Test of WindSim for the Wind Flow with Recirculation
Test of WindSim for the Wind Flow with Recirculation
Test of WindSim for the Wind Flow with Recirculation
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Sirhowy Valley Experiment• Located at South Wales, UK– Length 1.8km, Depth 200m• Periodic Valley Terrain– Periodic boundary conditions were applied• For Westerly(270 o ) and Easterly(90 o ) <strong>Wind</strong>s• Mason & King (1984), Mason (1987)Korea Institute <strong>of</strong> Energy Research
Separation and Reattachment PointsKorea Institute <strong>of</strong> Energy Research
Korea Institute <strong>of</strong> Energy ResearchSeparation and Reattachment PointsRNG k-e Modified , k-w k-eConstant
Benchmark S<strong>of</strong>twareS<strong>of</strong>twareTheoryTurbulenceModelWAsP Linear -<strong><strong>Wind</strong>Sim</strong>CFDk-eModified k-eMeteodyn CFD One-equationCommentsEasy & FastWell known to WE industryAdequate <strong>for</strong> complex terrainBased on Phoenics, CHAMAdaptive grid generationStability considerationH.G.Kim*CFDk-e, k-w,RNG k-eIn-house code <strong>for</strong> R&D* H.G. Kim and V.C. Patel (2000) <strong>Test</strong> <strong>of</strong> Turbulence Models <strong>for</strong> <strong>Wind</strong> <strong>Flow</strong> over Terrains<strong>with</strong> Separation and <strong>Recirculation</strong>, Boundary-Layer MeteorologyKorea Institute <strong>of</strong> Energy Research
Terrain Slope (deg)U/Us @ 8m a.g.l.Elevation (m)Elevation (m)Easterly <strong>Wind</strong> Case1.51.2510.750.50.257006005004003000-0.25-0.5-500 0 500 1000 1500 20002001000Horizontal Distance (m)WAsP Meteodyn Field Data HGKim <strong><strong>Wind</strong>Sim</strong> Elevation403020100-500 0 500 1000 1500 20005004003002001000Terrain SlopeElevationKorea Institute <strong>of</strong> Energy Research
U/Us @ 8m a.g.l.Elevation (m)Westerly <strong>Wind</strong> Case1.51.2510.750.50.257006005004003000-0.25-0.5-500 0 500 1000 1500 20002001000Horizontal Distance (m)WAsP Meteodyn <strong><strong>Wind</strong>Sim</strong> Elevation• Separation is expected over terrain slope 15 deg. (Wood, 1995)• What else can we consider?Transient <strong>Flow</strong>, Three-dimensional effect, Periodic boundary conditions, etc.Korea Institute <strong>of</strong> Energy Research
Conclusions• WAsP does not predict recirculationWAsP is really a linear model (W = E)• Meteodyn nei<strong>the</strong>r predict recirculationquite similar to WAsP prediction• <strong><strong>Wind</strong>Sim</strong> seems to be more improvedRNG k-epsilon model is recommendedTransient simulation may be necessaryKorea Institute <strong>of</strong> Energy Research
Auto-Validation <strong>of</strong> Micrositing at <strong>the</strong>Antarctic King Sejong Station<strong><strong>Wind</strong>Sim</strong> User Meeting 2007June 21-22, Tonsberg, NorwayKorea Institute <strong>of</strong> Energy ResearchDr. Hyun-Goo Kim
Korea Institute <strong>of</strong> Energy ResearchKing George Island
Korea Institute <strong>of</strong> Energy ResearchKing Sejong StationSensorsW=15mL=35mD=50mH=5ms=7md=20mh=15m
Building Effects• CFD experiment to figure out building effectsTwo prevailing wind directions are considered (N, E)• <strong>Wind</strong> speed change due to domes is negligibleKIER10987654321010987654321010987654321015m a.g.l. (Hub height)7m a.g.l. (Sensor height) 2m a.g.l. (Ground level)Korea Institute <strong>of</strong> Energy Research
Korea Institute <strong>of</strong> Energy ResearchAuto-Validation1514500040003000KIERKMA200010002000 3000 4000 5000 600050005000400040003000300020002000100010002000 3000 4000 5000 60002000 3000 4000 5000 6000WAsP (KMA) Meteodyn (KMA) <strong><strong>Wind</strong>Sim</strong> (KMA)131211109876543210500050005000400040004000KIER1.42KIER1.45KMAKMA3000300030001.012000200020001000100010002000 3000 4000 5000 60002000 3000 4000 5000 60002000 3000 4000 5000 6000WAsP (KMA-KIER) Meteodyn (KIER-KMA) <strong><strong>Wind</strong>Sim</strong> (KMA-KIER)1.51.41.31.21.110.90.80.70.60.50.40.30.20.10
TMY (m)TMY (m)Korea Institute <strong>of</strong> Energy ResearchEffect <strong>of</strong> Complex TerrainKMA5500KIER500045004000350030002500200015001000MASTKIERSlope > 15 oMarian Cove2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 5500 6000 6500TMX (m)King George IslandMean<strong>Wind</strong>Speed(m/s)Acceleration and direction change / Retardation due to steep hill at <strong>the</strong> back20191817161514131211109876543210
Conclusions• Auto-validation <strong>of</strong> wind mappingKMA prediction vs. KIER predictionIdeally, two predictions are supposed to be identical• RMSE errors <strong>of</strong> wind speed predictionWAsP 0.64 m/s (21% larger than <strong><strong>Wind</strong>Sim</strong>)Meteodyn 0.89 m/s (68% larger than <strong><strong>Wind</strong>Sim</strong>)<strong><strong>Wind</strong>Sim</strong> 0.53 m/s• <strong><strong>Wind</strong>Sim</strong> won <strong>the</strong> minimal error prize!Korea Institute <strong>of</strong> Energy Research
For Tecplot Users• Data conversion program <strong>for</strong> Tecplot, phi2tec.fD:\<strong><strong>Wind</strong>Sim</strong>\Project\windfield\unzip 090.phi.Z and 090.xyz.Zconvert Pheonics <strong>for</strong>mat → Tecplot <strong>for</strong>matEmail me if you need, hyungoo@kier.re.krKorea Institute <strong>of</strong> Energy Research
Korea Institute <strong>of</strong> Energy ResearchThank youhyungoo@kier.re.krhttp://windenergy.kier.re.kr/hyungoo