02.07.2015 Views

long-term care use and supply in europe: projections for germany ...

long-term care use and supply in europe: projections for germany ...

long-term care use and supply in europe: projections for germany ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3. De<strong>term</strong><strong>in</strong>ants of <strong>use</strong> of <strong>for</strong>mal <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mal personal <strong>care</strong> by older<br />

persons liv<strong>in</strong>g at home: Evidence from Germany, the Netherl<strong>and</strong>s<br />

<strong>and</strong> Spa<strong>in</strong><br />

Joanna Geerts, Federal Plann<strong>in</strong>g Bureau<br />

Introduction<br />

Population age<strong>in</strong>g is expected to substantially <strong>in</strong>crease the number of <strong>care</strong> dependent older persons <strong>and</strong>,<br />

consequently, the number of <strong>long</strong>-<strong>term</strong> <strong>care</strong> (LTC) <strong>use</strong>rs <strong>in</strong> future years. The impact of population<br />

age<strong>in</strong>g on <strong>for</strong>mal <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mal <strong>care</strong> <strong>use</strong> is, however, likely to differ considerably across European<br />

countries. Populations are, <strong>in</strong> fact, age<strong>in</strong>g to a different extent <strong>and</strong> at a different pace. Furthermore, LTC<br />

is currently be<strong>in</strong>g organised <strong>and</strong> f<strong>in</strong>anced <strong>in</strong> very different ways <strong>and</strong> the extent to which older persons<br />

rely on <strong>for</strong>mal or <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mal <strong>care</strong>rs varies widely between countries.<br />

In mak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>projections</strong> of future <strong>use</strong> of <strong>for</strong>mal <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mal <strong>care</strong> by older persons liv<strong>in</strong>g at home, it is<br />

important to discern the ma<strong>in</strong> factors affect<strong>in</strong>g <strong>care</strong> utilisation. Whether older persons are rely<strong>in</strong>g on<br />

<strong>for</strong>mal or <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mal <strong>care</strong>givers depends on <strong>in</strong>dividual level characteristics such as the level of <strong>care</strong><br />

dependency <strong>and</strong> the potential availability of <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mal <strong>care</strong>, but is also de<strong>term</strong><strong>in</strong>ed by societal <strong>and</strong> <strong>care</strong><br />

system level factors such as available <strong>supply</strong> <strong>and</strong> organisational characteristics of <strong>for</strong>mal <strong>care</strong> services.<br />

Given the huge variation across Europe <strong>in</strong> availability <strong>and</strong> allocation of <strong>care</strong> services, one can<br />

reasonably expect there to be differences between countries not only <strong>in</strong> levels of <strong>for</strong>mal <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mal<br />

<strong>care</strong> <strong>use</strong>, but also <strong>in</strong> how <strong>care</strong> <strong>use</strong> is related to older persons’ characteristics. For <strong>in</strong>stance, <strong>in</strong> countries<br />

with strong needs-based entitlements to LTC services one would expect <strong>use</strong> of <strong>for</strong>mal <strong>care</strong> not only to be<br />

higher, but also to be more strongly associated with disability <strong>and</strong> less related to potential availability of<br />

<strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mal <strong>care</strong> than <strong>in</strong> countries where access is means-tested <strong>and</strong> services are targeted at persons without<br />

<strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mal support.<br />

This chapter analyses similarities <strong>and</strong> differences <strong>in</strong> de<strong>term</strong><strong>in</strong>ants of <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mal <strong>and</strong> <strong>for</strong>mal personal <strong>care</strong><br />

<strong>use</strong> <strong>in</strong> Germany, the Netherl<strong>and</strong>s <strong>and</strong> Spa<strong>in</strong>, each representative of a cluster of countries with a different<br />

LTC system, as identified by Kraus et al. (2010) <strong>in</strong> work package (WP) 1 of the ANCIEN project. 7 The<br />

ma<strong>in</strong> purpose of this study is to estimate probabilities of <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mal <strong>and</strong> <strong>for</strong>mal <strong>care</strong> <strong>use</strong> by relevant<br />

characteristics of older persons, which will be <strong>use</strong>d <strong>in</strong> <strong>projections</strong> of future LTC <strong>care</strong> <strong>use</strong> by older people<br />

(see Chapter 4). Us<strong>in</strong>g multivariate models, the probabilities of different categories of <strong>care</strong> <strong>use</strong> (no <strong>care</strong>,<br />

<strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mal <strong>care</strong> only, <strong>for</strong>mal <strong>care</strong> only, <strong>for</strong>mal <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mal <strong>care</strong>) are l<strong>in</strong>ked to factors such as age, gender,<br />

health problems <strong>and</strong> ho<strong>use</strong>hold composition of older persons. The analysis is based on data of the<br />

Survey of Health, Age<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> Retirement <strong>in</strong> Europe (SHARE) <strong>and</strong> builds on WP 3 analyses of factors<br />

de<strong>term</strong><strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>care</strong> <strong>use</strong> <strong>in</strong> European countries (Jiménez-Martín, Vegas Sánchez, & Vilaplana Prieto, 2011;<br />

Marc<strong>in</strong>kowska & Sowa, 2011), but adds to the previous f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> its focus on older persons (aged 65<br />

<strong>and</strong> over) <strong>and</strong> on help with personal <strong>care</strong> tasks only. Help with ho<strong>use</strong>hold tasks has not been <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong><br />

the present analysis as comparability of ho<strong>use</strong>hold help data turned out to be limited (see section 3.2.2<br />

below) <strong>and</strong> the LTC <strong>projections</strong> <strong>in</strong>clude help with personal <strong>care</strong> only.<br />

The next section briefly reviews studies of the de<strong>term</strong><strong>in</strong>ants of home <strong>care</strong> utilisation by older persons.<br />

The aim of the analysis <strong>and</strong> the data, variables <strong>and</strong> method <strong>use</strong>d, are discussed <strong>in</strong> section 3.2. Empirical<br />

results <strong>for</strong> Germany, the Netherl<strong>and</strong>s <strong>and</strong> Spa<strong>in</strong> are described <strong>in</strong> section 3.3, which discusses<br />

country-specific f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs as well as similarities <strong>and</strong> differences between the three countries. The chapter<br />

ends with a summary of the ma<strong>in</strong> f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs.<br />

3.1 De<strong>term</strong><strong>in</strong>ants of home <strong>care</strong> utilisation<br />

De<strong>term</strong><strong>in</strong>ants of <strong>for</strong>mal home <strong>care</strong> utilisation have been exam<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> numerous studies, predom<strong>in</strong>antly<br />

<strong>in</strong> the United States, but also <strong>in</strong> Europe (see Kadush<strong>in</strong>, 2004a <strong>for</strong> a review). The behavioural model of<br />

health service <strong>use</strong> proposed by Andersen <strong>and</strong> colleagues (Andersen, 1995, 2008; Andersen & Newman,<br />

7 An analysis of Pol<strong>and</strong>, the representative country <strong>for</strong> the fourth cluster, was not possible due to data limitations.<br />

| 15

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!