In order to ensure a high reproducibility of duplex scanning with<br />

comparable accuracy between centres, recommendations with a detailed<br />

protocol, standard methodology, and criteria have been proposed.<br />

Even though considered a gold standard for determining the anatomical site,<br />

type and extent of lesions producing CCSVI, catheter venography is invasive<br />

and cannot be used as a screening method. Ultrasound is therefore an ideal<br />

screening tool; it is non-invasive, can be performed at beside, and allows a<br />

real-time assessment of venous status. It is a valuable diagnostic test since<br />

high sensitivity and specificity have been demonstrated, in presence of<br />

which, catheter venography will only be needed when a decision has already<br />

been made for intervention.<br />

During a Consensus Meeting, on March 13 th 2011, at the 1 st <strong>ISNVD</strong> Meeting in Bologna, Italy, experts agreed on protocol recommendations for CCSVI<br />

screening criteria using ultrasound. At least two criteria have to be positive for a diagnosis of CCSVI to be considered.<br />

The new, revised and accepted criteria are:<br />

1. A) Bidirectional flow in one or both of the IJVs in both postures, or bidirectional flow in one position with absence of flow in the other<br />

position and/or B) reversal or bidirectional flow in one or both vertebral veins (VVs) in both positions.<br />

Normal flow with insignificant reflux less than 0.2<br />

sec.<br />

Reflux of 0.4 sec duration.<br />

Reflux of 0.84 sec duration.<br />

2. Bidirectional flow in the intracranial veins and sinuses. (An additional criterion)<br />

Bidirectional flow in the IJV seen in longitudinal<br />

view. Red color indicated reflux.<br />

*International Society for Neurovascular<br />

Diseases (<strong>ISNVD</strong>) in cooperation with<br />

International Union of Angiology (IUA), European<br />

Venous Forum (EVF), International Union of<br />

Phlebology (UIP), American College of Phlebology<br />

(ACP), Austral- Asian College of Phlebology<br />

(AAsCP), Società Italiana di Chirurgia Vascolare<br />

ed Endovascolare (SICVE), Società Italiana di<br />

Angiologia e Patologia Apparato Vascolare<br />

(SIAPAV)<br />

*Faculty: D. Neuhardt (USA)-ACP representative;<br />

M. B. Griffin (UK)-EVF representative; C. Setacci<br />

(Italy)-SICVE representative; A. Cavezzi (Italy)-<br />

UIP representative; B. B: Lee (USA)-IUA<br />

representative; P. Thibault (Australia)-AAsCP<br />

representative; G. Andreozzi (Italy)-SIAPAV<br />

representative; M. Al-Omari (Jordan); S.<br />

Bastianello (Italy); C. B. Beggs (UK); P. Cecconi<br />

(Italy); V. Demarin (Croatia); C. Franceschi<br />

(France); A. Galassi (Italy); E. M. Haacke (USA);<br />

A. Lagace (Canada); N. Liasis (Greece); T. Ludyga<br />

(Poland); M. Lugli (Italy); O. Maleti (Italy); M.<br />

Mancini (Italy); M. Marioni (Italy); K. Marr (USA);<br />

S. McDonald (Canada); N. Morrison (USA); S.<br />

Sclafani (USA); A. Scuderi (Brasil); S. Shepherd<br />

(UK); M. Simka (Poland); A. Stella (Italy); R.<br />

Zivadinov (USA).<br />

Visualization of the Power<br />

Doppler signal (instead of<br />

Color Doppler for an<br />

increased spatial resolution)<br />

of the Superior Petrosal<br />

Sinus (1), Inferior Petrosal<br />

Sinus (2), contralateral<br />

Inferior Petrosal Sinus (3)<br />

and (partially) contralateral<br />

Superior Petrosal Sinus (4),<br />

from the Transcaranial<br />

window at the level of the<br />

condyloid process of the<br />

mandible.<br />

Example of Reflux: the blood flow at the<br />

level of the Superior Petrosal Sinus<br />

(SPS) shows opposite directions<br />

between inspiration and expiration; this<br />

finding shows the presence of reversed<br />

blood flow within the examined vessel<br />

between the two phases of respiration.<br />

The blood flow direction of the Inferior<br />

Petrosal Sinus (IPS) is not detectable<br />

during Expiration. The blood flow<br />

direction of the Contralateral Inferior<br />

Petrosal Sinus (CIPS) is not detectable<br />

during Inspiration and Expiration<br />

Example of No Reflux: the blood<br />

flow at the level of the Superior<br />

Petrosal Sinus (SPS) shows the<br />

same direction between<br />

inspiration and expiration; the<br />

blood flow direction of the Inferior<br />

Petrosal Sinus (IPS) is not<br />

detectable during Expiration; the<br />

blood flow direction of the<br />

Contralateral Inferior Petrosal<br />

Sinus (CIPS) is not detectable<br />

during Inspiration and Expiration<br />

3. A) Reduction of IJV cross sectional area (CSA) in supine position to ≤0.3 cm 2 which does not increase with Valsalva manoeuvre<br />

(performed at the end of the examination) and/or B) Intraluminal defects such as flaps, septa or malformed valves combined with<br />

hemodynamic changes (block, reflux, increased blood flow velocity). Valve leaflet/s immobility confirmed by M-mode.<br />

membrane<br />

CSA reduction to ≤0.3 cm2<br />

Intraluminal defect-B mode<br />

M-mode evaluation of jugular valve showing<br />

mobility of the leaflets (arrow).<br />

Valve leaflets immobility demonstrated in M-<br />

mode (arrow).<br />

4. A) Absence of detectable flow in<br />

the IJV and/or VV, despite numerous<br />

deep inspirations, in both sitting and<br />

upright positions, or B) In one<br />

posture absence of detectable flow in<br />

IJV and/or VV, despite numerous<br />

deep inspirations and bidirectional<br />

flow detected in the other position,<br />

same side.<br />

Absence of detectable flow in longitudinal scan<br />

of an IJV in supine posture.<br />

5. A) CSA of the IJV is greater in the sitting position than in the lying<br />

position or B) Appears almost unchanged despite change in posture.<br />

All measurements should be performed on both sides, and in<br />

the sitting and lying position. Criteria 1 and 4 are positive<br />

only if present in both positions.<br />

Example of Cross Sectional Area (CSA)<br />

measurement of the IJV in supine position.<br />

Example of Cross Sectional Area (CSA)<br />

measurement of the IJV in sitting position<br />

Performance of CCSVI screening, by following these recommendations ensures a high<br />

comparable accuracy between centres.<br />

reproducibility of duplex scanning with

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!