Learning in Affectively Intense Virtual Environments - LITE

Recommendations

Info

vii 3.2. QUALITATIVE RESULTS ............................................................................. 28 3.2.1. User Performance ................................................................................... 29 3.2.2. Measurement Tools ................................................................................ 31 3.2.3. Methodology .......................................................................................... 32 4. DISCUSSION .......................................................................................................... 34 4.1. LEARNING OUTCOMES AS A FUNCTION OF EXPERIMENTAL CONDITION.................................................................................................... 34 4.1. VR EXPERIENCE AS A FUNCTION OF EXPERIMENTAL CONDITION.................................................................................................... 34 4.3. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES AND VR EXPERIENCE.................................................................................................. 35 4.3.1. Affective Intensity (ID) .......................................................................... 35 4.3.2. Immersive Tendency .............................................................................. 35 4.3.3. Gender .................................................................................................... 36 4.4. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES AND LEARNING OUTCOMES............................................................................... 36 4.4.1. Immersive Tendency .............................................................................. 36 4.4.2. Affect Intensity (ID).............................................................................. 37 4.4.3. Gender .................................................................................................... 37 4.5. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN VR EXPERIENCE AND LEARNING OUTCOMES.................................................................................................... 37 4.5.1. Presence.................................................................................................. 37 4.5.2. GSR ....................................................................................................... 38 4.6. ADDITIONAL INSIGHTS .............................................................................. 38 5. CONCLUSION ........................................................................................................ 40 APPENDICES A. INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCE MEASURE: AFFECT INTENSITY ITEMS ... 43 B. INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCE MEASURE: IMMERSIVE TENDENCY ITEMS.............................................................................................................. 45 C. HOW TO USE CONTROLS AND NAVIGATION IN THE ACCLIMATION VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENT .......................................................................... 48 D. PRESENCE QUESTIONNAIRE ....................................................................... 50 E. SCENAIRO......................................................................................................... 52
viii BIBLIOGRAPHY............................................................................................................. 55 VITA................................................................................................................................. 58
Page 2 and 3: LEARNING IN AFFECTIVELY INTENSE VIR
Page 4 and 5: iii ABSTRACT The main purpose of th
Page 6 and 7: v TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ABSTRACT .
Page 10 and 11: ix LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS Figure Pag
Page 12 and 13: xi NOMENCLATURE Symbol Description
Page 14 and 15: 2 1.2. VIRTUAL REALITY IN EDUCATION
Page 16 and 17: 4 Chalmers conducted experiments us
Page 18 and 19: 6 Another example of using virtual
Page 20 and 21: 8 that will be needed to build "hum
Page 22 and 23: 10 1.6. VIRTUAL REALITY AND PRESENC
Page 24 and 25: 12 responder scenario for training
Page 26 and 27: 14 1.7.3. Pilot Research Method. Fi
Page 28 and 29: 16 1.8.2.2 VR Experience as a Funct
Page 30 and 31: 18 Measure as developed by Larsen &
Page 32 and 33: 20 Figure 2.0. LITE Usability Lab S
Page 34 and 35: 22 On successful completion of the
Page 36 and 37: 24 3. RESULTS 3.1. QUANTITATIVE RES
Page 38 and 39: 26 Table 3.2. Pearson Correlations
Page 40 and 41: 28 ANOVA was statistically signific
Page 42 and 43: 30 reaching the objectives save one
Page 44 and 45: 32 GSR readings peaked in response
Page 46 and 47: 34 4. DISCUSSION 4.1. LEARNING OUTC
Page 48 and 49: 36 based on these findings, whether
Page 50 and 51: 38 to which the participants were c
Page 52 and 53: 40 5. CONCLUSION There is evidence
Page 54 and 55: 42 The individual difference, affec
Page 56 and 57: 44 1. When I feel happy, it is a st
Page 58 and 59:
46 1. Do you ever get extremely inv
Page 60 and 61:
48 APPENDIX C. HOW TO USE CONTROLS
Page 62 and 63:
50 APPENDIX D. PRESENCE QUESTIONNAI
Page 64 and 65:
52 APPENDIX E. SCENARIO
Page 66 and 67:
54 c. put out the fire. 4. At the e
Page 68 and 69:
56 Hays, R. T., & Vincenzi, D. A. (
Page 70:
58 VITA Lawrence M. Wilfred Date of
show all

Learning in Affectively Intense Virtual Environments - LITE

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?