02.07.2015 Views

long-term care use and supply in europe: projections for germany ...

long-term care use and supply in europe: projections for germany ...

long-term care use and supply in europe: projections for germany ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

LONG-TERM CARE USE AND SUPPLY IN EUROPE | 9<br />

receive benefits. The number of people <strong>in</strong> need of <strong>care</strong> that were deemed <strong>in</strong>eligible to receive LTCI<br />

funds <strong>in</strong>cluded 3 million <strong>in</strong> private ho<strong>use</strong>holds <strong>in</strong> 2002 <strong>and</strong> 45,000 people <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>stitutions <strong>in</strong> 2005<br />

(Schulz, 2011). The prevalence of <strong>in</strong>stitutionalisation is thus likely understated.<br />

Benefits are made available to all <strong>in</strong>sured persons irrespective of age, <strong>in</strong>come or wealth. Benefit levels<br />

are based on need, where the “need of <strong>long</strong>-<strong>term</strong> <strong>care</strong>” legally refers to those who, ow<strong>in</strong>g to a physical,<br />

psychological or mental disease or h<strong>and</strong>icap, require significant help to carry out the daily <strong>and</strong> recurr<strong>in</strong>g<br />

activities of everyday liv<strong>in</strong>g over a pro<strong>long</strong>ed period of time (<strong>for</strong> at least six months). Eligibility is based<br />

on whether <strong>in</strong>dividuals need help carry<strong>in</strong>g out at least two basic activities of daily liv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> one<br />

additional <strong>in</strong>strumental activity of daily liv<strong>in</strong>g (IADL). Dependency levels are based on how often<br />

assistance is needed <strong>and</strong> how <strong>long</strong> it takes a non-professional <strong>care</strong>giver to help the dependent person 4 ,<br />

as follows:<br />

• Care level I: People who need assistance with personal hygiene, feed<strong>in</strong>g or mobility <strong>for</strong> at least<br />

two activities at least once per day <strong>and</strong> who additionally need ho<strong>use</strong>hold help <strong>for</strong> at least 90<br />

m<strong>in</strong>utes per day (45 m<strong>in</strong>utes of which is accounted <strong>for</strong> by basic <strong>care</strong>) several times per week.<br />

• Care level II: People who need assistance with at least two basic ADL at least three times per day<br />

at various times of the day <strong>and</strong> who additionally need help <strong>in</strong> IADL (two hours of which is<br />

accounted <strong>for</strong> by basic <strong>care</strong>) several times per week.<br />

• Care level III: People who need assistance with at least two ADL around the clock <strong>and</strong> who<br />

additionally need help <strong>in</strong> IADL <strong>for</strong> at least five hours per day (four hours of which is accounted<br />

<strong>for</strong> by basic <strong>care</strong>) several times per week.<br />

• Hardship cases: People who exceed the requirements of <strong>care</strong> level III by need<strong>in</strong>g assistance with<br />

ADL <strong>for</strong> at least seven hours a day, at least two of which are dur<strong>in</strong>g the night or whose basic <strong>care</strong><br />

may only be met by several people work<strong>in</strong>g at the same time 5 .<br />

Thus, we much keep <strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong> the follow<strong>in</strong>g section that functional impairment is def<strong>in</strong>ed differently<br />

<strong>for</strong> the German, Dutch <strong>and</strong> Spanish cases. Nonetheless, Table 2.3 demonstrates that the prevalence of<br />

<strong>in</strong>stitutionalisation among persons receiv<strong>in</strong>g LTCI benefits <strong>in</strong>creases with the severity of disability <strong>and</strong><br />

age (age be<strong>in</strong>g correlated with both health status <strong>and</strong> marital status). More <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>gly, prevalence rates<br />

are higher <strong>for</strong> women except <strong>for</strong> <strong>care</strong> level I be<strong>for</strong>e age 75 <strong>and</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>care</strong> level II be<strong>for</strong>e age 70. In other<br />

words, prevalence rates <strong>in</strong>crease more quickly with age <strong>for</strong> women than <strong>for</strong> men. This result can be<br />

partly expla<strong>in</strong>ed by differences <strong>in</strong> marital status between men <strong>and</strong> women at old ages, with women be<strong>in</strong>g<br />

more likely to live alone.<br />

4 The Medical Review Boards of the Statutory Health Insurance Funds per<strong>for</strong>m the assessment to de<strong>term</strong><strong>in</strong>e<br />

whether an <strong>in</strong>dividual is entitled to benefits. Individuals are assessed <strong>for</strong> limitations <strong>in</strong> activities of daily liv<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

such as bath<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> dress<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>strumental activities of daily liv<strong>in</strong>g, such as shopp<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> cook<strong>in</strong>g, as well as<br />

hours of <strong>care</strong> needed per day. These assessments have foc<strong>use</strong>d largely on physical needs <strong>for</strong> personal <strong>care</strong>,<br />

nutrition <strong>and</strong> mobility rather than on needs <strong>for</strong> supervision or cue<strong>in</strong>g, which persons with dementia or learn<strong>in</strong>g<br />

disabilities often need. The new LTCI re<strong>for</strong>m changed this situation <strong>in</strong> 2008. People whose competence <strong>in</strong> cop<strong>in</strong>g<br />

with everyday life is considerably impaired are now assessed on the basis of a special criteria catalogue. If<br />

applicants fulfil the criteria, they are eligible to receive additional benefits. Also, people who do not fulfil the<br />

criteria <strong>for</strong> <strong>care</strong> level I are now entitled to receive benefits (MDS, 2008).<br />

5 Beca<strong>use</strong> few <strong>in</strong>dividuals <strong>in</strong> our data were categorized as be<strong>in</strong>g hardship cases, we have not reported prevalence<br />

rates of <strong>in</strong>stitutionalization <strong>for</strong> this category of <strong>care</strong> level <strong>in</strong> Table 2.3.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!