On the Sensitivity of Numerical Wind Field Modeling - WindSim

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Hundhammerfjellet – climatology transfer AEP/AEP ref : -10.72 Errors in the order of 5% due to discrete representation of the climatologies. (5% + 5% = 10% when moving back and forth) AEP/AEP ref : -0.67 AEP ref : 6.332 (GWh/y) AEP/AEP ref : -11.52 AEP/AEP ref : -4.08 Use the time histories instead of the frequency distribution when postprocessing the wind field simulations.
Weighting of climatology data Summary: The representation of climatology data by a frequency distribution introduces significant interpolation errors. Finer resolution, more sectors and bins would reduce the errors, the best would be to use time series. Next: Power curve correction
Page 1 and 2: On the Sensitivity of Numerical Win
Page 3 and 4: WindSim AS 1993 VECTOR AS; CFD cons
Page 5 and 6: AEP variation within a wind farm Si
Page 7 and 8: Simple terrain - Resources Wind res
Page 9 and 10: Simple terrain - Optimization Alter
Page 11 and 12: AEP variation within a wind farm Su
Page 13 and 14: Terrain conversion Conversion from
Page 15 and 16: Linear versus non-linear methods St
Page 17 and 18: Cosine hill - climatology Sector 1
Page 19 and 20: Cosine hill - reference case Terrai
Page 21 and 22: Cosine hill - ID 2000 WECS_40 WECS_
Page 23 and 24: Cosine hill Dowmstream climatology
Page 25 and 26: AEP parameter sensitivities - proce
Page 27 and 28: Hundhammerfjellet - 2D ridge Locati
Page 29 and 30: Climatology transfer The discrete r
Page 31: Hundhammerfjellet - climatology tra
Page 35 and 36: Energy content - wind profiles Ener
Page 37 and 38: Power curve correction procedure P
Page 39 and 40: Conclusion Calculation of the AEP i

On the Sensitivity of Numerical Wind Field Modeling - WindSim

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?