ISNVD Abstract Book
ISNVD Abstract Book
ISNVD Abstract Book
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
volume and higher pressure. There are proponents for both approaches. While hand injection mimics<br />
physiological venous flow, pressure injectors are more accurate, reproducible, make some flow related<br />
analyses quantifiable. Either or both approaches may be utilized in any case depending on the<br />
objectives desired. There are some modern injectors that allow low-pressure administration of contrast<br />
and perhaps such an equipment should be preferentially used.<br />
3. Interpretation of venographic pictures. Left versus right IJV<br />
It may seem obvious that venography of both internal jugular veins should be interpreted in the same<br />
way. But there are some arguments favoring a different approach to the right vs. left (or: dominant vs.<br />
non-dominant) jugular vein. Right internal jugular vein is usually bigger, its valve has longer leaflets;<br />
left internal jugular vein is smaller and has more transversally oriented valve leaflets. Perhaps these<br />
parameters should be taken into account while deciding if the vein assessed should be interpreted as<br />
normal, or pathological and requiring endovascular treatment. These dilemmas will be of special<br />
importance if the definition of pathology were based on quantitative assessment of the flow (which in<br />
most normal individuals is asymmetric). It is important to emphasize that asymmetry between the<br />
jugular veins itself is not pathological, however other attributes such as stenoses, need to be<br />
considered in the context of each individual jugular vein. In terms of what is a stenosis, there is little<br />
consensus, the authors of already published research have utilized an arbitrary definition of 50%<br />
luminal restriction when compared to nominal diameter of the proximal vein. However, the jugular<br />
vein stenosis in particular is more difficult to assess because of the routine dilatation of the vein<br />
cranially to the valve. Therefore, perhaps a nominal diameter of the vein proximal to the bulb or most<br />
dilated part of the distal jugular should be utilized.<br />
A few other considerations that are relevant in regards the jugular veins are, that unless the<br />
diagnostic catheter is placed at the level of the skull base/jugular foramen, one is likely to miss a<br />
multitude of anatomical and flow related anomalies in the upper jugular vein. Additionally, if an<br />
angled catheter is used and it is pointed medially, the injected contrast will specifically opacify<br />
through the mastoid and condylar emissary veins the vertebral and cervical epidural plexuses<br />
suggesting an underlying hemodynamic anomaly when none exists. Therefore, it is important that the<br />
angled catheters are directly laterally at the level of the jugular foramen. Frequently, the transverse<br />
process of the C1 vertebra will visibly indent the jugular vein (since the vein lies on this bony<br />
structure) however, a balloon will inflate under minimal pressure and Valsalva maneuver will enlarge<br />
the compressed vein during angiography or IVUS confirming this normal relationship.<br />
4. Interpretation of venographic pictures. Jugular valve.<br />
What should be regarded as a pathologic valve? Currently there are two ways of thinking. Firstly,<br />
some interpret jugular valve as abnormal if a narrowing at its level is detected: using venography,<br />
through inflating a compliant angioplastic balloon, or through intravascular ultrasound (IVUS).<br />
Secondly, some suggest that the valve should be interpreted as abnormal only if flow disturbances are<br />
found (no outflow through the vein, venous outflow slowed down, reversed flow direction, outflow<br />
through collaterals, etc). Probably more research in healthy individuals is needed to solve this<br />
problem. Such a research, however, will not be easy to perform taking into account an invasive nature<br />
of venography.<br />
5. Interpretation of venographic pictures. Azygous vein<br />
There is widespread discrepancy between performance and interpretation of azygous venograms.<br />
Firstly, there are no standards as to where exactly along the course of the azygous vein should a<br />
contrast injection be made, any injection made in the arch is likely to miss pathology in more proximal<br />
portions, while abdominal injections in a much smaller caliber vessel may artificially induce reverse