ISNVD Abstract Book
ISNVD Abstract Book
ISNVD Abstract Book
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
FLOW THROUGH THE INTERNAL JUGULAR VEIN IS REDUCED<br />
FOR MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS PATIENTS WITH STENOSES<br />
COMPARED TO THOSE WITHOUT OBSERVED BY MRI<br />
W. Feng 1 , D. Utriainen 2 , Z. Wu 3 , D. Hubbard 4 , E. M. Haacke 1,2<br />
1<br />
Department of Radiology, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan 48201; 2 Magnetic Resonance Innovations, Inc., Detroit, MI 48202;<br />
3<br />
Department of Surgery, Morehouse School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, 30310; 4 Applied fMRI Institute, San Diego, CA 92131<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
Chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency (CCSVI) has been suggested to play an important role in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients [1]. Studies of venous flow of MS patients<br />
were mostly performed with ultrasound imaging. Our recent work using contrast enhanced MRA (CE-MRA), 2D time-of-flight MRV (TOF-MRV) and phase contrast MRI (PC-<br />
MRI) has shown that the internal jugular vein (IJV) flow at the cervical 6 (C6) level is reduced for patients with anatomically stenotic IJVs [2]. Stenoses of the IJVs usually occur<br />
at either upper neck level (around C2) or lower neck level (around C6). Here we further investigate the extracranial venous flow characteristics by studying the differences<br />
between the MS populations with stenotic IJVs at C2 and C6 levels.<br />
METHODS<br />
The study was approved by local institutional review board. Two hundred and seventeen (217) clinically definite MS patients and 15 normals signed informed consent forms<br />
and participated in the study. Three-dimensional CE-MRA data were collected to locate IJV stenoses by examination of the vasculature and multiple 2D TOF-MRV data with<br />
high in-plane resolution was used to measure vessel cross-sectional area (CSA) to determine stenoses. Thresholds of 25mm 2 around the cervical 6 (C6) level and 12.5mm 2<br />
around the C2 level were used to determine IJV stenosis. Based on this stenosis assessment, all subjects were divided into 3 groups, non-stenotic (NST), C2 stenotic (C2ST)<br />
and C6 stenotic (C6ST). Subjects with both C2ST and C6ST were classified as C6ST. Blood flow was measured with 2D PC-MRI imaging around C6 level perpendicular to the<br />
IJVs on a 3T Siemens Magnetom Tim Trio with the following parameters: TR = 14.4ms, TE = 4.41ms, flip angle = 25 o , FOV = 256mm×256mm, in-plane resolution =<br />
0.57mm×0.57mm, slice thickness = 4mm and maximum encoding velocity (VENC) = 50cm/sec. Retrospective pulse gating was used and a total of 25 images were<br />
reconstructed during one cardiac cycle. Vessel segmentation was achieved manually using our in-house MATLAB software. Occasional aliasing in major vessels was mostly<br />
corrected by a simple phase unwrapping algorithm [2]. Statistical analysis was performed to compare the quantitative findings among the groups. Paired and unpaired t-tests<br />
were performed as appropriate to evaluate the statistical significance of the differences.<br />
RESULTS<br />
Of the 217 subjects, 99 (45.6%) were determined to be in the NST<br />
group, 54 (24.9%) in the C2ST group and the remaining 64 (29.5%) in<br />
the C6ST group. Table 1 shows the quantitative flow measurements.<br />
There was no significant difference among the total arterial flow rates<br />
for the NST, C2ST and C6ST groups (16.16±2.73, 16.80±2.96 and<br />
16.26±2.56 mL/sec, respectively; p=0.18 between NST and C2ST,<br />
p=0.29 between C2ST and C6ST). For the whole population, the flow<br />
difference through the left and right common carotid arteries were not<br />
significant (6.51±1.31 vs. 6.57±1.34 mL/sec, respectively; p = 0.37).<br />
These findings, while not directly on the venous system, indicate that<br />
the method was not biased toward any group. On the venous side, the<br />
blood flow through the LIJV was found to be significantly less than that<br />
of the RIJV (4.31 ± 2.66 vs. 6.36 ± 3.06mL/sec, respectively; p2/3), (28.7, 54.0, 47.6, 33.3) % were type II (1/3 1/3; type<br />
III: FIJV/Fta