21.05.2015 Views

ISNVD Abstract Book

ISNVD Abstract Book

ISNVD Abstract Book

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

FLOW THROUGH THE INTERNAL JUGULAR VEIN IS REDUCED<br />

FOR MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS PATIENTS WITH STENOSES<br />

COMPARED TO THOSE WITHOUT OBSERVED BY MRI<br />

W. Feng 1 , D. Utriainen 2 , Z. Wu 3 , D. Hubbard 4 , E. M. Haacke 1,2<br />

1<br />

Department of Radiology, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan 48201; 2 Magnetic Resonance Innovations, Inc., Detroit, MI 48202;<br />

3<br />

Department of Surgery, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, 30310; 4 Applied fMRI Institute, San Diego, CA 92131<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

Chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency (CCSVI) has been suggested to play an important role in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients [1]. Studies of venous flow of MS patients<br />

were mostly performed with ultrasound imaging. Our recent work using contrast enhanced MRA (CE-MRA), 2D time-of-flight MRV (TOF-MRV) and phase contrast MRI (PC-<br />

MRI) has shown that the internal jugular vein (IJV) flow at the cervical 6 (C6) level is reduced for patients with anatomically stenotic IJVs [2]. Stenoses of the IJVs usually occur<br />

at either upper neck level (around C2) or lower neck level (around C6). Here we further investigate the extracranial venous flow characteristics by studying the differences<br />

between the MS populations with stenotic IJVs at C2 and C6 levels.<br />

METHODS<br />

The study was approved by local institutional review board. Two hundred and seventeen (217) clinically definite MS patients and 15 normals signed informed consent forms<br />

and participated in the study. Three-dimensional CE-MRA data were collected to locate IJV stenoses by examination of the vasculature and multiple 2D TOF-MRV data with<br />

high in-plane resolution was used to measure vessel cross-sectional area (CSA) to determine stenoses. Thresholds of 25mm 2 around the cervical 6 (C6) level and 12.5mm 2<br />

around the C2 level were used to determine IJV stenosis. Based on this stenosis assessment, all subjects were divided into 3 groups, non-stenotic (NST), C2 stenotic (C2ST)<br />

and C6 stenotic (C6ST). Subjects with both C2ST and C6ST were classified as C6ST. Blood flow was measured with 2D PC-MRI imaging around C6 level perpendicular to the<br />

IJVs on a 3T Siemens Magnetom Tim Trio with the following parameters: TR = 14.4ms, TE = 4.41ms, flip angle = 25 o , FOV = 256mm×256mm, in-plane resolution =<br />

0.57mm×0.57mm, slice thickness = 4mm and maximum encoding velocity (VENC) = 50cm/sec. Retrospective pulse gating was used and a total of 25 images were<br />

reconstructed during one cardiac cycle. Vessel segmentation was achieved manually using our in-house MATLAB software. Occasional aliasing in major vessels was mostly<br />

corrected by a simple phase unwrapping algorithm [2]. Statistical analysis was performed to compare the quantitative findings among the groups. Paired and unpaired t-tests<br />

were performed as appropriate to evaluate the statistical significance of the differences.<br />

RESULTS<br />

Of the 217 subjects, 99 (45.6%) were determined to be in the NST<br />

group, 54 (24.9%) in the C2ST group and the remaining 64 (29.5%) in<br />

the C6ST group. Table 1 shows the quantitative flow measurements.<br />

There was no significant difference among the total arterial flow rates<br />

for the NST, C2ST and C6ST groups (16.16±2.73, 16.80±2.96 and<br />

16.26±2.56 mL/sec, respectively; p=0.18 between NST and C2ST,<br />

p=0.29 between C2ST and C6ST). For the whole population, the flow<br />

difference through the left and right common carotid arteries were not<br />

significant (6.51±1.31 vs. 6.57±1.34 mL/sec, respectively; p = 0.37).<br />

These findings, while not directly on the venous system, indicate that<br />

the method was not biased toward any group. On the venous side, the<br />

blood flow through the LIJV was found to be significantly less than that<br />

of the RIJV (4.31 ± 2.66 vs. 6.36 ± 3.06mL/sec, respectively; p2/3), (28.7, 54.0, 47.6, 33.3) % were type II (1/3 1/3; type<br />

III: FIJV/Fta

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!