02.07.2015 Views

long-term care use and supply in europe: projections for germany ...

long-term care use and supply in europe: projections for germany ...

long-term care use and supply in europe: projections for germany ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

LONG-TERM CARE USE AND SUPPLY IN EUROPE | 17<br />

3.2 Study design<br />

3.2.1 Aim<br />

The purpose of the present analysis is to identify the ma<strong>in</strong> de<strong>term</strong><strong>in</strong>ants of <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mal <strong>and</strong> <strong>for</strong>mal <strong>care</strong> <strong>use</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong> different LTC systems <strong>and</strong> to <strong>use</strong> this <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mation to produce estimated probabilities of <strong>care</strong> <strong>use</strong> by<br />

relevant characteristics of older persons. These estimates will be comb<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> Chapter 4 with projected<br />

numbers of older persons by the same characteristics <strong>in</strong> order to project future numbers of LTC <strong>use</strong>rs.<br />

The analysis <strong>in</strong>cludes three countries – Germany, the Netherl<strong>and</strong>s <strong>and</strong> Spa<strong>in</strong> – each representative of a<br />

cluster of countries with a different type of LTC system, as identified <strong>in</strong> WP 1 of the ANCIEN project<br />

(Kraus et al., 2010). Cluster 1, to which Germany be<strong>long</strong>s, consists of countries where a low level of<br />

public spend<strong>in</strong>g is comb<strong>in</strong>ed with a modest share of private spend<strong>in</strong>g, high <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mal <strong>care</strong> <strong>use</strong> <strong>and</strong> high<br />

<strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mal <strong>care</strong> support. The Netherl<strong>and</strong>s be<strong>long</strong>s to cluster 2, a cluster of Northern European countries<br />

characterized by high public LTC spend<strong>in</strong>g, low private spend<strong>in</strong>g, low <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mal <strong>care</strong> <strong>use</strong> <strong>and</strong> high<br />

<strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mal <strong>care</strong> support. Spa<strong>in</strong> <strong>and</strong> the other countries of cluster 3 share the profile of cluster 1 with regard<br />

to <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mal <strong>care</strong> <strong>use</strong> <strong>and</strong> support, but have a much higher level of private responsibility <strong>and</strong> a somewhat<br />

higher level of public spend<strong>in</strong>g. Pol<strong>and</strong> was selected as representative of a fourth cluster, characterized<br />

by a small public sector <strong>in</strong>volvement, more private spend<strong>in</strong>g, high <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mal <strong>care</strong> provision comb<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

with few supportive measures <strong>for</strong> <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mal <strong>care</strong>givers. However, due to the unavailability of <strong>care</strong> <strong>use</strong><br />

data, Pol<strong>and</strong> could not be <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> the present analysis 8 . Given the considerable differences between<br />

the clusters <strong>in</strong> the organisation <strong>and</strong> f<strong>in</strong>anc<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>long</strong>-<strong>term</strong>, one can reasonably expect that the effects of<br />

predictors of <strong>care</strong> <strong>use</strong> vary across the three countries.<br />

3.2.2 Data <strong>and</strong> methods<br />

This study <strong>use</strong>s pooled data from Wave 1 (2004 <strong>and</strong> 2005) <strong>and</strong> Wave 2 (2006 <strong>and</strong> 2007) of the Survey of<br />

Health, Age<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> Retirement <strong>in</strong> Europe, release 2.3.1. The analytical sample was restricted to<br />

respondents aged 65 <strong>and</strong> over, liv<strong>in</strong>g at home, <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>cludes 2,491 observations <strong>for</strong> Germany, 2,134<br />

observations <strong>for</strong> the Netherl<strong>and</strong>s <strong>and</strong> 2,265 observations <strong>for</strong> Spa<strong>in</strong>.<br />

a. Dependent variable<br />

The variable of <strong>in</strong>terest is the type of help older persons receive with personal <strong>care</strong> (activities of daily<br />

liv<strong>in</strong>g or ADLs) or with nurs<strong>in</strong>g <strong>care</strong>. The analysis does not <strong>in</strong>clude help with ho<strong>use</strong>hold tasks <strong>for</strong> the<br />

follow<strong>in</strong>g reasons:<br />

1. Results are <strong>use</strong>d to make <strong>projections</strong> of <strong>for</strong>mal <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mal <strong>care</strong> <strong>use</strong>, which start from<br />

<strong>projections</strong> of <strong>care</strong> needs def<strong>in</strong>ed as hav<strong>in</strong>g ADL limitations. In WP 2 of the ANCIEN project,<br />

<strong>projections</strong> of the number of older persons need<strong>in</strong>g LTC <strong>care</strong> have been developed. LTC need has<br />

been def<strong>in</strong>ed as hav<strong>in</strong>g ‘at least one limitation <strong>in</strong> basic activities of daily liv<strong>in</strong>g (ADL-disability),<br />

based on the Katz ADL disability scale’ <strong>and</strong> items <strong>in</strong>cluded are: bath<strong>in</strong>g, dress<strong>in</strong>g, eat<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>in</strong>door<br />

transferr<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> toilet<strong>in</strong>g/cont<strong>in</strong>ence (Bonneux, van der Gaag, & Bijwaard, 2011). Projections of<br />

the number of persons need<strong>in</strong>g help with ho<strong>use</strong>hold tasks have not been provided.<br />

2. In<strong>for</strong>mation <strong>in</strong> SHARE on <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mal help with ho<strong>use</strong>hold tasks is limited. One could argue that<br />

ADL disabled persons generally need help with ho<strong>use</strong>hold tasks or <strong>in</strong>strumental activities of daily<br />

liv<strong>in</strong>g (IADLs) also. There<strong>for</strong>e, it could be relevant to <strong>in</strong>clude ho<strong>use</strong>hold help, all the more so as<br />

studies have shown that <strong>use</strong> of <strong>for</strong>mal <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mal <strong>care</strong> differs <strong>for</strong> ho<strong>use</strong>hold help <strong>and</strong> personal<br />

<strong>care</strong>, but with a huge variation between countries (see <strong>for</strong> <strong>in</strong>stance Br<strong>and</strong>t et al., 2009). However,<br />

the SHARE data on help with IADL only <strong>in</strong>clude <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mation on help from outside the ho<strong>use</strong>hold,<br />

not on help provided by ho<strong>use</strong>hold members. This could raise comparability issues, as <strong>for</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>stance co-residence of older parents <strong>and</strong> their children differs considerably with<strong>in</strong> Europe. By<br />

8 Pol<strong>and</strong> participated <strong>in</strong> Wave 2 of SHARE, but due to a cod<strong>in</strong>g error which resulted <strong>in</strong> wrong rout<strong>in</strong>g the variables<br />

on home <strong>care</strong> are miss<strong>in</strong>g <strong>for</strong> all Polish cases.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!