13.07.2015 Views

Test of WindSim for the Wind Flow with Recirculation

Test of WindSim for the Wind Flow with Recirculation

Test of WindSim for the Wind Flow with Recirculation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Sirhowy Valley Experiment• Located at South Wales, UK– Length 1.8km, Depth 200m• Periodic Valley Terrain– Periodic boundary conditions were applied• For Westerly(270 o ) and Easterly(90 o ) <strong>Wind</strong>s• Mason & King (1984), Mason (1987)Korea Institute <strong>of</strong> Energy Research


Separation and Reattachment PointsKorea Institute <strong>of</strong> Energy Research


Korea Institute <strong>of</strong> Energy ResearchSeparation and Reattachment PointsRNG k-e Modified , k-w k-eConstant


Benchmark S<strong>of</strong>twareS<strong>of</strong>twareTheoryTurbulenceModelWAsP Linear -<strong><strong>Wind</strong>Sim</strong>CFDk-eModified k-eMeteodyn CFD One-equationCommentsEasy & FastWell known to WE industryAdequate <strong>for</strong> complex terrainBased on Phoenics, CHAMAdaptive grid generationStability considerationH.G.Kim*CFDk-e, k-w,RNG k-eIn-house code <strong>for</strong> R&D* H.G. Kim and V.C. Patel (2000) <strong>Test</strong> <strong>of</strong> Turbulence Models <strong>for</strong> <strong>Wind</strong> <strong>Flow</strong> over Terrains<strong>with</strong> Separation and <strong>Recirculation</strong>, Boundary-Layer MeteorologyKorea Institute <strong>of</strong> Energy Research


Terrain Slope (deg)U/Us @ 8m a.g.l.Elevation (m)Elevation (m)Easterly <strong>Wind</strong> Case1.51.2510.750.50.257006005004003000-0.25-0.5-500 0 500 1000 1500 20002001000Horizontal Distance (m)WAsP Meteodyn Field Data HGKim <strong><strong>Wind</strong>Sim</strong> Elevation403020100-500 0 500 1000 1500 20005004003002001000Terrain SlopeElevationKorea Institute <strong>of</strong> Energy Research


U/Us @ 8m a.g.l.Elevation (m)Westerly <strong>Wind</strong> Case1.51.2510.750.50.257006005004003000-0.25-0.5-500 0 500 1000 1500 20002001000Horizontal Distance (m)WAsP Meteodyn <strong><strong>Wind</strong>Sim</strong> Elevation• Separation is expected over terrain slope 15 deg. (Wood, 1995)• What else can we consider?Transient <strong>Flow</strong>, Three-dimensional effect, Periodic boundary conditions, etc.Korea Institute <strong>of</strong> Energy Research


Conclusions• WAsP does not predict recirculationWAsP is really a linear model (W = E)• Meteodyn nei<strong>the</strong>r predict recirculationquite similar to WAsP prediction• <strong><strong>Wind</strong>Sim</strong> seems to be more improvedRNG k-epsilon model is recommendedTransient simulation may be necessaryKorea Institute <strong>of</strong> Energy Research


Auto-Validation <strong>of</strong> Micrositing at <strong>the</strong>Antarctic King Sejong Station<strong><strong>Wind</strong>Sim</strong> User Meeting 2007June 21-22, Tonsberg, NorwayKorea Institute <strong>of</strong> Energy ResearchDr. Hyun-Goo Kim


Korea Institute <strong>of</strong> Energy ResearchKing George Island


Korea Institute <strong>of</strong> Energy ResearchKing Sejong StationSensorsW=15mL=35mD=50mH=5ms=7md=20mh=15m


Building Effects• CFD experiment to figure out building effectsTwo prevailing wind directions are considered (N, E)• <strong>Wind</strong> speed change due to domes is negligibleKIER10987654321010987654321010987654321015m a.g.l. (Hub height)7m a.g.l. (Sensor height) 2m a.g.l. (Ground level)Korea Institute <strong>of</strong> Energy Research


Korea Institute <strong>of</strong> Energy ResearchAuto-Validation1514500040003000KIERKMA200010002000 3000 4000 5000 600050005000400040003000300020002000100010002000 3000 4000 5000 60002000 3000 4000 5000 6000WAsP (KMA) Meteodyn (KMA) <strong><strong>Wind</strong>Sim</strong> (KMA)131211109876543210500050005000400040004000KIER1.42KIER1.45KMAKMA3000300030001.012000200020001000100010002000 3000 4000 5000 60002000 3000 4000 5000 60002000 3000 4000 5000 6000WAsP (KMA-KIER) Meteodyn (KIER-KMA) <strong><strong>Wind</strong>Sim</strong> (KMA-KIER)1.51.41.31.21.110.90.80.70.60.50.40.30.20.10


TMY (m)TMY (m)Korea Institute <strong>of</strong> Energy ResearchEffect <strong>of</strong> Complex TerrainKMA5500KIER500045004000350030002500200015001000MASTKIERSlope > 15 oMarian Cove2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 5500 6000 6500TMX (m)King George IslandMean<strong>Wind</strong>Speed(m/s)Acceleration and direction change / Retardation due to steep hill at <strong>the</strong> back20191817161514131211109876543210


Conclusions• Auto-validation <strong>of</strong> wind mappingKMA prediction vs. KIER predictionIdeally, two predictions are supposed to be identical• RMSE errors <strong>of</strong> wind speed predictionWAsP 0.64 m/s (21% larger than <strong><strong>Wind</strong>Sim</strong>)Meteodyn 0.89 m/s (68% larger than <strong><strong>Wind</strong>Sim</strong>)<strong><strong>Wind</strong>Sim</strong> 0.53 m/s• <strong><strong>Wind</strong>Sim</strong> won <strong>the</strong> minimal error prize!Korea Institute <strong>of</strong> Energy Research


For Tecplot Users• Data conversion program <strong>for</strong> Tecplot, phi2tec.fD:\<strong><strong>Wind</strong>Sim</strong>\Project\windfield\unzip 090.phi.Z and 090.xyz.Zconvert Pheonics <strong>for</strong>mat → Tecplot <strong>for</strong>matEmail me if you need, hyungoo@kier.re.krKorea Institute <strong>of</strong> Energy Research


Korea Institute <strong>of</strong> Energy ResearchThank youhyungoo@kier.re.krhttp://windenergy.kier.re.kr/hyungoo

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!