02.07.2015 Views

long-term care use and supply in europe: projections for germany ...

long-term care use and supply in europe: projections for germany ...

long-term care use and supply in europe: projections for germany ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

LONG-TERM CARE USE AND SUPPLY IN EUROPE | 43<br />

Figure 4.2 Prevalence of residential <strong>care</strong> <strong>use</strong>, <strong>in</strong> Germany, the Netherl<strong>and</strong>s, Spa<strong>in</strong> <strong>and</strong> Pol<strong>and</strong>,<br />

2010-2060, DELAY scenario (% of total population aged 65 <strong>and</strong> over)<br />

10%<br />

9%<br />

8%<br />

7%<br />

6%<br />

5%<br />

4%<br />

3%<br />

2%<br />

1%<br />

0%<br />

2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050 2055 2060<br />

DE NL ES PL<br />

Source: see Table 4.2.<br />

As is shown <strong>in</strong> Figure 4.3 to Figure 4.6, the projected numbers of residential <strong>care</strong> <strong>use</strong>rs are quite<br />

sensitive to alternative bio-demographic scenarios. In the four countries, projected numbers of<br />

residential <strong>care</strong> <strong>use</strong>rs are lowest under the CONST scenario. This scenario assumes that mortality rates<br />

would not decrease <strong>in</strong> future years, result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> lower numbers of older persons <strong>and</strong>, hence, lower<br />

numbers of <strong>care</strong> <strong>use</strong>rs. Leav<strong>in</strong>g the 'optimistic' <strong>and</strong> not very realistic CONST scenario out of<br />

consideration, the projected numbers of residential <strong>care</strong> <strong>use</strong>rs still vary considerably <strong>in</strong> Germany. In the<br />

Netherl<strong>and</strong>s, Spa<strong>in</strong> <strong>and</strong> Pol<strong>and</strong>, <strong>projections</strong> are less sensitive to alternative assumptions about disability<br />

trends. This difference <strong>in</strong> sensibility to alternative disability <strong>projections</strong> is related to differences <strong>in</strong> the<br />

share of non-disabled residential <strong>care</strong> <strong>use</strong>rs <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> the age-gradient of residential <strong>care</strong> <strong>use</strong>. In the four<br />

countries, the projected <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> the number of residential <strong>care</strong> <strong>use</strong>rs between 2010 <strong>and</strong> 2060 is lowest<br />

under the BIOL scenario, DELAY comes next, followed by PREV <strong>and</strong> CHRON.<br />

For Germany, the projected <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> the number of residential <strong>care</strong> <strong>use</strong>rs between 2010 <strong>and</strong> 2060<br />

ranges from 74% under the BIOL scenario to 153% under the CHRON scenario. For the Netherl<strong>and</strong>s the<br />

<strong>in</strong>crease ranges from 188% to 231 %, <strong>for</strong> Spa<strong>in</strong> from 159% to 168% <strong>and</strong> <strong>for</strong> Pol<strong>and</strong> from 130% to 176%<br />

(see Table A4.6, Table A4.9, Table A4.12 <strong>and</strong> Table A4.15 <strong>in</strong> Appendix).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!